Project

Go-kart Design and Fabrication

TEAM ROYALZ, MADRAS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

FINAL REPORT

Abstract:

This work concentrates on explaining the design and engineering aspects of making a Go Kart as mentioned in the rulebook. This report explains objectives, assumptions and calculations made in designing a Go Kart. The team's primary objective is to design a quality kart applying our engineering skills. The design of the kart was built around the driver ensuring his comfort. To achieve this goal, the team has been divided into core groups responsible for the design and fabrication of the major sub systems which were later integrated into the final blue print.

Introduction:

The Go kart was built by TEAM ROYALZ – the students of MADRAS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. We set up some parameters of our work and the team has been divided into core groups namely Design, Engine and Transmission, Steering Brakes and wheels, Business and Management. The model was modified and retested and a final design was fixed. We approached our design by considering all the possible alternatives for the system and modeling them in CATIA and SOLIDWORKS and analysing them in ANSYS.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Dimensions:-

Length

1620mm

Height

600 mm

Wheel base

1054mm

Track width– front

945mm

Track width – rear

1054mm

Total mass

95 kg

Ground clearance

1.2”

Materials:-

Material used

Purpose

AISI 1018

Chassis

AluminiumA3105

Base plate

Aluminium sheet

Firewall of the vehicle

Fibre reinforced polyester

Side and front panels

Rear Axle Material

EN – 13 Steel

Performance:-

Maximum speed

62kmph

Maximum acceleration

3.87 m/s2

Turning radius

2.3 m

Braking distance at 45 kmph

6 m

3D Views of Kart

Fig 1. Isometric view

Fig 2. Isometric view 2

Fig 3. Front view

Fig 4. Rear View

Fig 5. Right Side View

Fig 6. Left Side View

ENGINE:

The engine used is Honda shine, 125 cc

Engine technology

Air cooled, 4 stroke,

SI engine

Length*width*Height

(approx.)

300 mm* 200mm*250 mm

Bore x stroke

52.4 x 57.838 mm

Displacement (cc)

124.7

Net power output

7.88 KW @ 7500 rpm

Net torque

10.30 Nm @ 5500 rpm

Overall Reduction Ratios

1st gear: 33.528

2nd gear: 19.624

3rd gear: 13.246

4th gear: 10.185

Fuel tank capacity

3.5 liters

Dry weight

12.2 Kg

Oil capacity

0.5 L

Design Methodology

ERGONOMICS CONSIDERATION:
The driver was made to sit in his comfortable position and the position of each component was fixed in the coordinates around him. The seat and steering design was selected to provide comfort to the driver. The pedal position and the gear shifter were positioned in the best suited points. Heat from the engine was prevented from the driver by designing a proper fire-wall. Ergonomics was also considered for safe and fast assembling and dismantling of the gokart.

FLOOR PLANNING:
The basic chassis design was done in the floor using insulation tape for an overview which was further developed as a pipe model. The drive was made to sit and the engine was placed in the respective positions. Necessary changes in the layout were made and the final design was validated.

Images of frame and prototype:

CHASSIS MATERIAL:

The material AISI1018 is used in the frame design because of its good weld ability

1. Relatively soft and, strengthens as well as good manufacturability. Analysis was conducted by use of finite element analysis on ANSYS software

Material used: AISI 1018

Ultimate strength: 440 MPa

Yield strength :370 MPa

Chemical composition:

ELEMENT

% COMPOSITION

Carbon

0.14 - 0.20%

Phosphorous and Sulphur

< 0.050%

Manganese

0.6 - 0.9%

DESIGN:
The design was done to satisfy three conditions

  • Driver comfort
  • Good performance
  • Compactness

Hence a snug driver region, greater torque multiplication and least possible wheelbase was designed.

Finite Element Analysis:

The vehicle design is tested for accuracy and stability under the situation of extreme impacts and loads acting in case of any crash during the operation or racing. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is done using ANSYS Simulation Software. FEA was done taking the impact forces in three different directions. They are

1.Frontal impact

Fig 7. Frontal Impact – Stress


Fig 8. Frontal Impact - Deformation

2. Rear impact

Fig 9. Rear Impact – Stress

Fig 10. Rear Impact - Deformation

3.Side impact

Fig 11. Side Impact – Stress

Fig 12. Side Impact - Deformation

IMPACT LOAD CALCULATIONS

FOR FRONTAL AND REAR IMPACTS:

Weight of the kart 175kg

Initial velocity= 12.5m/s

impact time= .1s

work done = change in kinetic energies

= .5*175*12.5*12.5

work done = 13671.875

s = impact time*vmax

= .1*12.5

= 1.25

force= W/s

= 10,937.5 N

Braking

Brake Type

Single disc brake

Recommended fluid

Dot 3

Brake Disc

Diameter-195mm

Brake pad thickness

4.5mm

Master cylinder diameter

19.05mm

Caliper inside cylinder

32mm

As per norms the decceleration must be twice the acceleration.

We have a maximum acceleration of 3.87m/s2

required deccleration = 7.74m/s2

Under braking dynamic condition

MT=h.m.a/(l.g)

h=.02m

l=1.04m

m=200kg

Mt= 3.1kg

Wr=1145.62

Treq=160Nm

Treq=Wr x R

Assuming that we are applying a torque of 170Nm on the rotor

Frictional force on rotor = Tdisc/ Rdisc

Rdisc=100mm F_friction_rotor=1700N

Frotor= F_friction_rotor /µ

Mu=0.5 and Frotor =3400N

Force on Calliper =fdisc/2 Fcalliper=1700N

Brakeline pressure=Fcalliper/area

C =1700/.03175

=53.543E3 N/m2

Required Fmc= P.Amc

=53.543E3*.01905

=1020N

Force applicable by driver=400N

Pedal ratio req. to obtain Fmc is

PR=Fmc/Fdriver

= 2.55

We take PR as 3

Fig 13. Disc Brake Assembly

Fig14. Master Cylinder and Brake Pedal

POWER TRAIN AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM:

Engine: Honda Shine 125 cc

Transmission:

Primary reduction = 3.35

Final reduction = 1.86

Secondary reduction:

First gear

3.587: 1

Second gear

2.100: 1

Third gear

1.417: 1

Fourth gear

1.090: 1

Chain: #40 or 08B chain (pitch, p = 12.7 mm)

CHAIN − SPROCKET SPECIFICATIONS:

Sprocket 1 :

No. of teeth (T1) = 14

Sprocket 2 :

No. of teeth (T2) = 26

Gear Ratio (r) = T2 / T1 =26/13=1.86

Centre to centre distance = 6.65 inches

Transmission system

Engine

Calculation of No. of teeth in Final Drive Sprocket

total powertrain ratio iA.

ratio iS of the moving-off element,

ratio iG ofthe transmission

final ratio iE,

iAmax = .13315*175*9.8*(.01cos10 +sin10) + 175*3.87*1.5

vehicle is designed for an acceleration of 3.87m/s^2

iAmax = 21.77

iA = iS iG iE

12.016iE= 25.596

iE= 1.8

Best near match was Sprocket with 26 teeth resulting in iE of 1.86.

CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM SPEED AND ACCELERATION :

Maximum rpm at rear axle = maximum rpm at intermediate shaft / Sprocket reduction ratio

= 8500/(3.35*1.09*1.86)

Maximum rpm at rear axle = 1251.51

Maximum speed of the kart = Maximum rpm at rear axle * rear wheel radius * (2π/60)

= 1251.51 * 0.13335 * (2π/60)

= 17.47 m/s

Maximum speed of the kart = 63 km/h

Transmission:

Engine sprocket speed (N1) =

First gear

458.47 RPM

Second gear

781.805 RPM

Third gear

1158.64 RPM

Fourth gear

1506.23 RPM

Axle sprocket speed (N2)

First gear

164.327 RPM

Second gear

280.217 RPM

Third gear

415.283 RPM

Fourth gear

539.867 RPM

Max angular speed of the rear wheel (N):

Gear

Reduction ratio

Speed of the Rear wheel (RPM)

First gear

33.528

223.693

Second gear

19.624

382.185

Third gear

13.246

566.209

Fourth gear

10.185

736.377

Performance Prediction:

Max Speed of the kart:

First gear

3.28 m/s

Second gear

7.603 m/s

Third gear

12.45 m/s

Fourth gear

17.47 m/s

Max Acceleration:

First gear

3.87 m/s2

Second gear

3.19m/s2

Third gear

2.6m/s2

Fourth gear

2.2m/s2

CHAIN SPROCKET CALCULATION :

For satisfactory performance of chain-sprocket drive, smaller pulley should be at least covered by 120 deg by the chain. So we can calculate approximate centre distance as

C = (d2-d1) / (2*cos600) = 6.238’’

Length of chain(L) = π(R+r) + {(R-r)^(2)}/C + 2*C

=3.14(4.283) +{(4.283-1.164)^(2)}/6.238 + 2*6.238

=31.14

No. of links = 31.14/0.5

= 62.28

Since we should use only even no. of links , so no. of links = 64

Final length of chain = 64*0.5

= 32”

Final center distance, C ={L - π(R+r) – (π-2φ)*(R-r)} / 2*sinφ

={ 32 – 3.14*(4.283 + 1.164 ) – (3.14 – 2.0944)*(4.283 – 1.164 ) } / (√ 3)

= 6.72

STEERING SYSTEM

NOTATIONS

VALUES

STEERING GEOMETRY

Ackermann

WHEEL BASE

1054mm

FRONT TRACK WIDTH

945

REAR TRACK WIDTH

1054mm

TURN RADIUS

2440.155mm

CASTER

3 degrees

TOE IN

2 degrees

KING PIN INCLINATION

8degrees

TIE ROD

Equal length of 340mm

STEERING RATIO

1:1

STEERING ARM LENGTH

460mm

STEERING ARM ANGLE

74.22 degree

Wheels: (in inches)

Front = 4.5 x 10 – 5

Rear = 7.1 x 11 – 5

Diameter of the rear wheel (D) = 280 mm [circumference = 398.98 mm]

Steering Model

Ackerman Percentage = 90.45%

Rear Axle Diameter Calculation:

Bending Moment Calculation:

Vertical Loading:

RA=504.32 Rb=671.68

Maximum Bending Moment=100.75Nm

Torque Calculation:

Max Torque applied= Braking Torque

Max Torque applied, T= 120Nm

Minimum Diameter for Solid Shaft:

Total Torque due to applied Torque and Vertical Loading =M2+T2

Ttotal=1202+100.752 = 156.69Nm

Shaft Material Steel:

Considering fatigue loading FOS of 3 is taken Max Allowable Shear Strength= 121 MPa

Dmin=316Tt/max

Dmax=23.6mm is enough for the purpose

Considering availability and reliability a shaft of 30mm is used

Fabricated and pre-fabricated parts

Fabricated Parts

Acquired

Frame

Engine

Tie rod

Clutch and Gear box

Brake pedal

Sprocket and chain

Disc

Master cylinder and caliper

Fire wall

Bumpers

Steering column

Tyre and wheel

Hub

Steering wheel

Disc hub

Fuel tank

Sprocket hub

Spindle

All mounts

Kill switch

Since the engine used has a four gear speed variation system, some of the calculations below are done for each gear.

Validation Plan :-

Parameter

Method Of Checking

Minimum Turning Radius

Negotiate a circle –

Distance between two diametrically opposite points.

Minimum Static Turning Effort

Weight pan to the steering wheel

Add weights till steering wheel start rotating.






Frame Loading

Slowly add weight to the assembled frame

After each addition of weight

visually inspect the frame to make sure it is holding

Once the frame has proven to support drive system with no issues

test its ability to hold the weight at different rpm

Continue to increase the weight and the rpm while inspecting the rigidity of the frame.

Travel

Vehicle on a jack

remove spring

Distance between the extreme positions of after travel.

Maximum Pulling Capacity

Attach a trailer to the vehicle

add weight subsequently

Weight previous to the one where the vehicle fails to takes off.

Stopping Distance and Time

Drive the vehicle at preset speed

Apply brakes at a marked position

Vehicle to a complete halt

Measure the stopping distance & time using stop watch.

WEIGHT OPTIMIZATION:

The components of the kart were designed and subjected to Finite Element Analysis and unwanted material were removed in order to produce a light and dynamic kart.

CONCLUSION

This project gave us the opportunity to learn a variety of core knowledge, software and machine operation. It developed several soft skills in us. Our team made the best use of it and made a well engineered race spec 125cc four stroke gokart.

REFERENCES

[1]. http://www.bmikarts.com/Brakes-Accessories_c_198.html

[2]. http://gokartsusa.com/Gokart-Mini-Bike-Minibike-Parts-Brakes.aspx

[3]. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brake

[4]. http://auto.howstuffworks.com/auto-parts/brakes/brake-types/brake.htm

[5]. http://gokartguru.com/go_kart_steering_systems.php

[6]. http://gokartguru.com/go_kart_building_bundle.php

[7]. https://www.google.co.in/search?q=steering+system+in+go+karts&hl=en&noj=1&tbm=isch&tbo=u&souce=univ&sa=X&ei=_D20U5GnBpWjugS82IHACQ&ved=0CB8QsAQ&biw=1366&bih=657

[8]. http://books.google.co.in/books?id=jK93oR47zkwC&pg=PA224&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q&f=false

Books

[9]. Don Knowels 2002 “Automobile suspension & steering system” page-224

Additional Sources

[10]. Seda Joseph B. “Drive Train Paper Report August”. Paper #1 UPRM Mini Baja 2006-2007. SAE. 2006.

[11]. Gillespie, Thomas D., Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics. Warren dale: SAE. 1992.

[12]. Lerner, Preston. “Going Nowhere Fast”. Popular Science. November 2006.

[13]. Thompson, Dale. “Ackerman? Anti-Ackerman? Or Parallel Steering?” Racing Car Technology, 2006.

[14]. Reimpell, Jornsen., et all. The Automotive Chassis: Engineering Principles. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. 2001.

[15]. Smith, Carroll. Racing Chassis and Suspension Design. Warrendale: SAE. 2004.

[16]. Smith, Carroll. Tune To Win.

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.