Challenge

Week 2 Challenge

Compare Four different tyoes of Fuel cells andstate their applications

FUEL CELL TYPE COMMON ELECTROLYTE OPERATING TEMPERATURE TYPICAL STACK SIZE ELECTRICAL EFFICIENCY (LHV) APPLICATIONS Advantages CHALLENGES
Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) Perfluorosulfonic acid <120°C <1 kW–100 kW 60% direct H2; a
40% reformed fuel b

Backup power

Portable power

Distributed generation

Transportation

Specialty vehicles

Solid electrolyte reduces corrosion and electrolyte management problems

Low temperature

Quick start-up and load following

Expensive catalysts

Sensitive to fuel impurities

Alkaline (AFC) Aqueous potassium hydroxide soaked in a porous matrix, or alkaline polymer membrane <100°C 1–100 kW
60% c

Military

Space

Backup power

Transportation

Wider range of stable materials allows lower cost components

Low temperature

Quick start-up

Sensitive to CO2 in fuel and air

Electrolyte management (aqueous)

Electrolyte conductivity (polymer)

Phosphoric acid (PAFC) Phosphoric acid soaked in a porous matrix or imbibed in a polymer membrane 150°–200°C

5–400 kW, 100 kW module (liquid PAFC)

<10 kW (polymer membrane)

40% Distributed generation

Suitable for CHP

Increased tolerance to fuel impurities

Expensive catalysts

Long start-up time

Sulfur sensitivity

Molten carbonate (MCFC) Molten lithium, sodium, and/or potassium carbonates, soaked in a porous matrix 600°–700°C 300 kW–3 MW,
300 kW module
50%

Electric utility

Distributed generation

High efficiency

Fuel flexibility

Suitable for CHP

Hybrid/gas turbine cycle

High temperature corrosion and breakdown of cell components

Long start-up time

Low power density

2.

Using a plot with energy density on the X axis and power density on the Y axis, arrange various battery types like lithium ion, lead acid, Nickel Cadmium, Ultracapacitor, fuel cell.


Figure 1 Representation of a battery (Daniell cell) showing the key features of battery operation and the requirements on electron and ion conduction.

Figure 2 Representation of (A, top) an electrochemical capacitor (supercapacitor), illustrating the energy storage in the electric double layers at the electrode−electrolyte interfaces, and (B, bottom) a fuel cell showing the continuous supply of reactants (hydrogen at the anode and oxygen at the cathode) and redox reactions in the cell.

In batteries and fuel cells, electrical energy is generated by conversion of chemical energy via redox reactions at the anode and cathode. As reactions at the anode usually take place at lower electrode potentials than at the cathode, the terms negative and positive electrode (indicated as minus and plus poles) are used. The more negative electrode is designated the anode, whereas the cathode is the more positive one. The difference between batteries and fuel cells is related to the locations of energy storage and conversion. Batteries are closed systems, with the anode and cathode being the charge-transfer medium and taking an active role in the redox reaction as “active masses”. In other words, energy storage and conversion occur in the same compartment. Fuel cells are open systems where the anode and cathode are just charge-transfer media and the active masses undergoing the redox reaction are delivered from outside the cell, either from the environment, for example, oxygen from air, or from a tank, for example, fuels such as hydrogen and hydrocarbons. Energy storage (in the tank) and energy conversion (in the fuel cell) are thus locally separated.
In electrochemical capacitors (or supercapacitors), energy may not be delivered via redox reactions and, thus the use of the terms anode and cathode may not be appropriate but are in common usage. By orientation of electrolyte ions at the electrolyte/electrolyte interface, so-called electrical double layers (EDLs) are formed and released, which results in a parallel movement of electrons in the external wire, that is, in the energy-delivering process.
In comparison to supercapacitors and fuel cells, batteries have found by far the most application markets and have an established market position. Whereas supercapacitors have found niche markets as memory protection in several electronic devices, fuel cells are basically still in the development stage and are searching to find a “killer application” that allows their penetration into the market. Fuel cells established their usefulness in space applications with the advent of the Gemini and Apollo space programs. The most promising future markets for fuel cells and supercapacitors are in the same application sector as batteries. In other words, supercapacitor and fuel cell development aim to compete with, or even to replace, batteries in several application areas. Thus, fuel cells, which originally were intended to replace combustion engines and combustion power sources due to possible higher energy conversion efficiencies and lower environmental impacts, are now under development to replace batteries to power cellular telephones and notebook computers and for stationary energy storage. The motivation for fuel cells to enter the battery market is simple. Fuel cells cannot compete today with combustion engines and gas/steam turbines because of much higher costs, inferior power and energy performance, and insufficient durability and lifetime. With operation times of typically <3000 h and, at least to an order of magnitude, similar costs, batteries are less strong competitors for fuel cells.
Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.