All Courses
All Courses
Courses by Software
Courses by Semester
Courses by Domain
Tool-focused Courses
Machine learning
POPULAR COURSES
Success Stories
MDI _ Mc Pherson Front Suspension Adams Model Wheel Rate of the baseline suspension system Wheel rate at 0 wheel travel is 32.77 N/mm The target wheel rate is 20 N/mm Baseline Motion Ratio = 0.93 Ride Rate at 0 wheel travel is 28,16 N/mm Motion Ratio = sqrt(28,16/32,77) = 0.93 (Adams found the same) …
Ozan Kocabas
updated on 19 Apr 2021
MDI _ Mc Pherson Front Suspension Adams Model
Wheel Rate of the baseline suspension system
Wheel rate at 0 wheel travel is 32.77 N/mm
The target wheel rate is 20 N/mm
Baseline Motion Ratio = 0.93
Ride Rate at 0 wheel travel is 28,16 N/mm
Motion Ratio = sqrt(28,16/32,77) = 0.93 (Adams found the same)
Required wheel rate is 20 N/mm
So ride rate should be = 20 x 0.93^2 = 17,298 N/mm
Changing the spring stiffness around the same percent from 50N/mm to 30,7 N/mm doesnt change the wheel rate at rest position but it increases in both bounce and rebound.
Wheel rate at 0 travel is still 32.77 N/mm
20 N/mm is reached with the following adjustments
New ride rate is 18,5 N/mm more than what we calculated with formulas. Because we can not predict the motion ratio shift when we change the installed length. Thats why we need softwares as ADAMS
Now we try to achieve the same wheel rate from baseline by just modifying the hardpoints not spring characteristics
Different Modifications are tested.
With mod_7 21 N/mm Wheel rate is achieved. But this installation is not plausible. Thats why we have to play both spring and hardpoints.
Changing HP and Spring characteristics
Wheel rate achieved = 20N/mm
Ride_rate = 18.16N/mm
If we arrange the motion ratio = 1 we would get the same ride rate as wheel rate in theory.
Leave a comment
Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all the comments are moderated as per our comment policy, and your email will not be published for privacy reasons. Please leave a personal & meaningful conversation.
Other comments...
Week 1 Stress Concentration on a Plate with hole
Plate 1 Von Mises Stress Von Mises Strain Plate 2: Equivalent Strain Equivalent stress a) Plate 2 has less stress and less strain. Very very small difference. b) Two small holes releases the stress concentration in the middle. Plate 2 c) Plate 1 would still be fine so less manufacturing…
26 Jan 2022 06:16 PM IST
RADIOSS Interfaces & Effect of Notches in Crashboxes
Part 1 Bumper assembly has geometric issues to be cleaned up first before meshing by surface extension midplate is extended to upper and lower plates Some other geometric issues to be fixed AFTER GEOMETRY CLEAN UP Meshing with 6mm Free Edges on the geometry: In the marked region weld connection…
12 May 2021 05:44 PM IST
Adams Assignments – Problem 4 – Steering geometry 2
Modifications: Targets: oCaster angle : ~4.00 deg Reached 4.17 oCaster moment arm : ~21.00 mm Reached 20,42 mm oKPI angle : ~13.00 deg Reached = 12.61 deg oSteer axis offset (resultant) : ~85.00 mm Reached 83 mm oSteer axis longitudinal offset : ~0.00 mm Reached 0 mm oScrub radius…
05 May 2021 08:07 AM IST
Mc Pherson Strut - Wheel and Ride Rate Modifications
MDI _ Mc Pherson Front Suspension Adams Model Wheel Rate of the baseline suspension system Wheel rate at 0 wheel travel is 32.77 N/mm The target wheel rate is 20 N/mm Baseline Motion Ratio = 0.93 Ride Rate at 0 wheel travel is 28,16 N/mm Motion Ratio = sqrt(28,16/32,77) = 0.93 (Adams found the same) …
19 Apr 2021 08:13 AM IST
Related Courses
0 Hours of Content
Skill-Lync offers industry relevant advanced engineering courses for engineering students by partnering with industry experts.
© 2025 Skill-Lync Inc. All Rights Reserved.