All Courses
All Courses
Courses by Software
Courses by Semester
Courses by Domain
Tool-focused Courses
Machine learning
POPULAR COURSES
Success Stories
Part 1 Bumper assembly has geometric issues to be cleaned up first before meshing by surface extension midplate is extended to upper and lower plates Some other geometric issues to be fixed AFTER GEOMETRY CLEAN UP Meshing with 6mm Free Edges on the geometry: In the marked region weld connection…
Ozan Kocabas
updated on 12 May 2021
Part 1
Bumper assembly has geometric issues to be cleaned up first before meshing
by surface extension midplate is extended to upper and lower plates
Some other geometric issues to be fixed
AFTER GEOMETRY CLEAN UP
Meshing with 6mm
Free Edges on the geometry:
In the marked region weld connection is needed. not necessary for this assignment.
Part 2
Case 1 :Run the crash tube model as it is.
in order to see the self contact forces we need to arrange a history output for the self contact group.
Case 2:
Changing the inacti to 6 and running the simulation again.
Case 3: Interface Type 11
Recommended Parameter for Type 7 and 11 Interfaces
Case 4 :
in this case we have to remove both notches and run the simulation again.
Notches are deleted and BC has been suppressed by givin degree of freedom in all directions
Case 5:
In the middle of the section a new notch is created.
Case 6:
New notches on both surfaces are created
Comparisons:
|
Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Case 3 |
Case 4 |
Case 5 |
Case 6 |
Definition |
Type 7 |
Type 7 |
Type 11 |
Type 11 |
Type 11 |
Type 11 |
Mass Error (%) |
0,00 % |
0,00 % |
0,00 % |
0,00 % |
0,00 % |
0,00 % |
Energy Error (%) |
-3,80 % |
-3,80 % |
-7,50 % |
-8,60 % |
-9,90 % |
-6,70 % |
Max von Mises Stress (MPa) |
695,3 |
697.4 |
622,6 |
699,6 |
623,5 |
618,4 |
Case 1 and Case 2 are identical we see that changing Inacti to 6 doesn’t have any effect on the results because there is no initial interference in the mesh.
Total energy at t0 is equal to sum of contact energy, kinetic energy, internal energy and hourglass energy at t30. Such as down below from Case 1
In all cases hourglass energy is 0 because we have appropriate property settings.
In this comparison again we see that Case 1 and Case 2 are identical.
There is no significant change in self contact forces in all cases. Type 7 and Type 11 contact definitions cause small differences.
Kinetic energy levels shows us in case 5 velocity comes to 0 quicker than other cases which means higher G Force on the occupant. These energy levels are directly relevant to resultant velocity curves below
Resultant velocity graph shows us after reaching 0 mm/ms, crash box relaxes back with around 1-2 mm/ms velocity which is also visible in the animations.
At the end of the crash we can see that all cases have similar displacement curves. The impact absorption and kinetic energy difference cause this small difference
The biggest difference in cases we see in the rigid wall forces. Case 1 and Case 2 are again identical like in other graphs above. Changing from Case 5 to Case 6 (new notches) shifts the max force around 2 ms. They both reach the same force value. When we delete all the notches we see that rigid wall forces drop drastically. Here we see the effect of the notches very clearly.
Leave a comment
Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all the comments are moderated as per our comment policy, and your email will not be published for privacy reasons. Please leave a personal & meaningful conversation.
Other comments...
Week 1 Stress Concentration on a Plate with hole
Plate 1 Von Mises Stress Von Mises Strain Plate 2: Equivalent Strain Equivalent stress a) Plate 2 has less stress and less strain. Very very small difference. b) Two small holes releases the stress concentration in the middle. Plate 2 c) Plate 1 would still be fine so less manufacturing…
26 Jan 2022 06:16 PM IST
RADIOSS Interfaces & Effect of Notches in Crashboxes
Part 1 Bumper assembly has geometric issues to be cleaned up first before meshing by surface extension midplate is extended to upper and lower plates Some other geometric issues to be fixed AFTER GEOMETRY CLEAN UP Meshing with 6mm Free Edges on the geometry: In the marked region weld connection…
12 May 2021 05:44 PM IST
Adams Assignments – Problem 4 – Steering geometry 2
Modifications: Targets: oCaster angle : ~4.00 deg Reached 4.17 oCaster moment arm : ~21.00 mm Reached 20,42 mm oKPI angle : ~13.00 deg Reached = 12.61 deg oSteer axis offset (resultant) : ~85.00 mm Reached 83 mm oSteer axis longitudinal offset : ~0.00 mm Reached 0 mm oScrub radius…
05 May 2021 08:07 AM IST
Mc Pherson Strut - Wheel and Ride Rate Modifications
MDI _ Mc Pherson Front Suspension Adams Model Wheel Rate of the baseline suspension system Wheel rate at 0 wheel travel is 32.77 N/mm The target wheel rate is 20 N/mm Baseline Motion Ratio = 0.93 Ride Rate at 0 wheel travel is 28,16 N/mm Motion Ratio = sqrt(28,16/32,77) = 0.93 (Adams found the same) …
19 Apr 2021 08:13 AM IST
Related Courses
0 Hours of Content
Skill-Lync offers industry relevant advanced engineering courses for engineering students by partnering with industry experts.
© 2025 Skill-Lync Inc. All Rights Reserved.