All Courses
All Courses
Courses by Software
Courses by Semester
Courses by Domain
Tool-focused Courses
Machine learning
POPULAR COURSES
Success Stories
Objective : To perform the head impact analysis of a head model against different scenarios and calculate the head injury criteria as well as the stress - strain plots of them. Procedure : Setting up the simulation : Simple Head v/s Rigid wall : First we will create the simulation…
Rajeev Nair
updated on 01 Nov 2020
Objective : To perform the head impact analysis of a head model against different scenarios and calculate the head injury criteria as well as the stress - strain plots of them.
Procedure :
Setting up the simulation :
Simple Head v/s Rigid wall :
First we will create the simulation of the simple head with a rigid wall to learn how to create the simulation for a head impact.
Create a new file in LS-DYNA.
Select rotate, give the axis about which it should be rotated as 1 (in this case all axes are selected), enter the co-ordinates of the simple head about which it is to be rotated (in this case, geometric centre is chosen).
Next select the transformation ID as has been created earlier in the include_transform card.
The values were taken from this study https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277331969_Investigating_the_dynamic_response_of_a_punch_to_human_head_using_finite_element_analysis
A thickness of 2mm is taken for the simple head.
Hence the rigid wall will appear like this ahead of the simple head.
Defining Contact : Next we define the contact for the crash box to collide with itself. We go to contact and choose
CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_SINGLE_SURFACE, and enter in the following values and define the slave as partid of the box. We can aslo use SINGLE_SURFACE_AUTOMATIC for this purpose. Give the name as "self_ball".
Assigning Initial Velocity :
Go to create entity-->Inital Velocity-->Select by part-->add all the nodes to which velocity is to be added of the simple head, give a velocity of 11.11 mm/ms in the negative z-direction.
Creation of central node : A node is created in the centre of the crush tube using CNRB to later on measure its acceleration in the post-processing and to obtain the hic values.
Control_termination : This option decides the termination time which is set at 7 milliseconds
In database, history node is chosen and Node ID of the cnetral node is chosen to obtain the acceleration values of the simple head during impact.
The following options are selected in Database_binary_plot. The timestep is kept at 0.2 milliseconds as shown below.
Headform v/s Rigid wall :
Next we will create the simulation of the head form with a rigid wall.
The procedure is same as above. Only the differences in procedure as compared to above are given below.
The origin about which it is rotated is changed and it is rotated 45 degrees with respect to x-axis.
The headform model is aligned like this with the rigid wall.
An additional contact of self contact is added for the skin layer of the head so that its contact with itsels is defined as it will be the one undergoing the deformation.
The slave type is chosen as part ID and part ID of skin is entered as input.
Headform v/s Car Hood :
In this simulation, we include the car hood in place of the rigid wall. As a result, 2 include keywords are used, include transform for the headform and include for the car hood.
We include the meshed hood file which is placed in the same directory as the headform and main file.
Next we assign material property to the head and section to the part
Next select the transformation ID as has been created earlier in the include_transform card.
The values were taken from a study of aluminium applications in aircraft door material.
Make sure that none of the IDs used in the two include files are similar as this can cause errors while running the simulation.
An additional contact of surface to surface is added for the contact of the head form with the hood to define the interface between the two.
The slave is taken as the skin layer of the head whereas the master is taken as the hood.
Boundary SPCs are added all around of the edge of the hood to lock all the translational motions of freedom so that the hood stays in place and does not move under impact. This is to simulate its presence when fitted to an actual car.
Run the 3 different simulations
Post processing :
Simple Head v/s Rigid wall :
This is the stress distribution of the simple head at its highest concentration. It reaches a peak value of 114 Mpa at the point of contact with the wall.
This is the deformation upon leaving the wall as shown above with slight residual stresses.
The strain plot of the simple headform is as given below.
The effective plastic strain is very less in the simple head, of the order of around 4.4% at the end of the impact.
We can see that the kinetic energy lost is equal to the internal energy gained indicating that no energy is lost in computation as energy error.
Given above we can see that looking at the acceleration plot is consists of multiple peaks and crests after collision indicating not much damping present after the collision with the rigid wall. The point acting as the sensor at the cneter of the simple head experiences a lot of shift in accleeration after collision, and this gives rise to a very high HIc 36 value as if evident in the graph.
The value of HIC is such due to the unit system being in gm, mm, ms.
In post settings we change the value of G and time to match our current units sytem.
\
Headform v/s Rigid wall :
This is the stress distribution of the simple head at its highest concentration. It reaches a peak value of 4.52 Mpa at the point of contact with the wall.
This is the deformation upon leaving the wall. As we can see the material of the skin on the simple headform exhibits plastic behaviour and retains a lot of the deformation after the impact as well.
The strain plot of the simple headform is as given below.
The effective plastic strain is much more in the heaform, this is due to the different material properties of the skin headform which retains most of the deformation.
In this we see that after the initial contact the variation in energy is more abrupt as compared to the earlier collision due to the material getting deformed to a greater extent.
Given above we can see that looking at the acceleration plot is consists of a single peak and crest indicating that the headform acts like an impact absorbing material, absorbing the impact and reducing the acceleration immediately in just one peak. The point acting as the sensor at the center of the simple head experiences lesser shift in acceleration after collision, and this gives rise to a a value lower than our intial HIC value of a simple head form and a rigid wall.
Stress v/s strain :
The stress vs strain curve is plotted for a particular element 2436 as shown below.
This particular element lies on the face that makes the collision with the rigid wall, hence it undergoes a large deformation. As we can see the strain value above 0.8 becomes unstable with respect to stress and the stress value reduces above 0.9.
Headform v/s Car Hood :
This is the stress distribution of the simple head at its highest concentration. It reaches a peak value of 0.3343 Gpa on the hood while the headform experience very little stresses and no deformation, as we can see in the simulation.
The strain plot of the simple headform is as given below.
This is the deformation upon leaving the wall. As we can see the material of the hood exhibits plastic behaviour and retains a lot of the deformation after the impact as well. This is by design so that in the case of any collision, the damage to the pedestrian's head is reduced.
In this we see that after the initial contact the variation in energy is in a very wave like manner and smooth indicating the role of the hood in cushioning the impact of the headform and deforming by itself to reduce the variation in acceleration of the headform.
Given above we can see that looking at the acceleration plot although the overall number of variations in the acceleration is more, the HIC value is much lower as compared to the previous 2 simulations. Moreover we see the difference in HIC when the headform collides with an automotive hood as compared to a rigid wall. This is because the headform experiences very less changes in acceleration due to the yielding nature of the hood. Hence the injury is reduced to the pedestrian and all vehicles are mandated by law to have such a design for the hood. Also the material chosen for the hood is aluminium which exhibits plastic behaviour.
Stress v/s strain :
The stress vs strain curve is plotted for a particular element 3038 as shown below.
Strain plot
As we can see above the strain value of an element on the headform is very less as compared to the earlier collsiion with a rigid wall. The strain is of the order of 0.1% which is negligeble.
Stress/Strain plot :
This particular element lies on the face that makes the collision with the hood. Uptil the point of nonlinearity the stress-strain curve is quite linear unitl it tapers off.
Conclusion : The hoods of automotive vehicles are made to be yielding and undergo deformation so that in the case of a collision with pedestrian, it will absorb the impact and deform upon contact thereby reducing the rate of change of acceleration and reducing the risk of injury to the pedestrian.
Result :
Leave a comment
Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all the comments are moderated as per our comment policy, and your email will not be published for privacy reasons. Please leave a personal & meaningful conversation.
Other comments...
Week 11 Car Crash simulation
Objective : To setup the simulation of the given Bucket and bullet penetration test setup to obtain the desired results. Setting up the simulation Importing geometry :Next we import the geometry and rename them as Wall and Carbody.Then we will open Ansys explicit dynamics to set up the rest of the simulation.…
16 Oct 2021 06:46 PM IST
Week 10 Bullet penetrating a Bucket Challenge
Objective : To setup the simulation of the given Bucket and bullet penetration test setup to obtain the desired results. Setting up the simulation To set up the simulation, first we need to import all the required material cards such as AL 1100-O, Al6061 and Gold for the bucketFor the bullet Tantalum has…
16 Oct 2021 05:53 PM IST
Week 9 Machining with Planer Challenge
Objective : To setup the simulation of the given machining with planer model setup to obtain the desired results. Setting up the simulation To set up the simulation, first we need to import all the required material cards such as Structural Steel and AL 1100-O for the workpieceThe below materials can be…
03 Oct 2021 08:48 PM IST
Week 9 Tension and Torsion test challenge
Objective : To setup the simulation of the given tensile and torsion test to obtain the desired results. Setting up the simulation To set up the simulation, first we need to import all the required material cards such as Structural Steel and STEEL 1006 for the workpieceThe below materials can be found…
03 Oct 2021 06:50 PM IST
Related Courses
0 Hours of Content
Skill-Lync offers industry relevant advanced engineering courses for engineering students by partnering with industry experts.
© 2025 Skill-Lync Inc. All Rights Reserved.