All Courses
All Courses
Courses by Software
Courses by Semester
Courses by Domain
Tool-focused Courses
Machine learning
POPULAR COURSES
Success Stories
AIM To simulate a steady state flow of hot air and cold air through a short and long mixing tees and compare the mixing effectiveness. The simulation is carried over different mesh sizes and models such as k-epsilon and k-omega and the results to get a conclusion. OBJECTIVE The main objective of this…
Manu Mathai
updated on 10 Nov 2022
AIM
To simulate a steady state flow of hot air and cold air through a short and long mixing tees and compare the mixing effectiveness. The simulation is carried over different mesh sizes and models such as k-epsilon and k-omega and the results to get a conclusion.
OBJECTIVE
Case – 1 :
Case – 2 :
INTRODUCTION
In this project simulation of a steady state flow of hot and cold air through a short and long mixing Tee will be carried out. The inlet hot and cold temperature are 360C and 190C. Realizable k-ε and k–ω SST model will be used for all the cases and a comparative study is done. Mesh independence study is obtained for various element mesh length from 5,4,3,2,1mm respectively. The outlet velocity and temperature of each cases is compared with the analytical values. Velocity and temperature at outlet are studied model wise as well as mesh length wise.
THEORY
Mixing Tee
Mixing of fluids at different temperatures and velocity is quite common in Industry. Fluids are transported through flow sections. Flow sections of circular cross sections are known as pipes. Most fluid especially liquids are transported in circular pipes. This is because, pipes with a circular cross section can withstand large pressure differences between the inside and outside without significant distortion. A typical piping system involves pipes of different diameters connected to each other by various fittings (T-Junction, Y-Junction) or elbow to ensure continuous transport of the fluid. Mixing Tee is also called T-Junction.
The desired temperature at the outlet is obtained in the mixing tee is by regulating the temperature and velocities of the hot inlet and outlet temperature.
Analytically the outlet temperature can be calculated using this mixing formula
K-Epsilon (k−ϵ) Model
The k-epsilon (k−ϵ) model for turbulence is the most common to simulate the mean flow characteristics for turbulent flow conditions. It belongs to the Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) family of turbulence models where all the effects of turbulence are modeled.
It is a two-equation model. That means that in addition to the conservation equations, it solves two transport equations (PDEs), which account for the history effects like convection and diffusion of turbulent energy. The two transported variables are turbulent kinetic energy (k), which determines the energy in turbulence, and turbulent dissipation rate (ϵ), which determines the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy.
The k−ϵ model is shown to be reliable for free-shear flows, such as the ones with relatively small pressure gradients, but might not be the best model for problems involving adverse pressure gradients, large separations, and complex flows with strong curvatures.
There exist different variations of the k-epsilon model such as Standard, Realizable, RNG, etc. each with certain modifications to perform better under certain conditions of the fluid flow.
K-Omega (k−ω)
The k-omega (k−ω) turbulence model is one of the most commonly used models to capture the effect of turbulent flow conditions. It belongs to the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) family of turbulence models where all the effects of turbulence are modeled.
It is a two-equation model. That means in addition to the conservation equations, it solves two transport equations (PDEs), which account for the history effects like convection and diffusion of turbulent energy. The two transported variables are turbulent kinetic energy (k), which determines the energy in turbulence, and specific turbulent dissipation rate (ω), which determines the rate of dissipation per unit turbulent kinetic energy. ω is also referred to as the scale of turbulence.
The standard k−ω model is a low Re model, i.e., it can be used for flows with low Reynolds number where the boundary layer is relatively thick and the viscous sublayer can be resolved.
Thus, the standard k−ω model is best used for near-wall treatment. Other advantages include a superior performance for complex boundary layer flows under adverse pressure gradients and separations (e.g., external aerodynamics and turbomachinery). On the contrary, this model has also shown to predict excessive and early separations.
There exist different variations of the k-omega model such as standard k-omega (discussed above), baseline k-omega, k-omega SST, etc., each with certain modifications to perform better under certain conditions of the fluid flow.
SST stands for shear stress transport. The SST formulation switches to a k−ϵ behavior in the free-stream, which avoids the k−ω problem of being sensitive to the inlet free-stream turbulence properties.
The k−ω SST model provides a better prediction of flow separation than most RANS models and also accounts for its good behavior in adverse pressure gradients. It has the ability to account for the transport of the principal shear stress in adverse pressure gradient boundary layers. It is the most commonly used model in the industry given its high accuracy to expense ratio.
On the negative side, the SST model produces some large turbulence levels in regions with large normal strain, like stagnation regions and regions with strong acceleration. This effect is much less pronounced than with a normal k-epsilon model though.
SOLVING & MODELLING APPROACH
We have two mixing tees one is shorter than the other given in the challenge
Short Tee Long Tee
So the above challenge can be grouped based on the following conditions
Momentum ratio = velocity at cold inlet / velocity at hot inlet
Hot Inlet Velocity = 3m/s
Hot inlet temperature is 360C & the Cold inlet is at 190C.
Based on the above condition we categorise the total number of cases as show in the table below.
Total Cases
Analytical results to be obtained and compared with the obtained result. We are considering our working fluid as air, whose density (ρ) is 1.225 kg/m. We have the formula,
Thot=36oC
Thot=36oC
Vhot=3 m/s
Tcold=19oC
Vcold=6m/s
Ahot=891.86mm2
Acold=221.42mm2
ρair=1.225 kg/m
Mass Flow Rates,
mhot=ρ⋅A⋅Vhot
=1.225×887.9154×3
mhot=3263.0891 kg/s
mcold=ρ⋅A⋅Vcold
=1.225×222.2797×3
mcold=1633.7557 kg/s
Analytical Average Outlet Temperature,
Tmixture=
Tmixture=30.3282oC
Likewise for all the cases Tmixture values are calculated and computed as given in the table below.
Analytical Outlet Temperature
Since there are many cases as shown above we will go for a tree approach in the workbench. Start with a geometry.
We can load the given model in the geometry. Since there are two mixing tees two separate geometry is used. In the geometry volume of the Mixing Tee that is to be analysed is extracted.
Then after the geometry we will go for meshing. Since we have 5 different mesh sizes, create 5 different mesh modules and connect with parent geometry as in the figure.
After the meshing fluent module are created to solve and simulate the mixing Tees. Since we have two turbulence model and two momentum ratios, total of 4 modules to be created under each meshing and to be connected accordingly as shown in the figure. All the parameters and boundary conditions are given inside the solution.
Once the solution are generated results module are added and connected to each model. Result module is used to get various results of the problem statement. Such as Contour plots, vector plot Graphical chart plots, Animations etc.,
These graphs, plots and section plane views are used in the better understanding of the results obtained for the given problem statement and are used for comparing the values to get the conclusions and findings.
PRE PROCESSING AND SOLVER SETTING
In our challenge we will create a flow simulation of cold and hot air through two mixing Tees for the previously mentioned cases in the table. In general I will be explaining only one case and posting the screenshots of the other cases.
Case 1
Short Tee – Mesh 5mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Step 1 : Load the short tee in the geometry Space Claim. Since we are analysing the inside volume mixing, we extract the volume using extract function in the Space Claim. Only the volume is required for analysis and so the solid part is suppressed.
Once this process is done. We will close the space claim and open the mesh module.
Step 2 : Open the mesh module and under the mesh details give CFD Fluent as preference and Element size of 5mm. We can refine the mesh by giving sizing and other options. But since we are going to go for mesh independence study uniform meshing size is maintained through out the volume. Note the number of nodes and elements for the study.
After the meshing is done check for the quality criterion.Check whether the mesh quality is above 5%. Once this is done name the faces of the volume as Inlet Cold, Inlet Hot, Outlet & Wall.
Step 3 : After the meshing and face naming are done move on to Fluent Solver. In the fluent launcher select double precision, display mesh after reading and give the appropriate solver processors and GPUs.
In the ANSYS CFD we need to give all the conditions, parameters and models. To start with go to physics menu and click general settings. In that select Pressure based type solver, Absolute velocity formulation and steady state flow. Since we are handling with temperature check the energy box under Physics menu. Next we need to give the model. For this case K Epsilon realizable model is selected.
Next is the flow material selection. By default air is selected. Hence no need to change any values or selection. After that boundary conditions are to be assigned. For that click on zones- boundaries.
Give all the boundary conditions such as pressure, velocity, temperature etc., to all the boundaries of the volume as required. Care should be taken while assigning the boundary type. In our case Inlet cold and hot initials values are to be assigned.
After the physics part is done move to the solution part. To generate any particular report such as area weighted average or standard deviation for temperature and velocity, click definitions-new and select the required one. In the popup window select the appropriate field variable, surfaces and other options.
Once the report definition part is completed click Initialize to initialize the boundary conditions. Hybrid method is selected before initialization. Click on Autosave to obtain a animation of the flow in the post results.
Then run the calculation for a given number of iterations till the convergence is obtained. Depending upon the number of elements and model selected the time required for convergence varies. In the CFD module itself we can compute, measure, plot, animate, etc., if needed.
Step 4 : After the solutions and calculations move to the result module to get different graphs, plots, contours, animations etc.,. Sectional views can be created if required.
RESULTS
SHORT TEE
Case 1
Short Tee – Mesh 5mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 5mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 2
Short Tee – Mesh 5mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 5mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 3
Short Tee – Mesh 5mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 5mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 4
Short Tee – Mesh 5mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 5mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 5
Short Tee – Mesh 4mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 4mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 6
Short Tee – Mesh 4mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 4mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 7
Short Tee – Mesh 4mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 4mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 8
Short Tee – Mesh 4mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 4mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 9
Short Tee – Mesh 3mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 3mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 10
Short Tee – Mesh 3mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 3mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 11
Short Tee – Mesh 3mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 3mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 12
Short Tee – Mesh 3mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 3mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 13
Short Tee – Mesh 2mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 2mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 14
Short Tee – Mesh 2mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 2mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 15
Short Tee – Mesh 2mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 2mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 16
Short Tee – Mesh 2mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 2mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 17
Short Tee – Mesh 1mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 1mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 18
Short Tee – Mesh 1mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 1mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 19
Short Tee – Mesh 1mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 2
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 1mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
Case 20
Short Tee – Mesh 1mm – K Omega – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 1mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature Fig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
The entire result of the short Tee mixing simulation can be summarized as given in the table above. There are a total of 20 cases in short Tee. For each cases we have noted the nodes count, elements count, Analytical outlet temperature, average outlet temperature, average outlet velocity and Standard deviation of outlet temperature. We will discuss the result under two momentum ratio categories.
Momentum Ratio – 2
In momentum ratio 2 there are total of 10 cases. 5 each for the K epsilon and K omega models. Here we can calculate the analytical value of the outlet temperature which is equal to 30.3282oC. We got a maximum average outlet temperature of 30.5507 oC for the K omega model with a mesh size of 1mm and a minimum average outlet temperature of 30.2393 oC for the K epsilon model with a mesh size of 4mm. The minimum and maximum average outlet velocity was obtained as 4.4945m/s and 4.5244 m/s for the K epsilon model with mesh size of 3mm and for the K omega model with mesh size of 1mm respectively. The standard deviation of outlet temperature was observed to be minimum 1.2438 for K-epsilon model with 5mm mesh size and maximum 2.4345 for K-omega model with 2mm mesh size. It was observed that there is no much difference between the analytical and simulation results.
Momentum Ratio – 4
In momentum ratio 4 there are total of 10 cases. 5 each for the K epsilon and K omega models. Here we can calculate the analytical value of the outlet temperature which is equal to 27.4942oC. We got a maximum average outlet temperature of 27.6646 oC for the K omega model with a mesh size of 3mm and a minimum average outlet temperature of 27.5456 oC for the K epsilon model with a mesh size of 4mm. The minimum and maximum average outlet velocity was obtained as 6.0151m/s and 6.1175 m/s for the K epsilon model with mesh size of 3mm and for the K omega model with mesh size of 2mm respectively. The standard deviation of outlet temperature was observed to be minimum 1.0276 for K-epsilon model with 3mm mesh size and maximum 2.2012 for K-omega model with 1mm mesh size. It was observed that there is no much difference between the analytical and simulation results.
Effectiveness of Short Tee
Comparing the results of all the cases we can conclude that the minimum standard deviation gives the better mixing. Here Standard deviation of 1.0276 is the lowest of all. Hence K Epsilon model with momentum ratio of 4 and mesh size of 3 has better efficiency than the others. While comparing the temperature and velocity contour graphs, it was observed that long tee mixing is more efficient compared to the short tee.
Temperature Vs Length Comparison
These are the comparison graphs of temperature. Each graph represent the change in temperature of outlet along the length of the model for different mesh sizes. For each mesh sizes we have plotted a graph with the comparison of 4 cases.
We can observe that the there is a sudden drop in the temperature in all the cases at a particular area. This region is the area where cold and hot air enters. At this point mixing has just began. After that the mixing progresses along the model giving a required temperature at output. It can be noticed that momentum ration 4 cases reaches the steady state at a length of 0.05m. From there is not much comparable change in the temperature implying that the mixing has been occurred effectively. But for momentum ratio 2 cases the mixing is occurring to the very outlet giving an undesired temperature. From the graph it can be noted that K Epsilon with momentum ration of 4 and mesh size of 3mm has the highest mixing effectiveness. Also plotted temperature Vs length for all the models which gives the same inference as above.
Velocity Vs Length Comparison
These are the comparison graphs of velocity. Each graph represent the change in velocity of outlet along the length of the model for different mesh sizes. For each mesh sizes we have plotted a graph with the comparison of 4 cases.
We can observe that the there is a sudden rise in the velocity in all the cases at a particular area. This region is the area where cold and hot air enters. At this point mixing has just began. After that the mixing progresses along the model giving a required velocity at output. It can be noticed that momentum ration 4 cases reache the steady state at a length of 0.05m. From there is not much comparable change in the velocity implying that the mixing has been occurred effectively. But for momentum ratio 2 cases the mixing is occurring to the very outlet giving an undesired velocity. From the graph it can be noted that K Epsilon with momentum ration of 4 and mesh size of 3mm has the highest mixing effectiveness. Also plotted temperature Vs length for all the models which gives the same inference as above.
By comparing all the results it is evident that the K-Epsilon model with momentum ratio of 4 and mesh size of 3mm gives as the better mixing. Hence I will chose this as my main model for the long tee. All the cases for long tee has been computed as short tee. But the optimum results are explained in the report.
LONG TEE
Short Tee – Mesh 2mm – K Epsilon – Momentum ratio 4
Inlet Hot Temperature – 36oC
Inlet Cold Temperature – 19oC
Inlet Hot Velocity – 3m/s
Fig 1 : 2mm Mesh
Fig 2 : Residual Plot
Fig 3 : Standard deviation of temperature F ig 4: Average Temperature
Fig 5 : XY plane temperature contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity contour
Fig 6 : XY plane velocity Vector
Fig 7 : Wall Temperature contour Fig 8: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 9 : Wall Velocity contour Fig 10: YZ plane velocity contour
Fig 11 : Temperature Vs Length
Fig 12 : Velocity Vs Length
The entire result of the long Tee mixing simulation can be summarized as given in the table above. In the previous case we came to know that K epsilon model with momentum ration 4 has the highest effectiveness. In this long tee model case also minimum standard deviation is obtained K epsilon model with momentum ratio 4 and a mesh size of 2mm. But in short tee model optimum mesh size was 3mm.There are a total of 20 cases in short Tee. For each cases we have noted the nodes count, elements count, Analytical outlet temperature, average outlet temperature, average outlet velocity and Standard deviation of outlet temperature. We will discuss the result under two momentum ratio categories.
Momentum Ratio – 2
In momentum ratio 2 there are total of 10 cases. 5 each for the K epsilon and K omega models. Here we can calculate the analytical value of the outlet temperature which is equal to 30.3281oC. We got a maximum average outlet temperature of 30.5816 oC for the K omega model with a mesh size of 1mm and a minimum average outlet temperature of 30.3047 oC for the K epsilon model with a mesh size of 5mm. The minimum and maximum average outlet velocity was obtained as 4.4901m/s and 4.5152 m/s for the K epsilon model with mesh size of 3mm and for the K omega model with mesh size of 1mm respectively. The standard deviation of outlet temperature was observed to be minimum 0.9530 for K-epsilon model with 5mm mesh size and maximum 2.0655 for K-omega model with 2mm mesh size. It was observed that there is no much difference between the analytical and simulation results.
Momentum Ratio – 4
In momentum ratio 4 there are total of 10 cases. 5 each for the K epsilon and K omega models. Here we can calculate the analytical value of the outlet temperature which is equal to 27.4942oC. We got a maximum average outlet temperature of 27.6098 oC for the K omega model with a mesh size of 1mm and a minimum average outlet temperature of 27.4846 oC for the K epsilon model with a mesh size of 1mm. The minimum and maximum average outlet velocity was obtained as 5.9950m/s and 6.0647 m/s for the K epsilon model with mesh size of 3mm and for the K omega model with mesh size of 1mm respectively. The standard deviation of outlet temperature was observed to be minimum 0.5483 for K-epsilon model with 2mm mesh size and maximum 1.0826 for K-omega model with 1mm mesh size. It was observed that there is no much difference between the analytical and simulation results.
Effectiveness of Short Tee
Comparing the results of all the cases we can conclude that the minimum standard deviation gives the better mixing. Here Standard deviation of 0.5483 is the lowest of all. Hence K Epsilon model with momentum ratio of 4 and mesh size of 2 has better efficiency than the others. While comparing the temperature and velocity contour graphs, it was observed that long tee mixing is more efficient compared to the short tee.
Temperature Vs Length Comparison
These are the comparison graphs of temperature. Each graph represent the change in temperature of outlet along the length of the model for different mesh sizes. For each mesh sizes we have plotted a graph with the comparison of 4 cases.
We can observe that the there is a sudden drop in the temperature in all the cases at a particular area. This region is the area where cold and hot air enters. At this point mixing has just began. After that the mixing progresses along the model giving a required temperature at output. It can be noticed that momentum ration 4 cases reaches the steady state at a length of 0.05m. From there is not much comparable change in the temperature implying that the mixing has been occurred effectively. But for momentum ratio 2 cases the mixing is occurring to the very outlet giving an undesired temperature. From the graph it can be noted that K Epsilon with momentum ration of 4 and mesh size of 2mm has the highest mixing effectiveness. Also plotted temperature Vs length for all the models which gives the same inference as above.
Velocity Vs Length Comparison
These are the comparison graphs of velocity. Each graph represent the change in velocity of outlet along the length of the model for different mesh sizes. For each mesh sizes we have plotted a graph with the comparison of 4 cases.
We can observe that the there is a sudden rise in the velocity in all the cases at a particular area. This region is the area where cold and hot air enters. At this point mixing has just began. After that the mixing progresses along the model giving a required velocity at output. It can be noticed that momentum ration 4 cases reach the steady state at a length of 0.05m. From there is not much comparable change in the velocity implying that the mixing has been occurred effectively. But for momentum ratio 2 cases the mixing is occurring to the very outlet giving an undesired velocity. From the graph it can be noted that K Epsilon with momentum ration of 4 and mesh size of 2mm has the highest mixing effectiveness. Also plotted temperature Vs length for all the models which gives the same inference as above.
Mesh Independence Study
Mesh independence study is the study of the effect of the mesh element size in the final result. Here our desired result is average outlet temperature. So temperature is plotted against number of mesh elements. Elements for the below given table values.
The above table shows the different cases of short and long mixing tees. Number of nodes and elements was noted while meshing .Analytical temperature and average output temperature were also tabulated for each cases. From the table we can say that as the mesh element size is decreased the more accurate the simulated value towards the analytical value.
For example I have plotted two cases as shown in the above figure. When element size is decreased, accurate results are obtained. For the above flow conditions, calculated value for the outlet temperature is 30.3282°C. But for our mesh size = 5mm, the outlet temperature is 30.2798°C. So when the mesh size is decreased, obviously the better results are obtained. But computational time is higher. So one must be careful in choosing the type of element, mesh size for a particular problem to obtain better results.
CONCLUSION
Leave a comment
Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all the comments are moderated as per our comment policy, and your email will not be published for privacy reasons. Please leave a personal & meaningful conversation.
Other comments...
Week 3: Flow over a backward facing step
AIM: To run the simulation of Flow over a Backward facing step with three different base mesh sizes with help of using Converge Studio, Cygwin and Paraview and camparing the parameters. OBJECTIVE:- . Run 3 simulation . with 3 different base mesh sizes are 1. dx = 2e-3m dy = 2e-3m dz = 2e-3m …
11 Sep 2023 08:35 AM IST
Project 2 - 3D CFD modelling of Air cooling system and liquid cooling system for battery thermal management
1. Comparative study of thermal performance of air-cooled and liquid-cooled battery modules:- Air-cooled module:- The temperature distribution over the module surface with the air-cooling system at the end of the discharge process. The flow rate and temperature of the air at the inlet of the cooling system are 3 L/s and…
11 Sep 2023 08:25 AM IST
Week 1: Channel flow simulation using CONVERGE CFD
Introduction: Channel flow is an internal flow in which the confining walls change the hydrodynamic structure of the flow from an arbitrary state at the channel inlet to a certain state at the outlet. The simplest illustration of internal flow is a laminar flow in a circular tube, while a turbulent flow in the rotor of…
01 Sep 2023 10:15 AM IST
Project 1 - 1d modelling of liquid cooling system
Problem Description: we have a cooling plate mounted with 2 modules, each containing multiple cells. The flow pattern indicates that water is used as the coolant, flowing from a tank of limited capacity. The goal is to analyze the thermal behavior of the system, including plotting the top and bottom module temperatures,…
01 Sep 2023 10:03 AM IST
Related Courses
Skill-Lync offers industry relevant advanced engineering courses for engineering students by partnering with industry experts.
© 2025 Skill-Lync Inc. All Rights Reserved.