All Courses
All Courses
Courses by Software
Courses by Semester
Courses by Domain
Tool-focused Courses
Machine learning
POPULAR COURSES
Success Stories
OBJECTIVE: For this challenge, we have created two versions of the mixing tee. One of them is longer than the other. Our job is to set up steady-state simulations to compare the mixing effectiveness when hot inlet temperature is 360C & the Cold inlet is at 190C. Use the k-epsilon and k-omega SST model for the…
Sachin Barse
updated on 07 Nov 2022
OBJECTIVE:
For this challenge, we have created two versions of the mixing tee. One of them is longer than the other.
Our job is to set up steady-state simulations to compare the mixing effectiveness when hot inlet temperature is 360C & the Cold inlet is at 190C.
Use the k-epsilon and k-omega SST model for the first case and based on your judgment use the more suitable model for further cases. Giving the reason for choosing a suitable model is compulsory.
INTRODUCTION:
The function of mixing Tee is to provide proper mixing of quantities to get the desired result at the outlet.
By controlling the velocity of chilled air we can get the desired temperature in the room.
ANSYS WORKFLOW:
GEOMETRY: Construct a two or three dimensional representation of the object to be modelled and tested using the work plane coordinate system within ANSYS.
MESH: At this point ANSYS understands the makeup of the part. Now define how the modelled system should be broken down into finite pieces.
SETUP: The case setup will be done using ansys fluent
SOLUTION: Ansys fluent where run time result visualization is done
RESULTS: Post processing of results will be done here using CFD-post
SHORT TEE:
GEOMETRY SETUP:
The computational models are uploaded to the Ansys Space Claim as a step file.
In this project, we are interested in performing fluid flow analysis through the geometry, hence we used the volume extraction option to extract the fluid volume from the geometry. Then the solid model is suppressed for physics from the fluid model to create mesh at the interested region.
MESH GENERATION:
The boundary names inlet_x, inlet_y, outlet and wall are defined using the named selection option.
After generating the mesh, the number of nodes and elements are investigated using the statistics option. Then the mesh quality is checked by choosing the mesh metrices option in quality section.
The element quality should not be less than 5%. In our case minimum mesh quality is 30%, so we can move ahead.
SETUP AND SOLUTION:
CASE 1:
CASE 1.1:
SETUPS |
SHORT TEE (MR=2 AND HOT INLET VELOCITY = 3m/s)
|
|
K-EPSILON |
K-OMEGA |
|
SOLVER TYPE |
Pressure based |
Pressure based |
VELOCITY FORMULATION |
Absolute |
Absolute |
TIME |
Steady |
Steady |
VISCOUS MODEL |
Realizable K-epsilon with standard wall function |
K-omega SST model |
MATERIAL |
Air |
Air |
CELL ZONES |
Fluid type : air |
Fluid type : air |
BOUNDARIES |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 6m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 6m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
The hybrid scheme is used for initialization and the no. of iterations are setup and then click on calculate option.
RESULTS:
K-EPSILON MODEL:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
K-OMEGA MODEL:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
SUMMARY:
|
SHORT TEE (MR = 2) |
|
K-EPSILON |
K-OMEGA |
|
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE [K] |
303.413 |
303.458 |
STANDARD DEVIATION |
1.5 |
1.6 |
NO OF ITERATIONS |
150 |
170 |
CASE 1.2:
SETUPS |
SHORT TEE (MR=2 AND HOT INLET VELOCITY = 3m/s)
|
|
K-EPSILON |
K-OMEGA |
|
SOLVER TYPE |
Pressure based |
Pressure based |
VELOCITY FORMULATION |
Absolute |
Absolute |
TIME |
Steady |
Steady |
VISCOUS MODEL |
Realizable K-epsilon with standard wall function |
K-omega SST model |
MATERIAL |
Air |
Air |
CELL ZONES |
Fluid type : air |
Fluid type : air |
BOUNDARIES |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 12m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 12m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
The hybrid scheme is used for initialization and the no. of iterations are setup and then click on calculate option.
RESULTS:
K-EPSILON MODEL:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
K-OMEGA MODEL:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
SUMMARY:
|
SHORT TEE (MR = 4) |
|
K-EPSILON |
K-OMEGA |
|
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE [K] |
300.396 |
300.38 |
STANDARD DEVIATION |
1.1 |
1.2 |
NO OF ITERATIONS |
130 |
160 |
ANALYTICAL SOLUTION:
MOMENTUM RATIO 2:
MOMENTUM RATIO 4:
CONCLUSION:
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE:
On comparing the both models with analytical solution we got nearly the same results.
ITERATIONS TO CONVERGE:
No. of iterations taken to converge is less for Realisable K-epsilon model than K-omega SST model.
STANDARD DEVIATION:
The standard deviation of k-epsilon model is less than k-omega model which shows the better mixing efficiency in k-epsilon model.
So based on the above observations the K-epsilon turbulence model is predicting the results accurately in less no. of iterations. So we can use realisable k-epsilon model for case 2
LONG TEE:
GEOMETRY SETUP:
The computational models are uploaded to the Ansys Space Claim as a step file.
In this project, we are interested in performing fluid flow analysis through the geometry, hence we used the volume extraction option to extract the fluid volume from the geometry. Then the solid model is suppressed for physics from the fluid model to create mesh at the interested region.
MESH GENERATION:
The boundary names inlet_x, inlet_y, outlet and wall are defined using the named selection option.
After generating the mesh, the number of nodes and elements are investigated using the statistics option. Then the mesh quality is checked by choosing the mesh metrices option in quality section.
The element quality should not be less than 5%. In our case minimum mesh quality is 30%, so we can move ahead.
SETUP AND SOLUTION:
CASE 2:
CASE 2.1:
SETUPS |
LONG TEE (MR=2 AND HOT INLET VELOCITY 3m/s) |
K-EPSILON |
|
SOLVER TYPE |
Pressure based |
VELOCITY FORMULATION |
Absolute |
TIME |
Steady |
VISCOUS MODEL |
Realizable K-epsilon with standard wall function |
MATERIAL |
Air |
CELL ZONES |
Fluid type : air |
BOUNDARIES |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 6m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
The hybrid scheme is used for initialization and the no. of iterations are setup and then click on calculate option.
RESULTS:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
CASE 2.2:
SETUPS |
LONG TEE (MR=2 AND HOT INLET VELOCITY 3m/s) |
K-EPSILON |
|
SOLVER TYPE |
Pressure based |
VELOCITY FORMULATION |
Absolute |
TIME |
Steady |
VISCOUS MODEL |
Realizable K-epsilon with standard wall function |
MATERIAL |
Air |
CELL ZONES |
Fluid type : air |
BOUNDARIES |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 12m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
The hybrid scheme is used for initialization and the no. of iterations are setup and then click on calculate option.
RESULTS:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
SUMMARY:
|
LONG TEE (MR = 2) |
LONG TEE (MR = 4) |
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE [K] |
303.367 |
300.449 |
STANDARD DEVIATION |
1.2 |
0.8 |
NO OF ITERATIONS |
180 |
130 |
COMPARISON OF BOTH LONG AND SHORT TEE:
K-EPSILON REALIZABLE MODEL |
|||||
GEOMETRY |
MOMENTUM RATIO |
CELL COUNT |
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE [K] |
NO. OF ITERATIONS |
STANDARD DEVIATION |
SHORT TEE |
2 |
12583 |
303.413 |
150 |
1.5 |
SHORT TEE |
4 |
12583 |
300.396 |
130 |
1.1 |
LONG TEE |
2 |
15368 |
303.367 |
180 |
1.2 |
LONG TEE |
4 |
15368 |
300.449 |
130 |
0.8 |
OVERALL DISCUSSION:
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE:
Irrespective of length of the mixing Tee, the average outlet temperature on both cases are quite same.
MOMENTUM RATIO:
NO. OF ITERATIONS:
The longer Tee takes more time to converge than short Tee.
CONCLUSION:
GRID INDEPENDENCY TEST:
Short Tee model is selected for grid dependence test.
MESH GENERATION:
5mm:
4mm:
3mm:
RESULTS:
5mm:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF TEMPERATURE:
STANDARD DEVIATION OF TEMPERATURE:
4mm:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF TEMPERATURE:
STANDARD DEVIATION OF TEMPERATURE:
3mm:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF TEMPERATURE:
STANDARD DEVIATION OF TEMPERATURE:
SUMMARY:
MESH SIZE |
NO. OF ELEMENTS |
NO. OF NODES |
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE |
NO. OF ITERATIONS |
5mm |
16143 |
3460 |
303.251 |
250 |
4mm |
23007 |
4925 |
303.246 |
175 |
3mm |
39921 |
8369 |
303.292 |
210 |
CONCLUSION:
Leave a comment
Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all the comments are moderated as per our comment policy, and your email will not be published for privacy reasons. Please leave a personal & meaningful conversation.
Other comments...
FINAL INDEPENDENT PROJECT
Project : Design & Animate the drone camera for project model. Attached Link For Model Review : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1f6sjaJc6Od2AEnmh-JYFFoLMmUveWk61/view?usp=drive_link
15 May 2024 05:42 PM IST
Week - 4
AIM: Implement control logic of a “washing machine” using Stateflow as per given sequence: If the power supply is available, the system gets activated. If the Water supply is not available, stop the process & indicate through LED Soaking time should be 200s followed by Washing…
13 Mar 2024 10:27 AM IST
Week -2
1.Door Bell Simulink Model: Simulink Model Explanation: The pulse generator is used to create square wave pulses at regular intervals.The block waveform parameters Amplitude,pulse width,period and phase delay,determine the shape of the output waveform. …
12 Mar 2024 12:23 PM IST
Project 1
Attached Model for Project :- Attached link for grading :- https://drive.google.com/file/d/13bjiEKi2h1sYtm9LzZMouMksFAZYnVIQ/view?usp=drive_link
29 Oct 2023 11:00 AM IST
Related Courses
Skill-Lync offers industry relevant advanced engineering courses for engineering students by partnering with industry experts.
© 2025 Skill-Lync Inc. All Rights Reserved.