All Courses
All Courses
Courses by Software
Courses by Semester
Courses by Domain
Tool-focused Courses
Machine learning
POPULAR COURSES
Success Stories
CHT ANALYSIS ON A GRAPHICS CARD l. OBJECTIVE To perform steady-state conjugate heat transfer analysis on Graphics Card To find the effect of different velocities…
Himanshu Chavan
updated on 16 Jul 2021
CHT ANALYSIS ON A GRAPHICS CARD
l. OBJECTIVE
ll. INTRODUCTION
1. Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT)
Conjugate heat transfer is defined as the heat transfer between two domains by exchange of thermal energy. For a system the thermal energy available is defined by its temperature and the movement of thermal energy is defined by its heat flux through the outer walls. Heat transfer in solid happens through conduction and walls by convection and in liquid phase through convection.
CHT provides the temperature prediction and the hotspot regions at the solid-fluid interface and we can also predict the heat transfer accurately for example- Conduction through solids, convection through fluid, and thermal radiation. It also provides the velocity and pressure distribution of fluid moving inside the solid. We can also use CHT in design optimization for improvement for heat transfer and cooling capacity.
2. A video card (also called a graphics card, display card, graphics adapter, or display adapter) is an expansion card that generates a feed of output images to a display device (such as a computer monitor). Most video cards are not limited to a 6-inch simple output. Their integrated graphics processor can perform additional processing, removing this task from the central processor of the computer.
lll. PROBLEM STATEMENT
lV. SPACECLAIM GEOMERTY
FINS
PROCESSOR
BASE
Topology is set to share such that the data could be shared between the different components of the graphics card.
V. INITIAL TEST - BASELINE SETUP
A. MESH
1. Named Selection
FINS
PROCESSOR
BASE
Encloser
2.1 Base Mesh
A basic mesh is generated using the standard values recommended by Ansys. This mesh is used to obtain an initial solution which will help us to determine the location where mesh refinement is required.
1.Element Order: Linear
2.Element size: Default
3.Number of Nodes: 12627
4.Number of Elements: 52375
2.2 Element Quality
We have some elements with quality less than 10%
B. Simulation Setup
1.Solver: Steady
2.Type: Pressure Based
3.Turbulence Model: k-Omega(SST)
4.Materials: Different materials are used for each part, some of which are custom created
Parts | Material |
Base | FR-4(Created) |
Fin | Aluminium |
Processor | Silicon(Created) |
Encloser | Air |
(1) FR-4
(2) Aluminium
(3) Silicon
(4) Air
5.Boundaries:
Type: Velocity Inlet
Velocity: 5m/s
Temperature: 300 K
Type: Pressure Outlet
Pressure: 0 Pa(Gauge Pressure)
Temperature: 300 K
6. Cell Zone Conditions
The processor is assumed as the only source of heat. The heat generated by the processor is calculated as:-
Graphics Card Power = 10W
Volume of the card = 8 x 8 x 1
= 64mm3=64e−9m3
Heat Generated = PV=1064e−9
= 1.5625e8Wm3
7. Solution
8. Simulation Output
1. Residual
C. Post Processing
1. Global Hotspot Region
2. Hotspot Around the Processor
3. Wall Heat Transfer Coefficient
4. Velocity Contour
Vl. REFINED MESH
A. MESH
1.Element Order: Linear
2.Element size: 0.003 m
3. Body Sizing (Fin)
4. Body Sizing (Processor)
5. Body Sizing (Base)
6.Number of Nodes: 88448
7.Number of Elements: 429838
B. SIMULATION SETUP
The simulation setup is the same as that selected for the initial mesh. Only the output of the simulation will change because of the change in the inlet velocities.
C. SIMULATION OUTPUT
VELOCITY = 1m/s | VELOCITY = 3m/s | VELOCITY = 5m/s | |
RESIDUALS | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
D. POST-PROCESSING
VELOCITY = 1m/s | VELOCITY = 3m/s | VELOCITY = 5m/s | |
Global Hotspot Region | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hotspot Around the Processor | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Wall Heat Transfer Coefficient | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Velocity Contour | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Vll. RESULTS
Velocity | The temperature at Processor [k] | The temperature at Fins [k] | HTC at Fins [Wm2k] |
1 | 587.18 | 580.28 | 256.94 |
3 | 438.78 | 431.88 | 258.47 |
5 | 402.95 | 396.20 | 262.49 |
Vlll. CONCLUSION
Leave a comment
Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all the comments are moderated as per our comment policy, and your email will not be published for privacy reasons. Please leave a personal & meaningful conversation.
Other comments...
Simulation Of A 1D Super-sonic Nozzle Using Macormack Method
AIM: To simulate the isentropic flow through a Quasi 1D subsonic - supersinic nozzle by deriving both the conservation and non-conservation forms of the governing equations and solve them by implementing Macormacks's technique using MATLAB. Objective: Determine the steady-state temperature distribution for the flow field…
19 Oct 2021 11:02 AM IST
Project 1 : CFD Meshing for Tesla Cyber Truck
ADVANCED CFD MESHING OF THE TESLA CYBER TRUCK l. OBJECTIVE 1. Geometry Clean-up of the model 2. Generation of surface mesh on the model. 3. Analyze and correct the quality of the mesh. 4. Setting…
08 Oct 2021 10:34 PM IST
Week 4 Challenge : CFD Meshing for BMW car
ADVANCED CFD MESHING OF THE BMW M6 MODEL USING ANSA l. OBJECTIVE 1. Detailed geometry clean-up of the BMW M6 Model. 2. Generation of a surface mesh on the model. 3. Analyze and correct the quality of the mesh. 4. Setting up a wind…
29 Sep 2021 10:51 PM IST
Related Courses
0 Hours of Content
Skill-Lync offers industry relevant advanced engineering courses for engineering students by partnering with industry experts.
© 2025 Skill-Lync Inc. All Rights Reserved.