All Courses
All Courses
Courses by Software
Courses by Semester
Courses by Domain
Tool-focused Courses
Machine learning
POPULAR COURSES
Success Stories
AIM:- To study mixing efficiency of mixing Tee for different Momentum ratio. Mixing Tee:- It is a device used in many mixing/diffusion process, and it also provide proper mixing of quantities to get desired result at output. As shown in above figure, by adjusting chilled air velocity, we can get desired output. Work…
Deepak Sharma
updated on 23 Dec 2020
AIM:- To study mixing efficiency of mixing Tee for different Momentum ratio.
Mixing Tee:- It is a device used in many mixing/diffusion process, and it also provide proper mixing of quantities to get desired result at output.
As shown in above figure, by adjusting chilled air velocity, we can get desired output.
Work flow of simulation:-
Here we see steps to follow to solve a CFD problem.
Case 1:- Short Tee
As per our simulation we are only interested in fluid flow analysis throught our short tee geometry, so we extract fluid volume from short tee geometry. Spaceclaim provide various option for extract the volume.
Goto Prepare -> Volume Extract -> Select edges
After extract flow volume, subpress for solid geometry so that it does not take part in mesh generation and futher simulation process.
b. Mesh Generation:-
In this step boundary naming also done. Boundary naming helps in for easy & correct visual of inlet/outlet and other geometry features so we can apply correct condition at correct place.
Mesh generation & element quality check is shown below-
we choose 1E-3 m element size.
Goto Mesh -> Quality -> Mesh Metric -> Element Quality
please check element quality should not be less than 5%.
c. Fluent Setup:-
At Fluent launcher choose Double precision option & solver process.
Condition 1:-
Short Tee with a hot inlet velocity of 3 m/s & Momentum ratio of 2
SETUP | K-epsilon | K-omega |
Solver Type | Pressure Based | Pressure Based |
Velocity Formulation | Absolute | Absolute |
Time | Steady | Steady |
Viscous Model | Realizable k-epsilon with standard wall function | k-omega SST model |
Material | Air | Air |
Cell Zones | ||
Volume_Volume | Fluid type- Air | Fluid type- Air |
Inlet x (velocity inlet) | Inlet x (velocity inlet) | |
Velocity Magnitude= 3 m/s | Velocity Magnitude= 3 m/s | |
Temp.= 36 degree C | Temp.= 36 degree C | |
Boundaries | Inlet y (velocity inlet) | Inlet y (velocity inlet) |
Velocity Magnitude= 6 m/s | Velocity Magnitude= 6 m/s | |
Temp.= 19 degree C | Temp.= 19 degree C | |
Outlet (pressure outlet) | Outlet (pressure outlet) | |
Gauge Pressure= 0 pas. | Gauge Pressure= 0 pas. | |
Walls= Stationary walls | Walls= Stationary walls |
After placing all input condition solution is initialize by Hybrid Initialization.
d. Results:-
For k-epsilon model For k-omega model
Residuals plot:-
Approx. 122 iterations taken to converge solution. Approx. 250 iterations taken to converge solution.
Average weighted area Plot for Temp.:-
From the above snap outlet temp. of mixture is 30.4 degree C. From the above snap outlet temp. of mixture is 30.5 degree C
Standard deviation plot:-
From the above snap standard deviation is 1.77 From the above snap standard deviation is 2.45
Contour plots:-
1) For Temp. distribution
2) For Velocity. distribution
Line plots:-
1) For Temp. distribution
2) For Velocity. distribution
Summary:- Short Tee with MR=2
K-epsilon | K-omega | |
Cell count | 573264 | 573264 |
Avg. Outlet Temp. | 30.4 degree C | 30.5 degree C |
No. of Iterations | approx. 122 | approx. 250 |
Standard deviation | 1.77 | 2.45 |
Short Tee with a hot inlet velocity of 3 m/s & Momentum ratio of 4
SETUP | K-epsilon | K-omega |
Solver Type | Pressure Based | Pressure Based |
Velocity Formulation | Absolute | Absolute |
Time | Steady | Steady |
Viscous Model | Realizable k-epsilon with standard wall function | k-omega SST model |
Material | Air | Air |
Cell Zones | ||
Volume_Volume | Fluid type- Air | Fluid type- Air |
Inlet x (velocity inlet) | Inlet x (velocity inlet) | |
Velocity Magnitude= 3 m/s | Velocity Magnitude= 3 m/s | |
Temp.= 36 degree C | Temp.= 36 degree C | |
Boundaries | Inlet y (velocity inlet) | Inlet y (velocity inlet) |
Velocity Magnitude= 12 m/s | Velocity Magnitude= 12 m/s | |
Temp.= 19 degree C | Temp.= 19 degree C | |
Outlet (pressure outlet) | Outlet (pressure outlet) | |
Gauge Pressure= 0 pas. | Gauge Pressure= 0 pas. | |
Walls= Stationary walls | Walls= Stationary walls |
After placing all input condition solution is initialize by Hybrid Initialization.
d. Results:-
For k-epsilon model For k-omega model
Residuals plot:-
Approx. 194 iterations taken to converge solution. Approx. 449 iterations taken to converge solution.
Average weighted area Plot for Temp.:-
From the above snap outlet temp. of mixture is 27.55 degree C From the above snap outlet temp. of mixture is 27.79 degree C
Standard deviation plot:-
From the above snap standard deviation is 1.26 From the above snap standard deviation is 1.99
Contour plots:-
1) For Temp. distribution
2) For Velocity. distribution
Line plots:-
1) For Velocity. distribution
Summary:- Short Tee with MR=4
K-epsilon | K-omega | |
Cell count | 573264 | 573264 |
Avg. Outlet Temp. | 27.55 degree C | 27.79 degree C |
No. of Iterations | approx. 194 | approx. 449 |
Standard deviation | 1.26 | 1.99 |
Conclusion:-
K-epsilon(MR=2) | K-omega(MR=2) | K-epsilon(MR=4) | K-omega(MR=4) | |
Cell count | 573264 | 573264 | 573264 | 573264 |
Avg. Outlet Temp. | 30.4 degree C | 30.5 degree C | 27.55 degree C | 27.79 degree C |
No. of Iterations | approx. 122 | approx. 250 | approx. 194 | approx. 449 |
Standard deviation | 1.77 | 2.45 | 1.26 | 1.99 |
1) For MR 2 & 4, Standard deviation of k-epsilon model is lower than k-omega model. Hence k-epsilon model has better mixing efficiency than k-omega model.
2) For MR 2 & 4, k-epsilon model takes less number of iterations than k-omega model. Hence k-epsilon model is faster to converge solutions.
Hence we use k-epsilon model for future calcutions because it is more accurate & take less time to converge.
Case 2:- Long Tee
As per our simulation we are only interested in fluid flow analysis throught our long tee geometry, so we extract fluid volume from long tee geometry. Spaceclaim provide various option for extract the volume.
Goto Prepare -> Volume Extract -> Select edges
After extract flow volume, subpress for solid geometry so that it does not take part in mesh generation and futher simulation process.
b. Mesh Generation:-
In this step boundary naming also done. Boundary naming helps in for easy & correct visual of inlet/outlet and other geometry features so we can apply correct condition at correct place.
Mesh generation & element quality check is shown below-
we choose 1E-2 m element size.
Goto Mesh -> Quality -> Mesh Metric -> Element Quality
please check element quality should not be less than 5%.
c. Fluent Setup:-
At Fluent launcher choose Double precision option & solver process.
Condition 1:-
Long Tee with a hot inlet velocity of 3 m/s & Momentum ratio of 2
SETUP | K-epsilon |
Solver Type | Pressure Based |
Velocity Formulation | Absolute |
Time | Steady |
Viscous Model | Realizable k-epsilon with standard wall function |
Material | Air |
Cell Zones | |
Volume_Volume | Fluid type- Air |
Inlet x (velocity inlet) | |
Velocity Magnitude= 3 m/s | |
Temp.= 36 degree C | |
Boundaries | Inlet y (velocity inlet) |
Velocity Magnitude= 6 m/s | |
Temp.= 19 degree C | |
Outlet (pressure outlet) | |
Gauge Pressure= 0 pas. | |
Walls= Stationary walls |
After placing all input condition solution is initialize by Hybrid Initialization.
d. Results:-
For k-epsilon model
Residuals plot:-
Approx. 239 iterations taken to converge solution.
Average weighted area Plot for Temp.:-
From the above snap outlet temp. of mixture is 30.28 degree C.
Standard deviation plot:-
From the above snap standard deviation is 1.17
Contour plots:-
1) For Temp. distribution
2) For Velocity. distribution
Line plots:-
1) For Velocity. distribution
Summary:- Long Tee with MR=2
K-epsilon | |
Cell count | 15368 |
Avg. Outlet Temp. | 30.28 degree C |
No. of Iterations | approx. 239 |
Standard deviation | 1.17 |
Long Tee with a hot inlet velocity of 3 m/s & Momentum ratio of 4
SETUP | K-epsilon |
Solver Type | Pressure Based |
Velocity Formulation | Absolute |
Time | Steady |
Viscous Model | Realizable k-epsilon with standard wall function |
Material | Air |
Cell Zones | |
Volume_Volume | Fluid type- Air |
Inlet x (velocity inlet) | |
Velocity Magnitude= 3 m/s | |
Temp.= 36 degree C | |
Boundaries | Inlet y (velocity inlet) |
Velocity Magnitude= 12 m/s | |
Temp.= 19 degree C | |
Outlet (pressure outlet) | |
Gauge Pressure= 0 pas. | |
Walls= Stationary walls |
After placing all input condition solution is initialize by Hybrid Initialization.
d. Results:-
For k-epsilon model
Residuals plot:-
Approx. 121 iterations taken to converge solution.
Average weighted area Plot for Temp.:-
From the above snap outlet temp. of mixture is 27.49 degree C.
Standard deviation plot:-
From the above snap standard deviation is 0.75
Contour plots:-
1) For Temp. distribution
2) For Velocity. distribution
Line plots:
1) For Velocity. distribution
Summary:- Long Tee with MR=4
K-epsilon | |
Cell count | 15368 |
Avg. Outlet Temp. | 27.49 degree C |
No. of Iterations | approx. 121 |
Standard deviation | 0.75 |
K-epsilon (MR= 2) | K-epsilon (MR= 4) | |
Cell count | 15368 | 15368 |
Avg. Outlet Temp. | 30.28 degree C | 27.49 degree C |
No. of Iterations | approx. 239 | approx. 121 |
Standard deviation | 1.17 | 0.75 |
Conclusion:-
Short Tee | Long Tee | |||
K-epsilon(MR=2) | K-epsilon(MR=4) | K-epsilon(MR=2) | K-epsilon(MR=4) | |
Cell count | 573264 | 573264 | 15368 | 15368 |
Avg. Outlet Temp. | 30.4 degree C | 27.55 degree C | 30.28 degree C | 27.49 degree C |
No. of Iterations | approx. 122 | approx. 194 | approx. 239 | approx. 121 |
Standard deviation | 1.77 | 1.26 | 1.17 | 0.75 |
1) As we see in above table long tee outlet temp. is approx similar to short tree in respective MR, hence longer length does not have significant effect on efficiency of mixing tee.
2) The tee mixing effectiveness increases when the velocity of the cold inlet fluid increases. Hence MR 4 has better effectiveness than 2.
3) From the grid independence test, we can conclude that the finer the size mesh, the better the accuracy of the solution. Hence at the finer grid size, we got better mixing efficiency. But at the same time, computional time increases significantly.
Leave a comment
Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all the comments are moderated as per our comment policy, and your email will not be published for privacy reasons. Please leave a personal & meaningful conversation.
Other comments...
Design of backdoor
Design of backdoor Aim- To design the outer upper & lower panel, inner panel with the necessary reinforcemets by following the Master section with the design parameter for the given class A surface. Introduction- A door is a hinged part which is used for entry & exit of the vehicles. Back doors are one of…
01 Aug 2021 11:04 AM IST
Roof challenge
Roof challenge- Objectives:- Design the roof from the given styling surface with front & rear roof rails. Create the Bow roof rails & center Bow with reinforcement. Do a curvature study on the roof & validate the design by applying the Heat distortion criteria & snow load criteria. Perform the section modulus.…
13 Jul 2021 05:13 PM IST
Hood design-Week 2
HOOD DESIGN- CHALLANGE Introduction:- Hood is main component of a car at the front portion. It is used to decorate the car & add luxurious look. The shape of the bonnet is made aerodynamic in order to minimize the air effect. Hood design consideration:- The hood of a car is considered as the frontal BIW enclosure component.…
24 Jun 2021 01:14 PM IST
Fender Design Challenge
Fender Design Challenge:- Introduction- Fender is the part of an automobile that frames a wheel well. Its primary purpose is to prevent sand, mud, rocks, liquids & other road spray from being thrown into the air by the rotating tire. Fenders are typically rigid & can be damaged by contact with the road surface.…
18 Jun 2021 08:16 AM IST
Related Courses
0 Hours of Content
Skill-Lync offers industry relevant advanced engineering courses for engineering students by partnering with industry experts.
© 2025 Skill-Lync Inc. All Rights Reserved.