All Courses
All Courses
Courses by Software
Courses by Semester
Courses by Domain
Tool-focused Courses
Machine learning
POPULAR COURSES
Success Stories
Objective:The aim of this study is to calculate the Mooney Rivlin and Ogden material constants and compare them using stress-strain data obtained from a Dogbone specimen tensile test with 100 percent strain.Background:Hyperelastic materials are defined as materials that can undergo more than 100% strain without experiencing…
Kartik Patil
updated on 22 Aug 2024
Objective:
The aim of this study is to calculate the Mooney Rivlin and Ogden material constants and compare them using stress-strain data obtained from a Dogbone specimen tensile test with 100 percent strain.
Background:
Hyperelastic materials are defined as materials that can undergo more than 100% strain without experiencing failure. These materials are challenging to replicate due to their high strain values and typically have a Poisson's ratio close to 0.5. Various material models such as Mooney Rivlin, Ogden, and Yeoh are commonly used to describe the behavior of these materials. These models define the materials using strain energy versus stretch relationships, with strain energy represented by the area under the stress-strain curve. In this study, we will focus on modeling the Mooney Rivlin and Ogden materials using the provided stress-strain data.
PROCEDURE:
1. Create the given data in excel file.
plot
2. Import the dogbone specimen in Ls Dyna.
Mooney Rivlin Material
check the model and then head for simulation
Analysis setup for Curve Fit:-
1.For N=1
1. Save the Keyword and run the Model In Ls Dyna manager
2. Open the d3hsp File in Notepad++ for Mooney Rivlin COnstants
3. From The d3hsp file, Mooney Rivlin constants are obtained along with the Stretch and true stress value
C10=0.1768E+00
C01=0.1474E+00
The stretch and True Stress values are converted into Engineering Strain and Engineering stress values
Stretch is Change in length by original Length which is denoted by λ𝜆λ
Engineering Strain=λ−1𝜆-1λ−1
Engineering Stress= True stress/1+Engineering Strain
2. For N=2:-
1. Change N=2 from the Material card and Run the simulation again
2. Open the d3hsp File in Notepad++ for Mooney Rivlin COnstants
3. From The d3hsp file, Mooney Rivlin constants are obtained along with the Stretch and true stress values
C10=0.2595000
C01=0.4594E-01
C11=-0.2092E-01
C20=0.2914E-02
C02=0.1016E-02
C30=0.0000E+00
Similarly, the Stretch and True stress values are converted to Engineering Strain and Engineering stress values
3.For N=3:-
Change N=3 from the Material card and Run the simulation again
2. Open the d3hsp File in Notepad++ for Mooney Rivlin Constants
3. From The d3hsp file, Mooney Rivlin constants are obtained along with the Stretch and true stress values
C10=0.2611E+00
C01=0.4420E-01
C11=-0.6074E-02
C20=-0.2667E-02
C02=-0.9968E-02
C30=0.1565E-03
Similarly, the Stretch and True stress values are converted to Engineering Strain and Engineering stress values
As we can see all the Constant values obtained from the d3hsp file is fitting with the Original Data
So from this, we can conclude all the Constants will Give similar results in compared with the original data
Material Validation:-
Change N=0 in the Material card and input the Mooney Rivlin Constants Individually Obtained from N=1, N=2, N=3 and validate
Constants from N=1 Constants From N=2:
Constants From N=3
The Simulation is Done Individually with The Constants Obtained from N=1, N=2, N=3
The True Stress and Strain Values Obtained from the Element is Converted to Engineering Stress/ strain
The Constants From N=1,2,3 are plotted with original Data
Conclusion
The results show that the Ogden material is more compressed in this simulation compared to the Hyperelastic material. Both materials exhibit similar properties. The Hyperelastic material provides a more accurate fit compared to the Ogden material, and the fit remains constant for all parameters.
Leave a comment
Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all the comments are moderated as per our comment policy, and your email will not be published for privacy reasons. Please leave a personal & meaningful conversation.
Other comments...
Week 2 Air standard Cycle
AIMWe are currently working on developing code for the air standard Otto cycle to extract the pressure versus volume diagram and calculate the thermal efficiency of the cycle.The ideal Otto cycle is a thermodynamic cycle that describes how a spark-ignition internal combustion engine works. It consists of four…
14 Sep 2024 07:27 AM IST
week-11 Joint creation and Demonstration
Aim:demonstrate spherical, revolute, cylindrical, and translational joints between two rigid bodies and two deformable bodies. 2. Revolute jointTwo pairs of nodes are created for constraining, using Node edit option under Element Tools. The nodes 101, 102 are constrained to part 1 and 103,104 to part 2 respectively, using…
06 Sep 2024 04:53 PM IST
Week - 10 Hyperelastic Material Models
Objective:The aim of this study is to calculate the Mooney Rivlin and Ogden material constants and compare them using stress-strain data obtained from a Dogbone specimen tensile test with 100 percent strain.Background:Hyperelastic materials are defined as materials that can undergo more than 100% strain without experiencing…
22 Aug 2024 02:10 PM IST
CRASH BOX SIMULATION USING LS DYNA
OBJECTIVE In this challenge we have to perform a simulation of crash box it similar to car carsh. but, here instead of car and their element there is box like structure. Here are the information about challenge - The crashbox should crash into a rigidwall created using *RIGIDWALL_ keyword. Check the manual to understand…
08 Nov 2022 04:09 AM IST
Related Courses
Skill-Lync offers industry relevant advanced engineering courses for engineering students by partnering with industry experts.
© 2025 Skill-Lync Inc. All Rights Reserved.