Challenge

Project-1: Powertrain for aircraft in runways

Search and list out the total weight of various types of aircraft.

​

MTOW-Maximum Take off weight

MLW-Maximum Landing Weight

Type

MTOW [kg]

MLW [tons]

Antonov An-225

640,000

591.7

Scaled Composites Model 351 Stratolaunch

589,670

Airbus A380-800[1][2]

575,000

394

Boeing 747-8F

447,700

346.091

Boeing 747-8

443,613

306.175

Boeing 747-400ER

412,770

295.742

Antonov An-124-100M

405,060

330

Boeing 747-400

396,900

295.742

Lockheed C-5 Galaxy[3][4][5]

381,000

288.417

Boeing 747-200[6]

377,840

285.700

Boeing 747-300[6]

377,840

260.320

Airbus A340-500[7]

371,950

240

Airbus A340-600[7]

367,400

256

Boeing 777F

347,800

260.816

Boeing 777-300ER

351,800

251.29

Boeing 777-200LR

347,450

223.168

Boeing 747-100[6]

340,200

265.300

Airbus A350-1000

308,000

233.5

Boeing 777-300

299,370

237.683

Boeing 777-200ER

297,550

213.00

Airbus A340-300[7][8]

276,700

190

McDonnell Douglas MD-11

273,300

185

Airbus A350-900

270,000

175

Ilyushin Il-96M

270,000

195.04

McDonnell Douglas DC-10

256,280

183

Boeing 787-9[9]

254,000

192.777

Boeing 787-10[9]

254,000

201.849

Airbus A340-200[7][10]

253,500

181

Ilyushin IL-96-300

250,000

175

Airbus A330-300[11][12]

242,000

185

Airbus A330-200[11][12]

242,000

180

Lockheed L-1011-500

231,300

166.92

Boeing 787-8[9]

228,000

172.365

Lockheed L-1011-200

211,400

Ilyushin IL-86

208,000

175

Boeing 767-400ER

204,000

158.758

Airbus A300-600R[13]

192,000

140

Boeing 767-300ER

187,000

136.08

Concorde

185,000

111.1

Airbus A300-600[13]

163,000

138

Boeing 767-300

159,000

136.078

Airbus A310-300[13]

157,000

124

Vickers VC10

152,000

151.9

Boeing 707-320B[14]

151,000

97.5

Boeing 707-320C[14]

151,000

112.1

Douglas DC-8-61

147,000

Airbus A310-200[13]

142,000

123

Airbus A400M

141,000

122

Douglas DC-8-32

140,000

Douglas DC-8-51

125,000

Boeing 757-300

124,000

101.6

Boeing 707-120B[14]

117,000

86.3

Boeing 757-200

116,000

89.9

Boeing 720B[15]

106,000

79.5

Boeing 720[15]

104,000

79.5

Tupolev Tu-154M

104,000

80

Tupolev Tu-204SM

104,000

87.5

Convair 880

87,500

Boeing 737-900

85,000

66.36

Boeing 737-900ER

85,000

71.35

Boeing 727-200 Advanced[16]

84,000

70.1

Airbus A321-100[17]

83,000

77.8

Boeing 737-800

79,000

65.32

Boeing 727-200[16]

78,000

68.1

McDonnell-Douglas MD-83

73,000

63.28

Boeing 727-100[16]

72,500

62.4

Boeing 727-100C[16]

72,500

62.4

McDonnell-Douglas MD-90-30

71,000

64.41

de Havilland Comet 4

70,700

Boeing 737-700

70,000

58.06

Airbus A320-100[17]

68,000

66

Boeing 737-400

68,000

54.9

de Havilland Comet 3

68,000

Boeing 377

67,000

Boeing 737-600

66,000

54.66

Airbus A220-300

65,000

57.61

Hawker Siddeley Trident 2E

65,000

Airbus A319[17]

64,000

62.5

Boeing 737-300

63,000

51.7

Boeing 737-500

60,000

49.9

Airbus A220-100

59,000

50.80

Airbus A318[17]

59,000

57.5

Boeing 717-200HGW

55,000

47.174

Douglas DC-7

55,000

de Havilland Comet 2

54,000

Boeing 717-200BGW

50,000

46.265

de Havilland Comet 1

50,000

Douglas DC-6A

48,600

Douglas DC-6B

48,500

Embraer 190[18]

48,000

43

Caravelle III

46,000

Fokker 100

46,000

39.95

Douglas DC-6

44,000

Avro RJ-85

42,000

36.74

Handley Page Hermes

39,000

Embraer 175[19]

37,500

32.8

Bombardier CRJ900[20]

36,500

33.345

Embraer 170[21]

36,000

32.8

Bombardier CRJ700

33,000

30.39

Douglas DC-4

33,000

Vickers Viscount 800

30,400

Bombardier Q400

28,000

28.01

Bombardier CRJ200

23,000

21.319

ATR 72-600

22,800

22.35

Saab 2000

22,800

21.5

Embraer ERJ 145

22,000

19.3

ATR 42-500

18,600

18.3

Saab 340

13,150

12.930

Embraer 120 Brasilia

11,500

11.25

BAe Jetstream 41

10,890

10.570

Learjet 75[22]

9,752

8.709

Pilatus PC-24[23]

8,300

7.665

Embraer Phenom 300[24]

8,150

7.65

Beechcraft 1900D

7,765

7.605

Cessna Citation CJ4[25]

7,761

7.103

de Havilland Hercules

7,000

Embraer Phenom 100

4,800

4.43

Maximum takeoff weight (MTOW)

The maximum takeoff weight (also known as the maximum brake-release weight) is the maximum weight authorized at brake release for takeoff, or at the start of the takeoff roll.

Maximum landing weight (MLW)

The maximum weight authorized for the normal landing of an aircraft.The MLW must not exceed the MTOW.

The operation landing weight may be limited to a weight lower than the Maximum Landing Weight by the most restrictive of the following requirements:

  • Aircraft performance requirements for a given altitude and temperature: landing field length requirements, approach and landing climb requirements
  • Noise requirements

2..................

Airspeed

The important quantity in lift generation is the relative velocity between the object and the air, called airspeed. Airspeed cannot be directly measured from a ground position but must be computed from the ground speed and the wind speed. Airspeed is the vector diffrence between the ground speed and the wind speed.

Airspeed = Ground Speed - Wind Speed

On a perfectly still day, the airspeed is equal to the ground speed. But if the wind is blowing in the same direction that the aircraft is moving, the airspeed will be less than the ground speed.

Ground Speed

For a reference point picked on the ground, the aircraft moves relative to the reference point at the ground speed. Ground speed is also a vector quantity so a comparison of the ground speed to the wind speed must be done according to rules for vector comparison

Wind Speed

For a reference point picked on the ground, the air moves relative to the reference point at the wind speed. Notice that the wind speed is a vector quantity and has both a magnitude and a direction. Direction is important. A 20 mph wind from the west is different from a 20 mph wind from the east. The wind has components in all three primary directions (north-south, east-west, and up-down). In this figure, we are considering only velocities along the aircraft's flight path. A positive velocity is defined to be in the direction of the aircraft's motion. We are neglecting cross wind which occurs perpendicular to the flight path but parallel to the ground, and updrafts and downdrafts, which occur perpendicular to the ground.

For Example- If the Airspeed of an aircraft is 600km/h, whereas the wind speed is 200km/h in the same direction as airspeed. Then the ground speed will be (600+200)= 800km/h, which is explained in Fig-2. But if the wind speed of 100km/h is in the opposite direction of airspeed, then the ground speed will be (600-200)= 400km/h,

3.................................

The risks which may arise from engine ground running relate to the potential for loss of control of the aircraft by those persons occupying the pilot seats in the flight deck. Unwanted consequences from such static running are mainly related to those arising from the unintended movement of the aircraft during engine running - effectively a loss of control - especially during high power engine running. Damage can occur to the aircraft itself, other aircraft nearby or to airside structures. In addition, there is a risk of injury to ground support personnel who may be in relatively close proximity to the aircraft.

When modern jet engines are operated at rated thrust levels, the exhaust wake can exceed 375 mi/h (325 kn or 603 km/h) immediately aft of the engine exhaust nozzle. This exhaust flow field extends aft in a rapidly expanding cone, with portions of the flow field contacting and extending aft along the pavement surface (fig. 1). Exhaust velocity components are attenuated with increasing distance from the engine exhaust nozzle. However, an airflow of 300 mi/h (260 kn or 483 km/h) can still be present at the empennage, and significant people and equipment hazards will persist hundreds of feet beyond this area. At full power, the exhaust wake speed can typically be 150 mi/h (130 kn or 240 km/h) at 200 ft (61 m) beyond the airplane and 50 to 100 mi/h (43 to 88 kn or 80 to 161 km/h) well beyond this point.

The extensive noise that arises from the engine power also dangerous for humans and other living things around the vicinity.

Hence for the above reasons, it is not recommended to use engine power to move on the ground.

4.......................

In aviation, pushback is an airport procedure during which an aircraft's pushed backward away from an airport gate by an external power. Pushbacks are carried out by special, low-profile vehicles called pushback tractors or tugs.

Although many aircraft are capable of moving themselves backward on the ground using reverse thrust (a procedure referred to as a powerback), the resulting jet blast or propwash might cause damage to the terminal building or equipment. Engines close to the ground may also blow sand and debris forward and then suck them into the engine, causing damage to the engine. A pushback is therefore the preferred method to move the aircraft away from the gate.

As the pilot can't see what is behind the aircraft, steering is done by pushback tractor driver and depending on the aircraft type and airline procedure, a bypass pin may be temporarily installed into the nose gear to disconnect it from the aircraft's normal steering mechanism. Once the towing is completed, the towbar is disconnected and the aircraft can taxiing forward under its own power.

5......................

Take-Off Power:

For light aircraft, usually, full power is used during takeoff. Large transport category (airliner) aircraft may use a reduced power for takeoff, where less than full power is applied in order to prolong engine life, reduce maintenance costs and reduce noise emissions. In some emergency cases, the power used can then be increased to increase the aircraft's performance. Before takeoff, the engines, particularly piston engines, are routinely run up at high power to check for engine-related problems. The aircraft is permitted to accelerate to rotation speed (often referred to as Vr). The term rotation is used because the aircraft pivots around the axis of its main landing gear while still on the ground, usually because of gentle manipulation of the flight controls to make or facilitate this change in aircraft attitude (once proper air displacement occurs under/over the wings, an aircraft will lift off on its own; controls are to ease that in).

The nose is raised to a nominal 5°–15° nose-up pitch attitude to increase lift from the wings and effect liftoff. For most aircraft, attempting a takeoff without a pitch-up would require cruise speeds while still on the runway.

(ii)Tyre Design>> An aircraft tire is designed to withstand extremely heavy loads for short duration of time. The number of tires required for aircraft increases with the weight of the aircraft, as the weight of the airplane needs to be distributed more evenly. For example -A Boeing 737NG & 737MAX uses 6 wheels, Boeing 787 uses 10 wheels, Boeing 777 uses 14 wheels and Airbus A380 uses 22 wheels.

Aircraft tires also include fusible plugs (which are assembled on the inside of the wheels), designed to melt at a certain temperature. Tires often overheat if maximum braking is applied during an aborted takeoff or an emergency landing. The fuses provide a safer failure mode that prevents tire explosions by deflating in a controlled manner, thus minimizing damage to aircraft and objects in the surrounding environment.

Designing aircraft tires is a very intense undertaking. Carcass plies are used to form the tire. They are sometimes called casing plies. An aircraft tyre is constructed for the purpose it serves.

(i)They support the weight of an aircraft while it is on the ground.

(ii)It also provides the necessary traction for braking and stopping of an airplane.

(iii)Tyre also helps to absorb the shock of landing and provides cushioning the roughness of takeoff, roll-out, and taxi operations.

(iii)Rolling Resistance>>
In addition to the familiar forces like thrust, weight, lift, and drag there is a rolling resistance force FR caused by friction between tire and the ground. When aircraft is towing or taxing to pushed it into runway or when a take-off roll is happening, the rolling resistance force act against the traction force of the aircraft. This rolling resistance force depends on many factors like surface of the road, the roughness of the road, dry or wet condition of the road, tire pressure, tyre material tyre temperature, thread pattern of the tire etc, which determines the rolling resistance force.

Rolling resistance force = FR in Newton Rolling resistance co-efficient = urr (It varies for different types of the environment)

Tyre Pressure:

Aircraft tires are usually inflated with nitrogen to minimize expansion and contraction from extreme changes in ambient temperature and pressure experienced during flight. Dry nitrogen expands at the same rate as other dry atmospheric gases (normal air is about 80% nitrogen), but common compressed air sources may contain moisture, which increases the expansion rate with temperature.

Tests of airliner aircraft tires have shown that they are able to sustain pressures of a maximum 800 psi (55 bar; 5,500 kPa) before bursting. During the tests the tires have to be filled with water, to prevent the test room being blown apart by the energy that would be released by a gas when the tire bursts.

Brakes Forces When Landing:

In general, when the wheels touch the ground, a set of spoilers raise up quickly, which kills the lift provided by the wings. (There are two sets seen in the image below: ground spoilers that only deploy on landing, and spoilers that are used in flight as speed brakes as well as on landing.) While the spoilers provide some drag, their primary purpose is to stop the plane from actually flying, putting all of the weight on the landing gear and in turn making the brakes that much more effective.

Aircraft have highly engineered, multi-disc brakes made of a carbon-steel material. Manufacturers include Honeywell and Goodrich, part of Collins Aerospace. In general, the brakes are composed of discs that rotate with the wheel and separate discs that are fixed. When pressure is applied—and below you see pressure applied from the right fixed disc on all of the discs—the entire assembly compresses to create the braking action. Carbon brakes are standard today; they cool faster than steel brakes (their predecessor) and can weigh up to 700 pounds less. That represents a significant weight saving for airlines.

Auto Brakes:

Wheel brakes are usually selected to engage automatically after landing. These are called “auto brakes”.that all airliners have several levels of auto brake “severity”. The crew will decide which is the most appropriate to use for every landing depending upon factors like the length of the runway, if it is wet or dry, or if the pilots want to exit the runway at a particular point. “For a short wet runway, you might select autobrake 3, or MED on the Airbus. For a long dry runway you might select autobrake 1 or LOW on the Airbus".

6...................

Rolling resistance force:- As we have discussed in part-A 5c. It is the force resisting the motion when a body (such as a ball, tire, or wheel) rolls on a surface. Its governing equation is given as

now the model made to find power using simulink

b----modle

7...........................................

Electric Vehicles, consist of a battery, connected to an electric motor (either AC or DC) via an inverter and a motor controller. As automotive batteries generally operate on DC current, while the gird operates AC, a converter is needed to transfer power to the battery.One of the key advantages of an EV is its much higher levels of energy efficiency. Typically an EV will achieve a system efficiency of 80% from battery to wheel (roughly 60% from grid to wheel), while with a conventional IC engine it’s more like 15-25%. This is largely due to the fact that an IC engine is a “heat engine”

Based on the calculations done in 6

Force required to push/pull the aircraft =29.824KN

Power required =82.84 kw

Let us assume,

The Radius of the Tyre for the Tug = 25inches =0.635m

Gear ratio = 8

Transmission Effeciency (ηt) =87%

Motor Efficiency (ηm)=95%

then,

Torque required for the wheels (Tw)=Total Force *Radius in meters

=29.824*0.635

= 18.938KNm

Motor Torque= Wheel torque/(Gear ratio*ηt)

= 18.938 / (8*0.87)

= 2.720KNm

For ηm =95%, The required motor Torque (Tm)= 2.720/0.95 =2.863 kNm

Similarly, The total power required by the motor considering all the efficiencies(Pt) = 82.84/(0.87*0.95)=68.467Kw

Let us assume the towing operation was done for a 15 minutes (0.25Hrs) duration.

Then, Total Energy consumed = 68.467*0.25 = 17.11 KWh

this is the graph representing the wave form of voltage ,soc and current a bus block which is connected to the battery which provided supply to the modle

this graph represent all the wave form of current, duty cycle,speed ,armature voltage these are all connected to dc7 block and these are the results from the scope

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.