Challenge

Week 1- Mixing Tee

Aim:

To set up steady-state simulations to compare the mixing effectiveness when hot inlet temperature is 360C & the Cold inlet is at 190C.

Use the k-epsilon and k-omega SST model for the first case and based on your judgment use the more suitable model for further cases.

  1. Case 1
    • Short mixing tee with a hot inlet velocity of 3m/s.
    • Momentum ratio of 2, 4.
  2. Case 2
    • Long mixing tee with a hot inlet velocity of 3m/s.
    • Momentum ratio of 2, 4.

Objectives:

  1. Cell count
  2. Average outlet temperature
  3. Number of iterations for convergence

and plot the expected results of

  1. Velocity and temperature contour plots on the cut planes along and across the pipe.
  2. Velocity and temperature line plots along and across the length of the pipe.
  3. Perform Mesh independent study for any one case.
  4. Discuss the effect of length and momentum ratio on results.

Procedure:

  1. Open the Ansys workbench and use the fluid flow (fluent) module from the analysis systems available.
  2. Import the required geometry and check if the geometry is updated and use the suppress for physics option to suppress the parts of the geometry that are not actually needed for the analysis.And extract the volume in which the simulation takes place of the tee geometry using the volume extract option under prepare and exit the geometry.
  3. Now select the mesh and create a named selection for the inlet ,outlet, and walls ,so that it is easier for the workbench to simulate.Then mesh the geometry by providing the required element size and use the quality of mesh detail and select the element quality to know how the mesh has been applied to the geometry and exit the mesh.
  4. Open the setup ,you can see the console runs to create the geometry.Now set up the physics of the simulation using the viscous model option and select the required model for the simulation. Set the boundary conditions for the inlet and outlet using the boundaries under zones. Select the energy dialog box to apply the temperature conditions in the simulation.
  5. Now under the solution select the required result you want to see by using the defenition function and select the hybrid method for the simulation and initialize t=0 nad set the required number of iterations and select calculate to start the simulation.
  6. Now then exit the setup and open the result for the post processing of the simulation results.Select only the walls and suppress all other parameters and cretae a plane in the mid of the Tee geometry and adjust the transparency of the geometry and change colour of the geometry until you feel the result is properly visible.
  7. Now then change the different variable parameters to find the results.

Results for K - epsilon method:

Short pipe

momentum ratio -2

cell count - 12613

The mesh:

Residulas vs Iterations:

Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:

Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:

Temperature contour :

Velocity contour:

Results for K- omega method:

Short pipe

momentum ratio -2

cell count - 12613

Residulas vs Iterations:

Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:

Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:

Temperature contour :

Velocity contour:

The above results represent the simulation of the geometry with k-omega sst model.

K-Epsilon:

K-epsilon (k-ε) turbulence model is the most common model used in computational fluid dynamics(CFD) to simulate mean flow characteristics for turbulent flow conditions. It is a two-equation model that gives a general description of turbulence by means of two transport equations.

K- omega:

In computational fluid dynamics, the k–omega (k–ω) turbulence model is a common two-equation turbulence model, that is used as an approximation for the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations (RANS equations). The model attempts to predict turbulence by two partial differential equations for two variables, k and ω, with the first variable being the turbulence kinetic energy (k) while the second (ω) is the specific rate of dissipation.

Difference:

K epsilon is best suited for flow away from the wall, say free surface flow region, whereas k-omega model is best suited for near the wall flow region, where adverse pressure gradient is developed.

The ''k-w'' turbulent model is suitable when you study the behavior ONLY closed to the wall (Boundary), however if you are not interested near-wall flow behavior you can use ''k-epsilon'' using enhanced wall function for higher velocity on the boundaries.
The combination of both models you will find as ''k-w SST'' which you can study the flow behavior near and far from the wall.
In this case we are not dealing with walls ,so we use K- epsilon method to compute the simulation.
Case 1-b: short pipe, momentum ratio 4:

Short pipe

momentum ratio -4

cell count - 12613

Residuals:
Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:
Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:
Temperature contour :
Velocity contour:
case 1- c: with different cell count on short tee pipe for momentum ratio 2:-

Short pipe

momentum ratio -2

cell count - 22296

Residuals:
Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:
Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:
Temperature contour :
Velocity contour:
Case 1 -d: Short pipe , momentum ratio 4 with different cell count:

Short pipe

momentum ratio -4

cell count - 22296

Residuals:
Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:
Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:
Temperature contour :
Velocity contour:
case 2: Long pipe momentum ratio 4 :

Long pipe

momentum ratio -2

cell count - 15727

Residuals:
Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:
Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:
Temperature contour :
Velocity contour:
Case 2- b: Long tee pipe ,momentum ratio 2 :

Short pipe

momentum ratio -2

cell count - 15727

Residuals:
Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:
Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:
Temperature contour :
Velocity contour:
Case 2 - c : Long tee pipe , momentum ratio 2 with different cell count:

Long pipe

momentum ratio -2

cell count - 56670

Residuals:
Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:
Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:
Temperature contour :
Velocity contour:
Case 2 - d:

Short pipe

momentum ratio -2

cell count - 56670

Long tee pipe, momentum ratio 4 with different cell count:
Residuals:
Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:
Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:
Temperature contour :
Velocity contour:
Mesh Independency on case 1:
Mesh Independency test is run on the short Tee of momentum ratio 2,where the sizing of the mesh parameter has been changed .The number of division on the sizing method is set to 100 so the mesh is much more refined than the default meshing and plots are below.
case 1: short pipe momentum ratio 2,k- epsilon:

Short pipe

momentum ratio -2

cell count - 44250

Residuals:
Area weighted average of temperature vs Iterations:
Standard deviation of temperature vs Iterations:
Temperature contour:
Velocity Contour:
Result Tabulation:
Pipe momentum ratio cell count average temperature outlet(C)
short 2 12613 30.23
short 4 12613 27.55
short 2 22296 30.26
short 4 22296 27.56
long 2 15727 30.261
long 4 15727 27.49
long 2 56670 30.31
long 4 56670 27.53
Effectiveness of Mixing :
In order to calculate effectiveness of mixing we calculate standard deviation of temperature at outlet of mixing tee.
A high standard deviation means we are getting bad mixing,in contrary for low deviation we get a better mixing.
Conclusion:
Ansys Fluent is the industry-leading fluid simulation software known for its advanced physics modeling capabilities and industry leading accuracy.In this study we performed simulation of mixing hot and cold air moving at different speeds on a simple geometry .
We can conclude that the momentum ratio influences the outlet temperature of the simulation as the velocity of the inlet cold air is increased the outlet temperature is low.
The length of the pipe doesn't significantlly show any change in the results it gives similar result as the short pipe, but in real case in long pipe the diffusion rate is higher compared to short pipe.
Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.