Challenge

Steady Vs Unsteady flow over a cylinder

Steady and Unsteady Flow over Cylinder

Objective

To design the geometry and simulate the flow of air over the cylinder and to explain the Karman Vortex Street phenomenon.

3D Model

The 3D model comprises of the 2D cylinder and the boundary conditions such that the vortex shedding could be clearly visible behind the cylinder. The conditions for the boundary conditions are:

Inlet Boundary = 10 × Dcyl (m)

Outlet Boundary = 20 × Dcyl (m)

Symmetric Wall = 3 + Dcyl (m)

Where, Dcyl = 2 m

Fig.1. Cylinder and Boundary Geometry

Mesh Details

Finer element sizes allow us to visualize vortex shedding when it occurs even at lower inlet velocities. Mesh size of 0.075 m is being used throughout the analysis. Th cylinder wall is divided into 36 divisions, and inflation of 10 layers with 1.2 growth rate is used at the cylinder wall to obtain uniform mesh and smooth contours at the boundary. The high element quality, orthogonal quality and the lowest skewness of element depicts a good mesh being obtained.

Table 1: Mesh Details

PARAMETERS

SPECIFICATIONS

MESH TYPE

ALL QUAD

MESH SIZE

0.075 m

ELEMENTS

105419

NODES

106377

INFLATION LAYER

10

INFLATION GROWTH RATE

1.2

EDGE SIZING – NUMBER OF DIVISIONS

36

Fig.2.1. Fluid Volume Mesh

Fig.2.2. Inflation Layer

Fig.2.3. Element Quality

Fig.2.4. Orthogonal Quality

Fig.2.5. Skewness

Material Properties

Air is chosen as the fluid passing through the cylinder, having its default values.

Density (ρ) = 1.225 kg/m3

Reynold’s Number (Re) = 10, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000

Viscosity (ν) = 1.7894×10-5 kg/m-s

Boundary Conditions

To obtain various Reynold’s Number, the fluid inlet velocity was varied. The initial conditions are mentioned below:

Inlet velocity (v) = 7.304×10-5 to 7.304×10-1 m/s

Outlet pressure = 0 Pa

Model Equations

Laminar and K-Ω SST were used to determine the steady and unsteady flow conditions respectively, around the cylinder. For higher Reynold’s Number, K-Ω SST model equations were used as it provides detailed contours of various parameters in the cylinder wall boundary.

Results

Case 1: Calculation of Strouhal Number for Re = 100 under steady and unsteady conditions.

Steady Condition

Residual

Vertex Averaged Velocity Magnitude

Vertex Averaged Pressure

Coefficient of Lift

Coefficient of Drag

Pressure Contour

Velocity Contour

Lift Coefficient Frequency

Under steady conditions, the coefficient of lift doesn’t oscillate to provide a frequency. Thus, Strouhal Number is zero.

Frequency (f) = 0 Hz

Diameter (d) = 2 m

Fluid Velocity (u) = 7.3037×10-4 m/s

St = = 0

Unsteady Condition

Residual

Vertex Averaged Velocity Magnitude

Vertex Averaged Pressure

Coefficient of Lift

Coefficient of Drag

Pressure Contour

Velocity Contour

Lift Coefficient Frequency

Under unsteady conditions, the coefficient of lift oscillates to provide a frequency.

Frequency (f) = 1.425×10-9 Hz

Diameter (d) = 2 m

Fluid Velocity (u) = 7.3037×10-4 m/s

St = = = 3.902×10-6

Case 2: Calculation of coefficient of lift and drag with Re = 10, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000.

Re = 10

To obtain Re = 10, the inlet fluid velocity is 7.3037×10-5 m/s. The calculation was done for 1000 iterations.

Residuals

Vertex Averaged Velocity Magnitude

Vertex Averaged Pressure

Lift Coefficient

The lift coefficient (CL) obtained is 0.

Drag Coefficient

The drag coefficient (CD) obtained is 0.

Pressure Contour

Velocity Contour

Re = 100

To obtain Re = 100, the inlet fluid velocity is 7.3037×10-4 m/s. The calculation was done for 1000 iterations.

Residuals

Vertex Averaged Velocity Magnitude

Vertex Averaged Pressure

Lift Coefficient

The lift coefficient (CL) obtained is 0.

Drag Coefficient

The drag coefficient (CD) obtained is 0.

Pressure Contour

Velocity Contour

Re = 1000

To obtain Re = 1000, the inlet fluid velocity is 7.3037×10-3 m/s. The calculation was done for 1000 iterations.

Residuals

Vertex Averaged Velocity Magnitude

Vertex Averaged Pressure

Lift Coefficient

The lift coefficient (CL) obtained is 0.

Drag Coefficient

The drag coefficient (CD) obtained is 0.000125

Pressure Contour

Velocity Contour

Re = 10000

  • Laminar

To obtain Re = 10000, the inlet fluid velocity is 7.3037×10-2 m/s. The calculation was done for 500 iterations.

Residuals

Vertex Averaged Velocity Magnitude

Vertex Averaged Pressure

Lift Coefficient

The lift coefficient (CL) obtained is 0.001

Drag Coefficient

The drag coefficient (CD) obtained is 0.0120

Pressure Contour

Velocity Contour

  • K-Ω SST

To obtain Re = 10000, the inlet fluid velocity is 7.3037×10-2 m/s. The calculation was done for 1000 iterations.

Residuals

Vertex Averaged Velocity Magnitude

Vertex Averaged Pressure

Lift Coefficient

The lift coefficient (CL) obtained is 0.

Drag Coefficient

The drag coefficient (CD) obtained is 0.0115

Pressure Contour

Velocity Contour

Re = 100000

  • Laminar

To obtain Re = 100000, the inlet fluid velocity is 7.3037×10-1 m/s. The calculation was done for 1000 iterations.

Residuals

Vertex Averaged Velocity Magnitude

Vertex Averaged Pressure

Lift Coefficient

The lift coefficient (CL) obtained is 0.

Drag Coefficient

The drag coefficient (CD) obtained is 1.

Pressure Contour

Velocity Contour

  • K-Ω SST

To obtain Re = 100000, the inlet fluid velocity is 7.3037×10-1 m/s. The calculation was done for 1000 iterations.

Residuals

Vertex Averaged Velocity Magnitude

Vertex Averaged Pressure

Lift Coefficient

The lift coefficient (CL) obtained is 0.

Drag Coefficient

The drag coefficient (CD) obtained is 0.925

Pressure Contour

Velocity Contour

From the above contours and plots, the vortex shedding takes place when Reynold’s Number is 10000 and 100000. It is also seen that the coefficients of lift and drag varies when Reynold’s Number increases.

REYNOLD’S NUMBER

MODEL EQUATION

COEFFICIENT OF LIFT (CL)

COEFFICIENT OF DRAG (CD)

10

LAMINAR

0

0

100

LAMINAR

0

0

1000

LAMINAR

0

0.000125

10000

LAMINAR

0.001

0.0120

K-Ω SST

0.0115

0

100000

LAMINAR

0

1

K-Ω SST

0

0.925

Conclusion

From the plots and contours obtained, its evident that laminar viscous model provides vortex shedding at high Reynold’s Number. As the cylinder wall is symmetric, the lift and drag coefficients obtained were low, resulting in lower Strouhal Number. When the Reynold’s Number is below 1000, vortex shedding was not observed, but was observed when it increases till 100000.

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.