Challenge

Identification of Cracks

1 a.observation

1.concrete crushed and the reinforcement in exposed

2.concrete spalled beyond the reinforcement which may be sign of rupture

3.beam top portion looks safe because of the flange advantage from slab

4.the crackdevelops from bottom to top means rebar yielding occurs in support bottom only

answer

its form of flexural failure due to reversal of stress during earthquake

during stress reversal support top experience compression and bottom experience tension

top compression is managed by slab advantage .bottom tension was not satisfied by the provided reinforecement

since the reinforcement got yielded it can not be repaired

b

observation

cracks along beam-column edge

cracks seem to have developed through the structure as it looks much water

beam looks sepred from the column at joints concrete is not severaly crushed

answers

is a plasstic hinge failure

the damaged occured in the joint zone trist of all

cyclic lateral loading and stress reversal at the joints led to the damage

even the slab participated to its best to handle in the tension slab is severaly cracked has undergone tension

with its flange condition but uanble to control the damage

the joint can be strenthened

c observation

cracks are exactly at the joint of column of beam

cracks in beamdeveloped through its entire width

slab also developed more cracks along beam width direction

answers

its a beam pull out failures due to insufficent developedd length of reinforecement in the joints

during earthquake the horizontal movement of structure makes this condition worse and detached the beam member

from column

providing anchorage length two existing concrete is very difficult so not repairable

2a

observation

concrete damaged at top of a column

concrete damaged all around the column

beams are safe

the location of column looks at edge of the building

no walls are built along the column means probaly at ground floor for parking movement access

answers

its a soft storey failure technicallyplatic hinge formation

due to absence of infill walls at the ground floor

the platic hinge forms at the top of ground storey columns during lateral movement

based on the development of crush of concrete it can eitherr be repairable or non repairable

2b

obesrvation

concrete developed complete breakage diagonally

longitudinal reinforcemnt are intact

shear reinforcement spacing looks wider which means probaly lesser shear rebar provided

answer

its a pure shear failure

inadequate shear reinforcemnt compells concrete takes all the shear stresses

2c

observation

column failed completely

failure at top of column

therre are two connected to the column probably one at mid height of the column

the wooden piles might be a post failuree support after column failed providing temporary prop toavoid collapse of the structure

answer

its a short column failure

leads to the effectan additional slab or a beam connected to a column inmid heights leads to the effect

this leads to failure especially if the connection is unintentional are not accounted in design

the failure given in the picture is not at all repairable

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.