Identification of Cracks
AIM: To identify the types of cracks from the given pictures for awareness of structural failures, distinguishing structural and non-structural cracks, observing the structural issues and understanding Seismic failures.
Ans 1.a.

Observations:
- From the picture 1 it is observed that the concrete of beam is crushed and the reinforcement is exposed
- Concrete is damaged beyond the exposed reinforcement
- There is no damage to top portion of the beam due to flange action from slab and is safe
- The cracks are developed from the bottom towards top of the beam indication reinforcement yield at the bottom of the slab
Answer:
- It is a flexural failure due to the reversal of stress due to earthquake.
- During the stress reversal the beam top support experiences compression and the bottom experiences tension
- The top compression was managed by the slab flange support, while the bottom tension was not satisfied by the provided reinforcement
- Since the reinforcement is yielded, the damage cannot be repaired.
Ans 1.b.

Observations:
- Crack is observed at the beam and column junction
- The crack seems to be developed through the structure as the crack looks wider.
- Beam looks separated from the column
- The concrete is not severely crushed
Answer:
- The beam pull-out failure due to insufficient development length of reinforcement in joints
- During the earthquake, the horizontal movement makes this condition worse and the beam is detached from the column
- Since the anchorage reinforcement cannot be provided between two existing concrete members, the failure cannot be repaired.
Ans 1.c.

Observations:
- Cracks are developed at the column and beam junction
- Crack in the beam is developed in the entire width of the beam
- Slab has also developed several cracks along the beam width direction
Answer:
- It is plastic hinge failure
- The damage has appeared only at the joint zone
- Cyclic lateral loading and the stress reversal at the joints led to the damage
- Slab is also subjected to severe stress under tension with its flange condition and the cracks are developed in the slab which could not prevent damage.
- The damage can be repaired by strengthening the joint
Ans 2.a.

Observations:
- The cracks are observed on the top area of column
- The concrete is damaged all around the column face
- The beam looks safe without any damage
- The location of the column looks at the edge of the building
- No walls are built around the column indication the location is ground floor for parking access.
Answer:
- It is a soft frame failure due to plastic hinge formation
- Due to absence of the infill walls probably at ground floor, the plastic hinge forms at the top of the columns during lateral movement
- Based on the development of the crush of the concrete the failure may be repairable or non-repairable depending on the actual inspection of the severity of damage.
Ans 2.b.

Observations:
- The column concrete developed complete breakage diagonally
- Longitudinal reinforcement looks intact
- Shear reinforcement spacing looks wider indicating less shear rebars may be provided
Answer:
- It is pure shear failure
- Inadequate shear reinforcement causes the concrete to carry additional shear stress leading to the shear failure of concrete.
Ans 2.c.

Observations:
- Column failed completely as seen in the picture
- Failure is at the top of column
- There are two slabs connected to the column probably one at mid height and other at the top of column
- The wooden props are used temporarily to support post failure of the column to avoid further collapse of the structure by supporting temporarily.
Answer:
- It is a short column failure
- An additional slab or a beam connected to a column in mid height leads to the effect.
- This leads to the failure especially if the connection is unintentional and not accounted in the design
- The failure is not repairable
CONCLUSION:
Thus we have studied the given pictures and noted the observations of the failed structures and provided the probable reasons of failures and the mentioned if the failures are repairable.