Stress Concentration on a Plate with hole
OBJECTIVE:
Model and simulate two plates with holes against provided design and simulation parameters and compare the results.
PROBLEM STATEMENTS:
| CASE-1 | CASE-2 | |
| PLATE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS | |
![]() |
| Length | 300mm | 300mm |
| Height | 120mm | 120mm |
| Thickness | 30mm | 30mm |
| Circular hole at the center | 60mm | 60mm |
| Small holes 90mm away from center | NA | 30mm |
| BOUNDARY CONDITIONS | Plate fixed at left face | Plate fixed at left face |
| Load of 500 N on right face | Load of 500 N on right face |
MATERIAL USED:
The material used for this simulation is structural steel.

SIMULATION RESULTS:
1. DEFORMATION:




2. VON-MISES STRESS:




DESIGN SELECTION - ANALYSIS POINT OF VIEW:
| DEFORMATION (mm) | CASE 1 | CASE 2 |
| Maximum Deformation | 0.000275 | 0.000409 |
| DEFORMATION (mm) | Maximum and average deformation values are lesser than compared to case-2: | |
| VON-MISES STRESS (MPa) | CASE 1 | CASE 2 |
| Maximum Stress | 0.605910 | 0.802110 |
| VON-MISES STRESS (MPa) | Maximum and average Von-Mises stress values are lesser than compared to case-2. | |
| DESIGN SELECTION - ANALYSIS POINT OF VIEW | As per the simulation results the Case-1 design should be selected. Since, lower values of stress and deformation implies lower stress concentration and resistance to deformation thus less chances component failure. | |
DESIGN SELECTION - MANUFACTURING POINT OF VIEW:
| PLATE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS | ![]() |
![]() |
| DESIGN SELECTION - MANUFACTURING POINT OF VIEW | Component in Case-1 is easier to manufacture as it will require lesser number of operation to be performed on it as compared to Case-2. Moreover, the Component-1 strength is greater than Component-2 because it will have more material than latter. | |
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
- Run siulation studies using 'Static Structural' block in ANSYS.
- Compare designs using results from simulation.
- COmponent selection for manufacturing.
