Week 1 Stress Concentration on a Plate with hole
Case :1
Design a plate with a hole model similar to what we worked in the class, but with increased thickness.
Determine the maximum deformation and stress developed in the model.
Plate dimensions:
Length=300mm
Height=120mm
Thickness=30mm
Circular Hole at the center:
Diameter=60mm
Case 2:
smaller holes 90mm away from the center:
Diameter=30mm
Boundary Conditions:
Plate fixed at left face.
Load of 500N on the right face.
output:
Compare the deformation and maximum stress developed on a structural steel model for the 2 cases
From an analysis standpoint, which of the design will you select?
From a manufacturing standpoint, which of the design will you select
Explanation :
First open the ansys workbench, then choose the static structural.
step-1 : Material assignment
- Open the engineering material and select the required material
- Structural steel is a default material
.
step-2 : geometry
- Open the spaceclaim from the static structural.
- Creade the 2D geomatry using spaceclaim.
- After finishing geomatry select pull option assign the thickness.
step-3 : Mesh
- Select the mesh in the window
- Elemet size is the 6mm
- Mesh --> Generate mesh
step-4 : Bountry condition
- Static structural --> right click, inset -->
- fixed supportchoose the left side, now the left side is the fixed
- Static structural --> right click, inset -->
- force choose the right side, 500N act on the right side

step-4 : Solution
- Extract deformation, Equivalent stress and Equivalent strain
TOTAL DEFORMATION
case maximum minimum
1 0.000274 0
2 0.000279 0
EQUIVALENT STRAIN
case maximum minimum
1 3.0044e-6 9.559e-8
2 2.8881e-6 2.3103e-8

EQUIVALENT STREES
case maximum minimum
1 0.06008 0.001908
2 0.05776 0.000319

CONCLUSION :
- From a analysis standpoint case 2 is preferable since max stress and strain are less compared to case 1 for the same loading condition. This casused by additional holes that act as a stress relliver in this model. so it can be subjected to more load if required. which gives the possibility of reducing material cost and lighter object.
- From a manufacturing standpoint case 1 is perferable as the making of additional two holes requires additional operations to be performed which requires additional times.