Challenge

Identification of Cracks

1.

  a.

  • It is the form of flexural failure due to reversal of stress during earthquake
  • During stress reversal support top experience compression and bottom experience tension
  • Top compression is managed by slab advantage.Bottom tension was not satisfied by the provided reinforcement
  • Since the reinforcement got yielded it can not be repaired

   b.

  • Its beam pull out failure due to insuffiecnt devleopment length of reinforcemnet in joints
  • During earthquake the horizontal movement of structure makes this condition worse and detached the beam member from column
  • Providing anchorage is very difficult. So not repairable

   c.

  • Its a plastic failure
  • The damage occurred only in the joint zone first of all
  • Cyclic lateral loading and stress reversal at the joints led to the damage
  • Even the slab participated to its best to handlle the tension . But unable to control the damage
  • The joint can be strengthened

2.

   a. 

  • Its a soft storey failure, technically plastic hinge formation
  • Due to absence of infill walls at the ground floor, the plastic hinge forms at the top of ground storey columns during lateral movement
  • Based on the development of crush of concrete, it can either be repairable or no-repairable

   b.

  • Its a pure shear failure
  • Inadequate shear reinforcement compels concrete takes all the shear stresses

   c.

  • Its a short column failure
  • An additional slab or a beam connected to a column in mid-height leads to this efffect
  • This leads to failure especially if the connection is unintentional and not accounted in design
  • The failure given  in the picture is not all repairable
Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.