Conceptual design of a building with columns and shear walls

ANS:1

As the structure is more restrained it will be more shrinking expanding and cracking.

There will be more floor shrinkage and expanding in structure a whereas there will be minimum cracks in structure B and C.

The shear walls in the structure also decide whether the floor vibration is more or less in the structure it will be better placing a column at the corners.so that it will reduce the cracks instead of having a shear walls at te corner in the structure.

The torsion in the structure C is more when compare too structure A and B because in the structure C there will be an eccentricity.

The redundancy in structure A and B is more when compared to structure C because there will be an eccentricity in structure C in the left side where the length of the wall 10 meter which cannot carry load equally in either direction.

For lateral stiffness structure C is more laterally stiff when compared to the structure A and structure B because there will be an eccentricity in structure C in the left side where the length of the wall 10 meters which cannot carry load eqality in either direction.

ANS:2

There is a two way eccentricity in the frame along x direction and y direction also with stiffness the eccentricity in x direction is larger when compared to y direction.

There is only two continuous frame in the structure that is B1 and B2 in the x direction and B9,B10 and B11,B12 in the y direction and all other beams and broken at the midway in the frame.

there will be torsional in the structure. to avoid torsional restrains it is better to make the room dimensions even in both x and y direction and placing the column at the junction of the wall if it is feasible better to provide shear wall at appropriate location.

The fundamantel translation mode of vibration is larger than the fundamental torsional made of vibration.

ANS:3

The above plan that is given is totally unsuitable for normal areas is totally unsuitable for normal areas and also in earthquake prone area.

In seismic region the lateral and vertical loads play important criteria because it helps in resisting the failur against the earthquake as the loads.resultant will not consider with the center of the mass of the structure it become eccentic and not suitable for any type of areas.

In this plan a flat slab is more appropriate than a regular beam column junction as it provide support to the column without any provision of the beam which reduce the weight of the building and also helps in the ductility which indirectly helps to maintain the structure in the earthquake prone areas.

Apart from flat slab a wooden structure is also appropriate which reduces the weight of the building and also helps to maintain the structure in the earthquake prone areas.