Challenge

Week 8 - Universal Joint

Aim : To perform a transient structural analysis on a double universal joint with a spring using three different materials.

Objective :

To perform a transient structural analysis on a double universal joint with a spring using three different materials: Structural Steel, Stainless Steel and Titanium alloy. The three materials must be used on the joint with the springs alone. Use a refined mesh if possible for the academic license. You need to obtain the Equivalent stress and total deformation for all the three cases and compare them.

Procedure :

  • Open the Ansys Workbench.
  • Insert the Transient Strucural window.
  • Import the geometry.

  • Open the Ansys Mechanical Module.

Model Setup :

  • Go to geometry rename components as follows;

  • Assign material to spring i.e Shaft 1 as structural steel
  • Change material for case 2 and case 3.

Contacts :

  • Delete all default contacts.

Joints :

  • Insert fixed joint body-ground for spring.

  • Revolute joint for shaft 1 and shaft 2

  • Create body to body revolute joint for Pivot joints.

Meshing :

  • Generate mesh of element size of 2 mm.

Analysis settings :

Joint load :

  • Insert joint load rotation to revolute joint of Shaft 2.

Solution :

Create output results for :

  • Total deformation for model.
  • Equivalent stress for Model.
  • Equivalent strain for Model.

Results :

Case 1 : Spring material as Structural Steel.

Total deformation :

Equivalent stress :

Equivalent strain :

Case 2 : Spring material as Stainless Steel.

Total deformation :

Equivalent stress :

Equivalent strain :

Case 3 : Spring material as Titanium Alloy.

Total deformation :

Equivalent stress :

Equivalent strain :

Comparison of Results :

Sr. No. Results Case 1 Case 2 Case 3
1 Total deformation (mm) 38.637 38.637 38.637
2 Maximum Equivalent stress (MPa) 1410.3 1366 692.8
3 Minimum Equivalent stress (MPa) 4.6679 E-09 4.7141 E-09 4.8282 E-09
4 Maximum Equivalent strain 0.007052 0.007079 0.007218
5 Minimum Equivalent strain 2.3339 E-14 2.3570 E-14 2.4141 E-14

Conclusion:

  • From results there is significant drop of stress in the Case 3 (Titamium alloy).
  • For the all 3 cases the total deformation value stays uniform.
  • Case 1 (Structural Steel) has maximum stress and strain values.
Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.