Week 4
OBJECTIVE-
For the given component, check for the geometrical errors and mesh with the given element Quality criteria. After meshing the component the thickness has to be assigned.
|
S.No |
Quality Criteria |
Value |
|
1 |
Target/Average length |
1 |
|
2 |
Minimum Length |
0.5 |
|
3 |
Maximum Length |
3 |
|
4 |
Aspect |
3 |
|
5 |
Warpage |
15 |
|
6 |
Skewness |
45 |
|
7 |
Jacobian |
0.7 |
|
8 |
Minimum Quad Angle |
45 |
|
9 |
Maximum Quad Angle |
135 |
|
10 |
Minimum Tria Angle |
30 |
|
11 |
Maximum Tria Angle |
120 |
|
10 |
Tria Percentage |
15 |
PROCEDURE-
STEP-1 EXTRACTION OF THE MODEL

FIG-1: MODEL EXTRACTED
STEP-2 EXTRACT MID SURFACE
EXTRACTION OF MID SURFACE HAS TWO SECTION , BECAUSE THIS IS A PLASTIC MODEL IT HAS VARIYING THICK FIRSTLY SEGREGATION OF PARTS WITH DIFFERENT THICKNESS TO HAVE MIDSURFACE BY SURFACE OFFSET AND AT PLACES WHERE THERE IS THREADING AND RIBS , MIDDLE CURVE EXTRATION AND NEW SURFACE FORMATION TECHNIQUE HAVE BEEN USED . SOME IMAGES ARE ATTACHED FOR REFFERENCE. EACH PART WITH VARIYING THICHNESS HAVE DIFFERENT PROPERTY TAB AND THICKNESS ASSIGNED FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF MESH GENERATION .

FIG-2 MIDSURFACE OF MODEL

FIG-3 MID SURFACE OF INNER CENTRE PART WITH INTERNAL THREAD

FIG-4 VARYING PROPERTIES ASSIGNED PARTS WITH VARYING THICKNESS

FIG-4 MID SURFACE UPPER PART ONLY

FIG-5 MID PLANE FROM BOTTOM VIW OF COMPONENTS SHOWING RIBS.
STEP-3 DO COMPLETE GENERATE MESH AND QUALITY CHECK AS PER REQUIRED SPECIFICATION ABOVE MENTIONED IN THE OBJECTIVE.

FIG-6 FINAL RESULT
CONCLUSION- THE OVERALL COMPONENT HAD MANY COMPLICATED PLACES AS ALL QUALITY CRITERIA ARE SATISFIED MANY NEW METHODS OF GENERATING MID PLANE AND MESH AT COMPLEX SPACES ARE LEARNING.