Challenge

Week - 2 - Explicit and Implicit Analysis

Aim:

To study difference in Implicit and Explicit Analysis by solving a problem.

Introduction:

Explicit Analysis:

  • Calculate the state of given system at different time from current time.
  • Generally, used when event occurs faster. {sum of all forces = mass X acceleration}

Implicit Analysis:

  • Find a solution by solving an equation that include both the current and later states of the given system.
  • Used when the events occur much slower. {sum of all forces = 0}

Solution:

Consider, the case of a simple bar in tension. suppose that the force in the bar is non-linear of displacement.

f(u)= u3 + 9u2 + 4u ________________(1)

from (1) it follows that stiffness of the matrix is;

k(u)= 2u2 + 18u + 4 ________________(2)

Explicit Analysis:

Using Incremental Explicit load control method to solve this equation. For this example, three equal load increment (or step) of ΔF=1 unit each are used to load the tension bar. The variable used are u for displacement, f for internal force in the bar, F for external force applied to the bar and k for stiffness.

Incremental displacement or Incremental externally applied forces are represented as Δu & ΔF respectively. Use is made of relationship ΔF=k Δu. The analysis proceed as follows;

Step 1:

u0 = 0 ; ΔF = 1 ; k(u0) =4 ; Δu1 = ΔF / k(u0) = 1/4 = 0.25

u1 = u0 + Δu1 = 0.25

Step 2:

u1 = 0.25 ; ΔF = 1 ; k(u1) =8.625 ; Δu2 = ΔF / k(u1) = 1/8.625 = 0.1159

u2 = u1 + Δu2 = 0.365

Step 3:

u2 = 0.365 ; ΔF = 1 ; k(u2) =10.84 ; Δu3 = ΔF / k(u2) = 1/10.84 = 0.092

u3 = u2 + Δu3 = 0.457

finally, from three steps the following results are obtained;

Fext = ΔF + ΔF + ΔF = 3

fint = u3 + 9u2 + 4u = (0.457)3 + 9 (0.457)2 + 4 (0.457) = 3.79

It is evident from the results that External and Internal forces are not in equilibrium because Fext ≠ fint

Step i

ΔFi

Δui

(Fext)i

(fint)i

fint - Fext = R

1

1

0.25

1

1.578

0.578

2

1

0.1159

2

2.70

0.70

3

1

0.092

3

3.79

0.79

Implicit Analysis:

An implicit analysis is the same as the explicit analysis, expect that at the end of each step Newton-Raphson Iteration are used to enforce equilibrium before moving to the next step. Basically, an incremental force is applied to advance the solution forward at the beginning of a step. However, internal forces and external forces will not be in equilibrium unless the stiffness is linear for the given step. Hence, in order to achieve equilibrium, corrections must be made to the displacement. This is accomplished by using Newton-Raphson iterations to minimize the residuals.

R(u) = fint - Fext

Rj+1 = Rj (uj) + d R(uj) δ uj+1 + _ _ _ _

d (u)

= Rj + k (uj) δ uj+1 + _ _ _ _ (3)

By, neglecting higher order terms in the series, setting Rj+1 = 0 & solving for δ uj+1 the following correction factor is obtained.

δ uj+1 = - [k (uj)]-1 Rj

here, the iteration variable is j and it may take several iterations for the norm of the residual, || R || to be reduce below the chosen tolerance criteria of 0.01.

Step 1:

u0 = 0 ; ΔF = 1 ; k(u0) =4 ; Δu1 = ΔF / k(u0) = 1/4 = 0.25

u1 = u0 + Δu1 = 0.25

Fext = 1

fint = u3 + 9u2 + 4u = (0.25)3 + 9 (0.25)2 + 4 (0.25) = 1.5781

R0 = fint - Fext = 1.5781 – 1 = 0.5781

|| R0 || > 10-2

Newton-Raphson Method are necessary;

Calculate the correction u1 = u10

δ u1 = - [k (u10)]-1 R0

k (u10) = 8.625 ; R0 = 0.5781

δ u1 = - [ 8.625 ]-1 x 0.5781

δ u1 = - 0.0665467

Now, updating the value,

u11 = u10 + δ u1 = 0.25 + (-0.06654) = 0.1835

Now checking residuals,

Fext = 1

fint = u3 + 9u2 + 4u = (0.1835)3 + 9 (0.1835)2 + 4 (0.1835) = 1.0373

now,

R1 = fint - Fext = 1.0373 – 1 = 0.0373

|| R1 || > 10-2

Now, calculating new total correction to u1 = u11

δ u2 = δ u1 - [k (u11)]-1 R1

k (u11) = 7.4032 ; R1 = 0.0373

δ u2 =(-0.0665) - [ 7.4032 ]-1 x 0.0373

δ u2 = - 0.0715

u12 = u10 + δ u2 = 0.25 + (-0.0715) = 0.178

Now checking residuals,

Fext = 1

fint = u3 + 9u2 + 4u = (0.178)3 + 9 (0.178)2 + 4 (0.178) = 1.0028

now,

R2 = fint - Fext = 1.0028 – 1 = 0.0028

|| R2 || < 10-2

So, Newton-Raphson Iteration not necessary.

So, final value is u1 = u12 = 0.178

Step 2 and Step 3:

Similarly, as step 1, we get u2 = 0.2966 & u3 = 0.3911

Step i

ΔFi

Δui

(Fext)i

(fint)i

R = fint - Fext

1

1

0.1784

1

1.0057

0.0057

2

1

0.2966

2

2.0035

0.0035

3

1

0.3911

3

3.0009

0.0009

It is evident from the table that External forces and Internal Forces are coming into equilibrium.

Calculation of Exact Value:

f(u)= u3 + 9u2 + 4u

If f(u)= u3 + 9u2 + 4u =1

u1 = 0.177

If f(u)= u3 + 9u2 + 4u =2

u1 = 0.296

If f(u)= u3 + 9u2 + 4u =3

u1 = 0.3910

Graph:

Conclusion:

  • based on above calculation and graph, we can say that implicit analysis using Newton-Raphson method is closed to the exact solution and Explicit analysis is apart from Exact solution.
  • Implicit analysis is more accurate than Explicit analysis but it is time consuming.
Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.