Project 1
AIM: Mid surface extraction of the car dashboard and meshing under given criteria.
Methodology
we can divide project into three parts.
Geometry Cleanup
Mid surface extraction
Meshing under given quality criteria
Geometry cleanup
Mid surface extraction
The mid surface of given model depends on thickness.The main body thickness is 0.6mm and other structure are of varying thickness.
Use offset method to pull out mid from the model as thickness is not varying for particular part.
mid surface of the model as given below:
Meshing
The quality criteria for the meshing is given below:
| s.no | quality criteria | value |
| 1. | Target length | 4 |
| 2. | Min. length | 2 |
| 3. | Max. length | 6 |
| 4. | Aspect | 3 |
| 5. | Warpage | 15 |
| 6. | Skewness | 45 |
| 7. | Jacobian | 0.7 |
| 8. | Min. quad angle | 45 |
| 9. | Max. quad angle | 135 |
| 10. | Min tria angle | 30 |
| 11. | Max. tria angle | 120 |
| 12. | Tria percentage | 15 |
Use mixed mesh for the model and assign a relevant PID as per thickness
Use swap,split,paste,reconstruction and smooth command to solve off elements.
Learning Outcomes
1. Able to fix Hepmetrical errors and geometric cleanup of the component.
2. Able to creating and extracting of mid surface from the parent geometry of plastic component
3. Defeaturing of the components
4.Meshing of the component considering all the given quality criteria
5.Removing trias and rotating quad
Conclusion:
In the above project model we can conclude that the meshing process is very similar to the any complex geometry and it is observed that before meshing we need to observe and study the model carefully as it has varying thickness and need to assign new property to each of them with respect to their thickness.Now the mesh is generated for the IP substrate(dashboard) and all the elements meet the given quality criteria. Thus the model can be given for next solver process.