Challenge

Identification of Cracks

  • IDENTIFIAION OF CRACKS
  • What is the mode of failure or damage of the beams in the figure above? Are the damages repairable? Elaborate ?
  • QUESTION : 1 (A)
  • ANSWER :
  • Mode of failure is given below :
  • It is the form of flexural failure and it is developed at the bottom of the beam shown in above picture .
  • this failure is occuer due to reversal of stress during earthquake .
  • we see that above picture the only beam failure at bottom and column is not disturbed .
  • During the stress reversal support top experiences copmpession and bottom experriences tension .
  • The top compression is managed by slab advantages as shown above picture and bottom compression is not satisfied by provided reinforcement
  • the reinforcement is yielded
  • This is non repairable
  • QUESTION : 1 (B)
  • ANSWER :
  • In above picture we see that the crackes are developed at beam column edges
  • we see that the beam is not connected to the column .
  • It is the beam pull out failure and such failure is occur due to insufficient developement length of reinforcement in joints.
  • the beam is not attached to the column .
  • during the earthquake the horizontal movement of structure makes this condition worse and detached the beam member from column .
  • if we think about repair so that we have to provide the anchorage length between two existion concrete member and it is very difficults , so that it is not repairable .
  • QUESTION : 1 (C)
  • ANSWER :
  • In above picture we see that the crackes are developed at the joints of column beam
  • the crakes in beam are developed through its entire width .
  • also slab is developed the more crackes
  • This is the plastic hinged type of failure
  • the major damage is occer only in joints zone
  • the joints can be repairable
  • QUESTION : 2
  • What is the mode of failure or damage of the beams in the figure above? Are the damages repairable? Elaborate ?
  • QUESTION : 2 (A)
  • ANSWER :
  • In above picture we see that concrete damage around the column faces
  • the above beam is safe .
  • in the picture the this is the column is at ground floor or basement of the building no walls are provided around the wall
  • this failure is occer due to soft story failure or due to plastic hinged formation .
  • during lateral movement the absence of infill walls the plastic hinged is formed at the top of the column .
  • it can be either repariable or non repairable .
  • QUESTION : 2 (B)
  • ANSWER :
  • In above picture the concrete developed complete brakages diagonally
  • the spacing of shear reinforcement is too wider and less amount of shear rebar is provided .
  • it is the pure shear failure
  • inadiquate shear reinforcement compels concrete takes all the shere stresses
  • it is non repariable
  • QUESTION : 2 (C)
  • ANSWER :
  • In above picture we see that column is completely failled
  • there are two slabes are connected to the one column .
  • It is short column failure
  • the failure is occur due to slab are provided at mid height it is not accoding to codel provision .
  • this type of failure is not repairable .
Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.