Challenge

Assignment 4

Comparative Study of all 6 Iteration Run

FAILURE_JOHNSON

Type

Energy Error

Mass Error

Simulation Time

(seconds)

Material

Used

Failure Criteria

Eps_max

Vonmises Stress

(N/mm2)

Crack or Deleted

Law2

_epsmax_failure

0.8%

0.00

99 s

MAT 2 (PLAS_JOHN)

FAILURE_

JOHNSON

0.151

2.752e+02

Deleted

Elements

Law2

_epsmax_crack

4.1%

0.00

109.24 s

MAT 2 (PLAS_JOHN)

FAILURE_

JOHNSON

0.151

3.182e+02

Cracked

Elements

Law2

_epsmax_nofail

0.8%

0.00

154.76 s

MAT 2 (PLAS_JOHN)

NO

0.151

2.202e+02

Cracked Elements

Law2

1.1%

0.00

163.68 s

MAT 2 (PLAS_JOHN)

FAILURE_

JOHNSON

0.00

2.451e+02

Deleted Elements

Law1

1.3%

0.00

162.80 s

MAT 1

(ELASTIC)

FAILURE_

JOHNSON

0.151

1.089e+04

No deformation

Law36

1.5%

0.00

172.01 s

MAT 36

(PLAS_TAB)

FAILURE_

JOHNSON

0.5

1.075e+03

Deleted

Elements

Reason

  • As observed from the animation for all the 6 Iteration runs it can be seen that in the First 3 Runs, elements can be seen cracking away and then being deleted from the animation.
  • It means to tell that Law 2 (PLAS_JOHNS) materials are more realistic.
  • Keeping Dadv=Ixfem=1 shows cracking more significantly.
  • Material in LAW 1 and LAW 36 are exceeding UTS of 425 MPa which is unrealistic.
  • Result Files of all the 6 Iteration run will be attached.

 


 


 

 

 

 

 

LAW 27

 

Type

Energy Error

Mass Error

Simulation Time

(seconds)

Material

Used

Failure Criteria

Vonmises Stress

(N/mm2)

LAW 27

-7.1%

0.00

144.85 s

PLAS_BRITTLE

FAILURE_

JOHNSON

3.428e+02

 

Elements are seen cracking away.

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.