Week 8 - BlockMesh Drill down challenge
The main aim of this project is to simulate the flow through the backwards-facing step by using the blocks in icoFoam solver and post-process the results like velocity profile at the step of 0.085m from the start point of the blocks.
The blocks are built by one by one by using the nodes of all three axis There are 5 blocks are used for this project. The number of cells in the x-Direction is 200 and in the y-direction 10 and in the Z-direction it should be the 1.we have to edit the blockmeshdict file in order to run the simulation.
The block diagram looks like this in 2D and Isometric view
The below-shown code for the simple grading .we edit this code in the blockMeshdict file located in the system folder.
case 1:For grading factor =1:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
========= |
\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\ / A nd | Version: 8
\\/ M anipulation |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
object blockMeshDict;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
convertToMeters 0.01;
vertices
(
(0 0 0)//point 0
(8 0 0)//point 1
(8 0.5 0)//point 2
(0 0.5 0)//point 3
(8 1 0)//point 4
(0 1 0)//point 5
(20 1 0)//point 6
(20 0.5 0)//point 7
(20 0 0)//point 8
(20 -1 0)//point 9
(8 -1 0)//point 10
(0 0 0.1)//point 11
(8 0 0.1)//point 12
(8 0.5 0.1)//point 13
(0 0.5 0.1)//point 14
(8 1 0.1)//point 15
(0 1 0.1)//point 16
(20 1 0.1)//point 17
(20 0.5 0.1)//point 18
(20 0 0.1)//point 19
(20 -1 0.1)//point 20
(8 -1 0.1)//point 21
);
blocks
(
hex (0 1 2 3 11 12 13 14) (80 10 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (3 2 4 5 14 13 15 16) (80 10 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (2 7 6 4 13 18 17 15) (120 10 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (1 8 7 2 12 19 18 13) (120 10 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
hex (10 9 8 1 21 20 19 12) (120 20 1) simpleGrading (1 1 1)
);
edges
(
);
boundary
(
Inlet
{
type patch;
faces
(
(0 11 14 3)
(3 14 16 5)
);
}
outlet
{
type patch;
faces
(
(9 8 19 20)
(8 7 18 19)
(7 6 17 18)
);
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
faces
(
(0 3 2 1)
(3 5 4 2)
(10 1 8 9)
(1 2 7 8)
(2 4 6 7)
(11 12 13 14)
(14 13 15 16)
(21 20 19 12)
(12 19 18 13)
(13 18 17 15)
);
}
Noslipwalls
{
type wall;
faces
(
(5 16 15 4)
(4 15 17 6)
(0 1 12 11)
(10 21 12 1)
(10 9 20 21)
);
}
);
mergePatchPairs
(
);
// ************************************************************************* //pressure boundary conditions:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
========= |
\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\ / A nd | Version: 8
\\/ M anipulation |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volScalarField;
object p;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform 0;
boundaryField
{
Inlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}
outlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 0;
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
Noslipwalls
{
type zeroGradient;
}
}
// ************************************************************************* //Velocity Boundary conditions:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
========= |
\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\ / A nd | Version: 8
\\/ M anipulation |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volVectorField;
object U;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform (0 0 0);
boundaryField
{
Inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0.1 0 0);
}
outlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
Noslipwalls
{
type noSlip;
}
}
// ************************************************************************* //Transport properties:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
========= |
\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\ / A nd | Version: 8
\\/ M anipulation |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
location "constant";
object transportProperties;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
nu [0 2 -1 0 0 0 0] 4e-6;
// ************************************************************************* //ControlDict:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
========= |
\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\ / A nd | Version: 8
\\/ M anipulation |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
location "system";
object controlDict;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
application icoFoam;
startFrom startTime;
startTime 0;
stopAt endTime;
endTime 6;
deltaT 0.002;
writeControl timeStep;
writeInterval 20;
purgeWrite 0;
writeFormat ascii;
writePrecision 6;
writeCompression off;
timeFormat general;
timePrecision 6;
runTimeModifiable true;
// ************************************************************************* //Mesh block diagram:
Velocity variation profile:
Pressure variation profile:
the velocity profile at 0.085 m from the inlet of the geometry for grading factor=1;
case 2:For grading factor 0.2
(
hex (0 1 2 3 11 12 13 14) (80 10 1) simpleGrading (0.2 5 1)
hex (3 2 4 5 14 13 15 16) (80 10 1) simpleGrading (0.2 5 1)
hex (2 7 6 4 13 18 17 15) (120 10 1) simpleGrading (0.2 5 1)
hex (1 8 7 2 12 19 18 13) (120 10 1) simpleGrading (0.2 5 1)
hex (10 9 8 1 21 20 19 12) (120 20 1) simpleGrading (0.2 5 1)
);Mesh block diagram:
Velocity variation profile:
Pressure variation profile:
the velocity profile at 0.085 m from the inlet of the geometry for grading factor=1;
Conclusion:
By changing the simple grading factor from the value of 0.2 to 1 the mesh becomes finer and the solution becomes very accurate.
Overall the change in the size of simple grading factor (mesh size) the results remains the same as approximately.
The execution time is lower for lower meshing grading factor.