Week 7 Minor Project
Objective
Obtain the result of a fill+pack+warp analysis on the model and from the result identify the main contributing factor for the warpage on the model.
procedure
following is the process to obtain the results:
- Create model with having specification given below:
- Base diameter = 100 mm
- Top diameter = 160 mm
- Height = 50 mm
- Thickness = 5 mm
- Choose to dual domain mesh with having global edge length of 2.5mm
- Gating system
- There are three gating system:Gate
- Runner
- Sprue
- Gate specifications:
|
Number of beams |
20 |
||||||||
|
Cross section |
Rectangle |
||||||||
|
shape |
Tapered by end dimension |
||||||||
|
Cross sectional dimensions |
|
- Runner specifications:
|
Number of beams |
50 |
|
Cross section |
circular |
|
shape |
Non tapered |
|
Cross sectional diameter |
10mm |
- Sprue specifications:
|
Number of beams |
45 |
||||
|
Cross section |
Circular |
||||
|
Shape |
Tapered by end diameter |
||||
|
Cross sectional dimensions |
|
Gating system shown below:
- Set analysis sequence to ‘fill+pack+warp’
- Select material as ‘Lexan 940: SABIC Innovative Plastic US, LLC’.
Details of selected materials are:
|
Details |
Sub details |
|
Manufacturer |
SABIC Innovative Plastic US, LLC |
|
Trade name |
Lexan 940 |
|
Family name |
POLYCARBONATE (PC) |
|
Material structure |
Amorphous |
- Perform process setting wizard:
Details of process setting wizard are:
|
Details |
Sub details |
||||||||||
|
Mold surface temperature |
82°C |
||||||||||
|
Melt temperature |
301°C |
||||||||||
|
Filling control |
Injection tome of 1.2s |
||||||||||
|
Velocity/pressure switch over |
By %filled at 95% |
||||||||||
|
Pack/holding control |
Packing pressure vs time:
|
||||||||||
|
Cooling time |
Automatic |
||||||||||
|
Number of laminae |
14 |
- Start analysis and after completion of analysis, there are two analysis found i.e. flow and warp.
Flow result:
|
Fill time |
1.302 sec Animation =https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxEDLfcR9aU |
|
Pressure at v/p switch over |
41.49 mpa |
|
Temperature at flow front |
302.8°c |
|
Bulk temperature |
40.98 sec |
|
Shear rate, bulk time |
1.303 sec |
|
Volumetric shrinkage at ejection |
8.176 % |
|
Time to reach ejection temperature |
74.98 sec |
|
Frozen layer fraction time |
40.98 sec |
|
Average velocity time |
40.98 sec |
|
Bulk temperature at end of fill |
311.0°c |
|
Flow rate, beam time |
40.98 sec |
|
Frozen layer fraction at end of fill |
0.0779 |
|
Pressure time |
40.98 sec |
|
Pressure at end of fill |
35.19 mpa |
|
Shear stress at wall |
40.98 sec |
|
Sink mark, index |
5.754 % |
|
Volumetric shrinkage time |
40.98 sec |
|
Flow front speed |
421 cm/sec |
|
Cavity weight time |
40.98 sec |
|
Maximum injection pressure (at 1.22 sec) |
41.4857 mpa |
Warpage result:
|
Deflection |
(Min – max) range in mm |
|
All effect |
0.3319 – 1.023 |
|
Differential cooling |
0.0000 – 9.E-07 |
|
Differential shrinkage |
0.3319 – 1.023 |
|
Orientation effect |
0.0000 – 5.E-09 |
- Causes of warpage
There are three different causes for the warpage are:
- Differential shrinkage
- Differential cooling
- Orientation effects
- outputs after my own observation are:
- The model should be of uniform thickness.
- Temperature should be maintained uniform throughout the thickness.
- Selection of isolate warpage tends to give a greater number of warpage results like differential shrinkage, differential cooling and orientation effects and also along the x, y and z directions.
- Selection of dual domain mesh tends to give quick result and lesser accuracy as compare to 3D mesh.
Learning outcomes:
Following are the things that I have learned in this challenge are:
- Warpage is defined as the change of shape from its original shape due to factors like differential cooling, differential shrinkage and orientation effects.
- The shape of model should be like that should create minimum warpage. i.e. wall thickness should be uniform
- Gating system should be properly designed in order to avoid warpage.
- Proper material selection in order to avoid warpage. Material should be selected according to application of the product.
- Interpretation of flow and warpage results.
Conclusion:
The challenge was an amazing for me as there was lot of things to learn like warpage, fill+pack+warp analysis, design of proper gating system, selection of proper material that suits the product according to its application and also learned various interpretation of results. The credit goes to skill lync for helping me in completing this challenge. And also providing me the amazing platform to enhance the skill.
Thanks