Challenge

Week 7-Long Piston With Cam

Long Piston with Cam Assignment

Objective

Transient Structural Analysis is performed on a Long Piston and Cam model for different contact conditions. The objective here is to understand the difference in the behaviour of the Piston and Cam for different contact conditions.

Design Model and Meshing

There are 3 main bodies in the model – barrel, cam and follower. The barrel and cam are modelled as rigid bodies.

Fixed joint is defined for barrel

Revolute Joint for Cam

Translational Joint between barrel and follower

Models is meshed finer to element size of 3mm on the contact faces.

Analysis

The transient analysis is performed using the 9 step incremental joint rotation on the cam

The different cases are for different contact conditions keeping the geometric properties and the rotation as same.

The results are as shown below and tabulated after the snapshots

  • Equivalent Stress

Case 1 – Frictionless Contact

Case 2 – Frictional Contact – 0.1 as friction coefficient

Case 3 – Frictional Contact – 0.2 as friction coefficient

  • Directional Deformation

Case 1 – Frictionless Contact

Case 2 – Frictional Contact – 0.1 as friction coefficient

Case 3 – Frictional Contact – 0.2 as friction coefficient

  • Equivalent Elastic Strain

Case 1 – Frictionless Contact

Case 2 – Frictional Contact – 0.1 as friction coefficient

Case 3 – Frictional Contact – 0.2 as friction coefficient

Results and Conclusion

Simulation Cases

Max. Equivalent Stress (MPa)

Max. Equivalent Strain

Max. X Direction Deformation (mm)

Frictionless Contact

265.02

0.00133

20.317

Frictional Contact -

0.1 Frictional Coefficient

397.6

0.002

20.322

Frictional Contact -

0.2 Frictional Coefficient

595.99

0.003

20.328

  • The frictionless contact between the cam and the piston follower produces the lowest stress in the piston, as the frictional contact coefficient becomes higher the stress in the piston follower increases.
  • The frictionless contact between the cam and the piston follower produces the lowest strain in the piston follower, as the frictional contact coefficient becomes higher the strain in the piston follower increases.
  • The above implies it is always advisable to have lubricated contact surface between piston follower and cam to generate frictionless contact and keep the stresses within the allowable limits.
  • The deformation of the piston is fairly consistent for all the 3 contact simulation cases as the cam is rotated through 360 degrees.
Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.