Structural Analysis of the Railwheel and Track with different load setup using ANSYS
Objective: Structural Analysis of the Railwheel and Track Setup with the different case mentioned below:
Case 1: Multiply the bearing load by 5 times and compare the results with the load of 100000 N Compare the Total Deformation, Equivalent stress and the life under both the loads
Case 2: Implement a User-defined result and calculate the Total Deformation from this result and check if it is the same as that obtained by the inbuilt result by ANSYS for a load of 100000 N.
Model Given to perform the simulation:
Model Setup:
The material used- Structural steel
Contacts created:
Rail Track fixed to ground:
Frictional contact b/w wheel and track
Frictionless contact b/w bearing and wheel
Planar contact for wheel because it has motion in one plane as translational and rotational both.
Translational movement:
Meshing of 50mm and in the surface of contact b/w wheel and track face sizing of 35mm
Case 1: Bearing Load of 100000N Case 2: Bearing Load of 500000N
Analysis Settings
Case1: Total Deformation: Case2: Total Deformation:
Case1: Equivalent Stress Case2: Equivalent Stress
At 1e5 load At 5e5 load
At 1e5 load At 5e5 load
Case1 Life: Case2 Life:
At 1e5 load At 5e5 load
Results for 1e5 & 5e5 Load:
| Load (N) | Total Deformation (mm) | Equivalent Stress (MPa) | Fatigue Life (Cycle) |
| 1e5 | 998.9 | 166.83 | 5.4e5 |
| 5e5 | 999 | 659.6 | 3034 |
After increasing the load by 5X there is significant amount of increase in stress and a decrease in fatigue life. So have to take care of the material and manufacturing processes of a wheel.
The low-medium carbon Si-Mn-Mo-V steel was designed to make railway wheels by forging and rolling.
Case 3: User-defined expression for total deformation
After giving input of user-defined expression for total we can see that there is no difference in automated and user-defined results so one can conclude that the results we get in both the cases are accurate.