Modelling and simulation of flow through a flowbench
Aim :- To create a 3D model of a flow bench and run flow analysis & to obtain the plot for lift vs mass flow rate.
Objective :-
- create a 3D model of a flow bench and run flow analysis.
- To obtain the plot for lift vs mass flow rate.
- Run the grid dependence test, For three grids run the simulation at a particular valve lift and explain the results
Theory :-
- An air flow bench is a device used for testing the internal aerodynamic qualities of an engine component and is related to the more familiar wind tunnel.
- It is used primarily for testing the intake and exhaust ports of cylinder heads of internal combustion engines. It is also used to test the flow capabilities of any component such as air filters, carburetors, manifolds or any other part that is required to flow gas.
3D model of a flow bench :-
- Dia of cylinder = 0.1m
- Extrude Length of cylinder = 0.1m
- Shell thickness = 0.002m
- Inlet port dia = 0.03m
- Value dimensions are as shown in fig 2
Flow Analysis :-
Case -1 ( Automatic Mesh Level 3 ) :-
- For the mesh level of 3 the internal flow was calculated for the five different position of valve lift
- The five different position are as follows :- 0.001 , 0.003 , 0.005 , 0.007 , 0.009 m
- The Cut-plot and the flow trajectories for the five different valve lift is shown below
Case -2 ( Automatic Mesh Level 4 ) :-
- For the mesh level of 4 the internal flow was calculated for the five different position of valve lift
- The five different position are as follows :- 0.002 , 0.004 , 0.006 , 0.008 , 0.010 m
- The Cut-plot and the flow trajectories for the five different valve lift is shown below
Case -3 ( Automatic Mesh Level 5 ) :-
- For the mesh level of 5 the internal flow was calculated for the 10 different position of valve lift
- The ten different position are as follows :- 0.001 , 0.002 , 0.003 , 0.004 , 0.005 , 0.006 , 0.007 , 0.008 , 0.009 , 0.010 m
- The Mesh value of 5 was selected as the best mesh as the flow looks more smooth .
- The Cut-plot and the flow trajectories for the ten different valve lift is shown below
Cut-Plot Observation :-
- The change in the valve lift changes the mass flowing rate inside the cylinder
- The flow seems to a very low when the valve is open to a 0.001m and a massive flow is seen when the valve is open upto 0.01m
- The flow seems to be varying as the valve changes its lift
- Also when the mesh is refined to greater level the flow looks more realistic and smooth
- Thus the level 5 mesh values shows the smooth flow for each 0.001 change in valve lift
Explanation :-
- Software used solid works 2016
- Starting by modelling the 3D model for the flow bench
- Using the proper dimensions and the extrude function to create a fully defined model
- Now to start with the flow analysis
- Providing the boundary conditions as total pressure at inlet as 400000 and static pressure at base lid/outlet as 100000 pa & running the base line simulation
- Now to obtain the mass flow rate at different valve lift position will start with new parametric study and provide the dimensions to vary itself
- For the three different mesh values we need to run the flow analysis for varying valve lift for each case
- After the completion of parametric study we obtain the surface goal for the mass flow rate and the clut-plot for each case
- Lastly obtained the graph or plot for the lift vs mass flow rate in each three mesh condition
Result :-
- Thus we have studied the simulation of flow through a flow bench
- Created the 3d model of the flow bench and ran the parametric study
- Ran the grid dependency test for the three different grid/mesh values for the varying valve lift condition
- Also plotted the graph for the lift vs mass flow rate for each case
Graph / Plot :-
For Case-1 ( mesh level 3 )
- The valve lift were positioned at :- 0.001 , 0.003 , 0.005 , 0.007 , 0.009 m
- The mass flow rate at each valve lift value is given below with the graph for the lift value vs the mass flow rate values for the case of automatic mesh level 3. is shown below
For Case-2 ( mesh level 4 )
- In this case the valve lift were positioned at :- 0.002 , 0.004 , 0.006 , 0.008 , 0.010 m
- The mass flow rate at each valve lift value is given below with the graph for the lift value vs the mass flow rate values for the case of automatic mesh level 4. is shown below
For Case-3 ( mesh level 5 )
- In this case the valve lift were positioned at :- 0.001 , 0.002 , 0.003 , 0.004 , 0.005 , 0.006 , 0.007 , 0.008 , 0.009 , 0.010 m
- The mass flow rate at each valve lift value is given below with the graph for the lift value vs the mass flow rate values for the case of automatic mesh level 5. is shown below
Conclusion :-
- As the value for the valve lift increases the mass flow rate also increases as it depends on the area so as area increases mass flow rate also increase
- The graph shows for the different mesh conditions the values obtained are negative
- As the mass flow leaves the domain the values are considered as negative
- The graph show that the mass flow rate is ranging betn the -0.1 to -0.3 ie in case 1 the graph lies at -0.1 to -0.3 and for case 2 it lies betn -0.15 to -0.3 so it is due to the change in the value lift values for the both case thus the combined graph is seen in the third case as the valve lift ranges from 0.001 to 0.01 m
- It is also observed that as the value of lift increases to 0.008 and reaches max 0.01 the graph curve for that value slowly converts to a straight line
- Thus the effect of valve lift to the mass flow rate is that as the valve opens more the flow increases accordingly