Modelling and simulation of flow through a flowbench
OBJECTIVE:
To create a 3D model of an IC engine flow bench geometry and perform a flow analysis. For a particular valve lift, carry out a grid dependency test and identify the best grid size. Further, using this grid size perform a parametric study to study the effect of valve lift on mass flow rate.
SOLUTION:
A flow bench geometry is a device used to study the internal aerodynamic qualities of an engine component. It is primarily used to test the intake and exhaust ports used in cylinder heads in an IC engine. It is also used to test the capabilities of other automotive components like air filters, carburettors, manifolds and so on.
In this project, the aim is to analyse the flow over a valve used in IC engines. A flow bench geometry of the engine with a single valve is modelled and the analysis is carried out. The analysis includes a grid dependency test and parametric study to better understand the effect of valve lift on the mass flow rate.
Step 1:
A simple IC engine flow geometry is created constituting a cylinder, intake valve with a fuel port. The cylinder dimensions are 100mm in diameter and 100mm in height. The fuel port has dimensions of 25mm in diameter and the valve is designed as shown in the figure. The cylinder and fuel port was given a shell thickness of 2mm. Since the flow analysis is internal, lids were created at the end of fuel port and at the bottom of the cylinder to ensure that the model is airtight.
Step 2:
The flow analysis is set up using the wizard option. A steady state internal flow using air as the working fluid was defined. The boundary conditions included defining the pressure values at the both lids. At the fuel port lid, a total pressure of 200000 Pa was defined and at the bottom lid of the cylinder static pressure of 101325 Pa was defined. Further, while meshing all surfaces along the valve was given a finer mesh, to capture the behaviour better.
Step 3: Grid dependency test
In this test, the valve lift was maintained constant at 5mm and three different grid sizes was used. The corresponding velocity, pressure and mass flow rates were analysed. The grid size was made fine to the maximum capability of the machine. Even though, the best mesh was not achieved due to the limitations in the capability of the machine, the finest possible mesh size of 5 was used for further calculations.
|
Parameter |
Design point 1 |
Design point 2 |
Design point 3 |
|
Mesh size |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Pressure (Pa) |
|||
|
Min |
89203.72 |
83877.44 |
76619.68 |
|
Max |
194933.76 |
196578.26 |
196704.81 |
|
Velocity (m/s) |
|||
|
Min |
5.26 |
8.06 |
4.08 |
|
Max |
214.576 |
211.546 |
304.69 |
|
Mass flow rate (kg/s) |
|||
|
Surface goal |
0.0655 |
0.0651 |
0.0604 |
Step 4: Parametric Study
In the parametric study, the mass flow rate behaviour with varying valve lift values was analysed. The maximum and minimum valve lifts were defined as 8mm and 5mm respectively and the flow behaviour at 6 different values (between 8mm and 5mm) was analysed.
|
Parameter |
Design point 1 |
Design point 2 |
Design point 3 |
Design point 4 |
Design point 5 |
Design point 6 |
|
Valve lift (m) |
0.005 |
0.0056 |
0.0062 |
0.0068 |
0.0074 |
0.008 |
|
Mesh size |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Pressure (Pa) |
|
|
|
|||
|
Min |
76645.66591 |
80426.90951 |
81155.15805 |
86773.88061 |
83848.1609 |
88274.25573 |
|
Max |
196704.1898 |
195216.1279 |
192893.2865 |
191792.969 |
188372.7185 |
186045.4591 |
|
Velocity (m/s) |
|
|
|
|||
|
Min |
4.054893153 |
2.853253613 |
0.954976378 |
3.06444544 |
0.29586214 |
0.573207849 |
|
Max |
304.6447322 |
317.7622228 |
322.807963 |
334.6007592 |
329.9762535 |
349.5916122 |
|
Mass flow rate (kg/s) |
|
|
|
|||
|
Surface goal |
0.060411485 |
0.073595199 |
0.084789942 |
0.095057012 |
0.103377105 |
0.11048618 |
From the results it can be observed that considerable changes in flow patterns takes place with varying valve lifts. When the valve lift changes from 5mm to 8mm,
- The mass flow rate increases continuously, 60.4 g/s to 110.5 g/s.
- The value of maximum velocity increases from 304.6 m/s to 349.6 m/s
- The maximum pressure value decreases from 196.7 kPa to 186.04 kPa.