Conceptual design of a building with columns and shear walls
Question 1:
The building shown, 20 × 35 m in plan, has columns on a 5 × 5 m grid and shear walls (with dimensions shown in m, 250 mm in thickness) in three alternative arrangements, (a), (b), (c), all with the same total cross-sectional area of the shear walls. Compare the three alternatives, taking into account the restraint of floor shrinkage, the lateral stiffness and the torsional one with respect to the vertical axis, the vertical reinforcement required for the same total flexural capacity at the base, the static eccentricity, the system’s redundancy, foundation systems, architectural constraints etc.
As the structure is more restrained it will be more shrinking, expanding and cracking.
There will be more floor shrinkage and expanding in structure A whereas there will be minimum cracks in structure B and C.
The shear walls in the structure also decide whether the floor vibration is more or less in the structure it will be better placing a column at the corners.So that it will reduce the cracks instead of having a shear walls at the corner in the structure.
The Torsion in the structure C is more when compared to structure A and B because in the structure C there will be an eccentricity.
The redundancy in structure A and B is more when compared to structure C because there will be an eccentricity in structure C in the left side where the length of the wall 10 meters which cannot carry load equally in either direction.
For Lateral stiffness structure C is more laterally stiff when compared to the structure A and structure B because there will be an eccentricity in structure C in the left side where the length of the wall 10 meters which cannot carry load equally in either direction.
Question 2:
Discuss the suitability for earthquake resistance of the moment resisting framing plan of a three-storey building depicted here (cross-sectional dimensions in cm), the eccentricity of the centre of mass (as centroid of floor plan) to the centre of stiffness (from the moments of inertia of the columns) are shown. Suggest an alternative. Also, is there torsional flexibility? Are the two fundamental translational modes of vibration larger than the fundamental torsional mode of vibration. Discuss qualitatively.
- In this frame, there is a two-way eccentricity of the center of mass in accordance with the center of stiffness which is the eccentricity of the x-direction is larger than the y-direction.
- And also only 2 numbers of frames continuous from one plain to another i.e. B1 and B2 at x-direction and B9 and B10 at y-direction. All other frames are broken at the midway.
Question 3:
A multi-storey building with basement, with a quadrilateral (non symmetrical floor plan) plan as, has interior columns in an irregular (not in a grid) pattern in plan that serves architectural and functional considerations. Partition walls and interior beams supporting the slab have different layout in different stories. However, there is no constraint to the type, location and size of the lateral force resisting components and sub-systems on the perimeter. Proposals are to be made and justified for the choice of the lateral-load-resisting system and its foundation.
The above plan that is given is totally unsuitable for normal areas and also in Earthquake prone area.
In seismic region the lateral and vertical loads play important criteria because it helps in resisting the failure against the earthquake as the loads. Resultant will not co inside with the center of the mass of the structure it becomes eccentric and not suitable for any type of areas.
In this plan a flat slab is more appropriate than a regular beam column junction as it provides support to the columns without any provision of the beam which reduces the weight of the building and also helps in the ductility which indirectly helps to maintain the structure in the the earthquake prone areas.
Apart from flab slab a wooden structure is also appropriate which reduces the weight of the building and also helps to maintain the structure in the the earthquake prone areas.