Conceptual design of a building with columns and shear walls

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A BUILDING WITH COLUMNS AND SHEAR WALLS

AIM -

TO STUDY THE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A BUILDING WITH COLUMNS AND SHEAR WALLS

OBJECTIVE -

• To investigate the suitability of the given plan concerning seismic behavior.
• To schematically draw a seismic viable structural plan.

Question 1:
The building shown, 20 × 35 m in plan, has columns on a 5 × 5 m grid and shear walls (with dimensions shown in m, 250 mm in thickness) in three alternative arrangements, (a), (b), (c), all with the same total cross-sectional area of the shear walls. Compare the three alternatives, taking into account the restraint of floor shrinkage, the lateral stiffness, and the torsional one concerning the vertical axis, the vertical reinforcement required for the same total flexural capacity at the base, the static eccentricity, the system’s redundancy, foundation systems, architectural constraints, etc.

Question 2:
Discuss the suitability for earthquake resistance of the moment-resisting framing plan of a three-story building depicted here (cross-sectional dimensions in cm), the eccentricity of the center of mass (as the centroid of floor plan) to the center of stiffness (from the moments of inertia of the columns) are shown. Suggest an alternative. Also, is there torsional flexibility? Are the two fundamental translational modes of vibration larger than the fundamental torsional mode of vibration? Discuss qualitatively.

ANSWER -

Indirect Lateral Load Transfer in X and Y Directions - The beams are connecting to another beam which is ineffective during lateral load transfer. In such conditions, the primary beam is prone to shear failure.

ECCENTRICITY -

The longer the distance between the center of mass and the center of stiffness, the higher the torsional moment of the building. As per the given plan eccentricity, the building is subjected to higher torsional moment (Torsional flexibility) in both X and Y directions.

Red indicates torsional influence during x-direction excitation

Blue indicates torsional influence during y-direction excitation

STRONG BEAM WEAK COLUMN POSSIBILITY -

The size of the column majorly mentions as 25cm x 25cm. But all the beams have a much deeper section that is 50cm. The inertia of the beam is visually higher than the column. If the column reinforcement is adequately greater than that of beams, we are okay and since we do not have the reinforcement detail, this is doubtful. It is recommended to have slightly bigger sizes for the columns.

THE ALTERNATE FRAMING PLAN:

Question 3:

A multi-story building with a basement, with a quadrilateral (nonsymmetrical floor plan) plan, has interior columns in an irregular (not in a grid) pattern plan that serves architectural and functional considerations. Partition walls and interior beams supporting the slab have a different layouts in different stories. However, there is no constraint to the type, location, and size of the lateral force-resisting components and sub-systems on the perimeter. Proposals are to be made and justified for the choice of the lateral-load-resisting system and its foundation.

Observations in the given Framing plan:

Floor plan- The floor plan of the building is not either uniform or symmetric. So naturally, any lateral load induced in the floor will not have 100% influence in the same direction. A Special lateral load-resisting system for these torsional moments should be accommodated.

Random Internal columns - Since the internal columns are random, they are unable to transfer lateral loads efficiently and can not achieve desirable building responses. So we have to assume and design those columns for only gravity loads.

Floor-to-floor variations in Partition walls and Beams - Partition walls provide important mass control in a building and beams play a key role in shear transfer from floor to beam. All these elements are not in order. So heavy distortion and distribution of lateral loads will happen.

Suggestion on the Lateral load system & Its foundation:

Heavy torsional forces should be controlled by the respective lateral load systems. So "Corner Shear walls" are suggested.

The proportion of floor area is greater on the left side than on the right side (Irregular quadrilateral). So Corner shear walls on the left side should be heavier than the right.

Corner Shear walls shall preferably be supported over a box foundation. Shear walls should be connected by Link beams to transfer shear from one to the other.

The internal columns shall be supported by isolated footings. Those isolated footings can be connected with Shear walls through Tie beams.