Project

CFD analysis on Cyclone Separator

Cyclone Separator

Cyclone Separator is a means of separating different liquid phases (different liquid densities), or, separating particles from a gas stream. Cyclone separators often form part of a pre-cleaning stage prior to a gas or liquid being discharged. This article focuses on gas cyclone separator.

gas cyclone and hydro cyclone

Gas cyclones are used to remove entrained particles from a gas stream.

Hydrocyclones are used for separating fluids of different densities.

Cyclone separators can be installed as single units, or in multiples, known as multi-cyclones. It is also possible to install cyclones in series, or, in parallel.

Separators can be installed with a horizontal or vertical orientation

Gas Cyclone Separators

Gas cyclone separators are grouped into two main categories, reverse-flow and axial-flow.

Reverse flow cyclone separators are cone-shaped. Gas enters the top of the separator body, flows downwards, then flows back upwards and is discharged

Various reverse flow cyclone separator designs exist. Below is another variation of the reverse flow cyclone.

For axial flow (a.k.a. straight through) cyclone separators, gas enters at one end and is discharged at the opposite end. Axial flow separators are not as common as reverse flow separators.

Cut Point

The volumetric flow rate and geometry of the cyclone separator define the cut point. The cut point is the point at which particles are removed from the gas stream at 50% efficiency. This measurement is an industry-standard measurement and can usually be obtained from the original equipment manufacturer.

Efficiency

cyclone’s ability to separate particles from the flowing gas stream. Because particles have different sizes, the efficiency rating is usually given for varying particle sizes.

Empirical models used for cyclone separator efficiency

Lapple Mode

The basic model that assumes laminar flow. appel’s model first calculates the particle diameter (assuming spherical particles) `d_(p50%)` that will have 50% collection efficiency under specific conditions.

`d_(p50%)=sqrt((9mub)/(2piN_eV_irho_p)`,

where `mu` is the viscosity of the gas,

b is the inlet width,

`N_e` denotes the number of effective turns the gas makes within the cyclone (usually empirically measured).

`V_i` is the inlet velocity of the gas

`rho_p` is the particle density

`eta=(1/(1+(d_(p50%)/d_(pj))^2))`

represents the collection efficiency of a specific-sized particle.

Iozia and Leith Model

Assumes turbulent flow.

`d_(p50%)=(0.693/A)^(n+1)`

n is the vortex exponent

`A=2[KQrho_p(n+1)/(18muD_c^3)]^(1/(2(n+1))`

where Q is the gas flow rate

K is the configuration factor

`D_C` is the cyclone diameter

collection efficiency for particle

`eta=1-exp[-0.693(d_(pj)/d_(p50%))^(1/(n+1))]`

Li and Wang Model

the model includes sparticle bounce or re-entrainment and turbulent diffusion at the cyclone wall
Assumption
The radial particle velocity and the radial concentration profile are not constant for uncollected particles within the cyclone.`uR^n=constant`
Boundary conditions with the consideration of turbulent diffusion coefficient and particle bounce re-entrainment on the cyclone wall
`c_0=c` at `theta=0`
collection efficiency for particle
`eta=1-exp(-lamdatheta)`
`theta=(2pi(S+L))/a`
`lamda=((1-alpha)Komega)/(D_rr^n)`
`k=((1-n)(rho_p-rho_g)d^2Q)/(18mub(r_w^(1-n)-r_n^(1-n))`

Koch and Licht Mode

turbulent nature of cyclones and the distribution of gas residence times within the cyclone
The tangential velocity of a particle is equal to the tangential velocity of the gas flow,
there is no slip in the
Assumption
the tangential direction between the particle and the gas.
The tangential velocity is related to the radius of cyclone `uR^n=constant`
`eta=1-exp(-2[(GtauQ)/D^3(n+1)]^(0.5/(n+1)))`
factor related to the configuration
`G=(8K_c)/(K_a^2+K_B^2)`
related to the vortex
`n=1-(1-(12D)^(0.14)/2.5)((T+460)/530)^0.3`
relaxation term
`tau=(rho_pd_p^2)/(18mu)`
Boundary condition Injection
Inlet
reflect

The particle rebounds the off the boundary in question with a change in its momentum as defined by the coefficient of restitution.

The normal coefficient of restitution defines the amount of momentum in the direction normal to the wall that is retained by the particle after the collision with the boundary

where is the particle velocity normal to the wall and the subscripts 1 and 2 refer to before and after the collision, respectively. Similarly, the tangential coefficient of restitution defines the amount of momentum in the direction tangential to the wall that is retained by the particle.

A normal or tangential coefficient of restitution equal to 1.0 implies that the particle retains all of its normal or tangential momentium after the rebound (an elastic collision). A normal or tangential coefficient of restitution equal to 0 implies that the particle retains none of its normal or tangential momentum after the rebound.

Nonconstant coefficients of restitution can be specified for wall zones with the reflect type boundary condition. The coefficients are set as a function of the impact angle.

trap

The trajectory calculations are terminated and the fate of the particle is recorded as \"trapped\'\'. In the case of evaporating droplets, their entire mass instantaneously passes into the vapour phase and enters the cell adjacent to the boundary. In the case of combusting particles, the remaining volatile mass is passed into the vapour phase.

escape

The particle is reported as having \"escaped\'\' when it encounters the boundary in question. Trajectory calculations are terminated.

wall-jet

that the direction and velocity of the droplet particles are given by the resulting momentum flux, which is a function of the impingement angle, \"$\\phi$\", and Weber number.

The wall-jet boundary condition assumes an analogy with an inviscid jet impacting a solid wall. The equation shows the analytical solution for an axisymmetric impingement assuming an empirical function for the sheet height ( \"$H$\") as a function of the angle that the drop leaves the impingement

`H(Psi)=H_pie^(beta(1-Psi/pi)`

`Psi=-pi/betaln(1-P(1-e^-beta))`

`sin(phi)=(e^beta+1)/((e^beta-1)(1+(pi/beta)^2))`

where \"$H_{\\pi}$\" is the sheet height at \"$\\Psi=\\pi$\" and \"$\\beta$\" is a constant determined from conservation of mass and momentium. The probability that a drop leaves the impingement point at an angle between \"$\\Psi$\" and \"$\\Psi+\\delta\\Psi$\" is given by integrating the expression for

  • The wall-jet boundary condition is appropriate for high-temperature walls where no significant liquid film is formed, and in high-Weber-number impacts where the spray acts as a jet. The model is not appropriate for regimes where film is important (e.g., port fuel injection in SI engines, rainwater runoff, etc.).

  • ``interior\'\' means that the particles will pass through the internal boundary. This option is available only for internal boundary zones, such as a radiator or a porous jump.

It is also possible to use a user-defined function to compute the behaviour of the particles at a physical boundary. See the separate UDF manual for information about user-defined functions.

Because you can stipulate any of these conditions at flow boundaries, it is possible to incorporate mixed discrete phase boundary conditions in your FLUENT model.

CFD Analysis
Geometry extraction
base model
Extracted volume
MESH
case 1a
coarse mesh
Element size- 45, elements- 20727
Element Quality
case 1b
medium mesh
Element size-30, elements- 31219
Element Quality
case1, case2, case3, case4
fine mesh
Element size-10 elements- 407468

Element Quality
setup
Gravity enables
viscous
turbulent
K-epsilon-RNG- swirl generated,
Discrete phase-Model-injection
Surface-inlet
material-anthracite
x-velocity=3m/s
Diameter-5e-6
Boundary condition
velocity inlet-3m/s
outlet top & bottom
case 1a coarse mesh reflect
case 1b medium-mesh reflect
case 1c fine mesh reflect
case 2 fine mesh trap
case 3 fine mesh escaped
case 4 fine mesh wall Jet
Initialize
standard initialize-inlet
Solution

cases

number tracked

escaped

Aborted, trapped,

Evaporated,

Incomplete parallel

incomplete

Element size- 45, elements- 20727

Case1 a reflect

14

14

0

0

Element size-30, elements- 31219

Case1 b reflect

40

40

0

0

Element size-10 elements- 407468

Case 1 reflect

364

333

0

31

Case 2

trap

364

333

0

31

Case 3

escaped

364

333

0

31

Case 4

Wall Jet

364

333

0

31

Residuals
case 1 a
case 1 b
case 1
case 2
case 3
case 4
Result
case 1 a
Particle Tracking
Vortex
case 1 b
Particle Tracking
Vortex
Case1
Particle Tracking
Vortex
Case 2
Particle Tracking
Vortex
Case 3
Particle Tracking
Vortex
Case 4
Particle Tracking
Vortex
Conclusion
with different cases in reflection, it has been found out in
case1a
14 particle tracking inlet boundary condition which means face with 14 mesh
Case 1b
40 particle tracking inlet boundary condition which means face with 40 mesh
Case 1,2,3,4
364 particle tracking inlet boundary condition which means face with 364 mesh
to obtain more particle analysis we need to give finer mesh acording to our need

Source

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232747389_A_CFD_Study_on_the_Prediction_of_Cyclone_Collection_Efficiency

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8fa7/5d638204d999abd3c73b564db714818de5be.pdf

https://savree.com/en/product/cyclone-separator-working-principle-dust-separator/

Skill lynk

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.