Challenge

Week 5: Prandtl Meyer Shock problem

Shock Wave

strong pressure wave in an elastic medium such as air, water, or a solid substance, produced by supersonic aircraft, explosions, lightning, or other phenomena that create violent changes in pressure. The edge of the cone forms a supersonic wavefront with an unusually large amplitude called a "shock wave, Shock waves alter the mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties of solids and, thus, can be used to study the equation of state (a relation between pressure, temperature, and volume) of any material.

Prandtl–Meyer expansion

A supersonic expansion fan, technically known as Prandtl–Meyer expansion fan, a two-dimensional simple wave, is a centered expansion process that occurs when a supersonic flow turns around a convex corner. The fan consists of an infinite number of Mach Waves, diverging from a sharp corner. When a flow turns around a smooth and circular corner, these waves can be extended backward to meet at a point.

Each wave in the expansion fan turns the flow gradually (in small steps). It is physically impossible for the flow to turn through a single "shock" wave because this would violate the second law of Thermodynamics.

Across the expansion fan, the flow accelerates (velocity increases) and the Mach number increases, while the Static Pressure, Temperature, and Density decrease. Since the process is Isentropic, the Stagnation properties (e.g. the total pressure and total temperature) remain constant across the fan

A fundamental relation between the gas velocities before and after the normal shock and critical velocity of sound is derived this known as the Prandtl-Meyer relation

`(sqrt((r+1)/(r-1)))*arctan(sqrt(((r-1)/(r+1))*(M^2)-1)))-arctan(sqrt(M^2-1))`

BOUNDARY Condition

Solver

Solver: Steatystate

Simulation mode: Fully hydrodynamic

gas flow solver: compressible

Simulation time parameter

Steady-State Analysis (SS)

Inlet: Since it’s a supersonic flow at the inlet we should assign Dirichlet boundary conditions for all parameters like Pressure, Velocity, and Temperature. So, We can give Static pressure= 101000 Pa, Velocity=678m/s and Temperature=286k

Outlet: At the outlet, we should assign Neumann boundary conditions for all parameters like Pressure, Velocity, and Temperature. So, We can give a Zero normal gradient for all the parameters.

Top-Bottom wall:
Since the supersonic flow is inviscid in nature(the viscous effect is negligible) we can assume the Slip condition at the wall.

Front-Back: 2D Wall
Reason: The 2D planar assumption is used because the flow gradients along the z-direction are negligible when compared to the other two directions. By reducing the model to 2D, the Prandtl Meyer can be simulated and analyzed cost-effectively compared to a full 3D model.

Region

v-678 m/s

P-50000Pa

Base Grid

dx,dy,dz-0.8

Adaptive grid

min cell-1

max cell-2000000

Embed frequency-1

Release Frequency-25

Temperature control

Embedded Type-Subgrid scale (SGS)

maximum embedding level-2

start cyl-5000

end cyl-9999999

Prandtl Meyer Shock problem Using Different cases

sub Grid-`Grid size=(base grid)/2^(embed-Level)`

S.NO Description Sub Grid Criteria

initial

mesh

size

medium mesh size more refined Mesh
1 case1 0.025 4322 5924 7643
2 case2 (base mesh) 0.05 4322 8697 12437
3 case 3 0.1 4322 4914 5224

Incodition calculation

"""
Analysis study of prandtl-Meyer
Program by Jagaveerapandiyan
"""
import numpy as np

c=678
a=343 #m/s
P1=101000 #pa
T1=286 #k
r=1.4

#Mach no
M1=(c/a)
print('Mach initial=',M1)
#first Mach line angle
mu1=np.arcsin(1/M1)
print('angle of fist Mach line=',mu1,'deg')
#maximum turning angle
nu_max=(np.pi/2)*((np.sqrt((r+1)/(r-1)))-1)
print('maximum turning angle=',nu_max,'deg')

#Prandtl_Meyer Function
vM1=(np.sqrt((r+1)/(r-1)))*np.arctan(np.sqrt(((r-1)/(r+1))*(pow(M1,2)-1)))-np.arctan(np.sqrt(pow(M1,2)-1))
print('Prandtl Meyer Function=',vM1)
#Maximum Turning angle
theta=nu_max-vM1
print("Maximum Turning angle=",theta,'deg')

Mach initial= 1.9766763848396502
angle of fist Mach line= 0.530424671306974 deg
maximum turning angle= 2.276853163690696 deg
Prandtl Meyer Function= 0.4491560159071164
Maximum Turning angle= 1.8276971477835797 deg

Result

Case1

Calculation output Cygwin

Cell Count

cell count ss volume count

cell count graph

Temperature Gradient contour

Temperature SS

Temperature outlet

Pressure Gradiant contour

Pressure SS

Pressure outlet

Velocity Gradient contour

velocity SS

velocity outlet

Density Gradient contour

Density outlet

Density SS

Mach outlet

Case2

Calculation output Cygwin

Cell count

cell count graph

cell count ss volume count

Temperature Gradient contour

Temperature SS

Temperature outlet

Pressure Gradiant contour

Pressure SS

Pressure outlet

Velocity Gradient contour

Velocity SS

Velocity outlet

Density Gradient contour

Density SS

Density outlet

Mach outlet

Case3

Calculation output Cygwin

Cell count

cell count ss volume count

cell count graph

Temperature Gradient contour

Temperature SS

Temperature outlet

Pressure Gradiant contour

Pressure SS

Pressure outlet

Velocity Gradient contour

Velocity SS

Velocity outlet

Density Gradient contour

Density SS

Density outlet

Mach outlet

the separation, the oscillatory flow structures, the heat transfer localization, and the pressure loads would be induced accordingly. In this survey, recent advances on the shock wave/boundary-layer interaction and its control in the internal and external flow fields were summarized, and it is obvious that the micro-vortex generator has been widely used in both the internal and external flow fields to suppress the separation induced by the shock wave/boundary-layer interaction, and the quantitative measurement and assessment approaches should be developed

Conclusion

Angle of physics changes

angle of fist Mach line= 0.530424671306974 deg
maximum turning angle= 2.276853163690696 deg

Due to step in model slip condition on the wall as compressible supersonic flow separation occurs was there a sudden change in physical property inflow and model which can be taken into consideration

From the study of Sub Grid Criteria with different value case1 which is finer mesh the output value at the stream from flow separator gives smooth output towards theta degree where value increases the quality of result output decreases

by absorbing the flow separation region we can reduce the effect by using different technic and the

Reference

https://www.britannica.com/science/shock-wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prandtl%E2%80%93Meyer_expansion_fan

https://physics.info/shock/

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.