Challenge

Week 5: Prandtl Meyer Shock problem

Shock Wave and Boundary Conditions

Shock wave or shock is a type of propagating disturbance that moves faster than the local speed of sound in the medium. Like an ordinary wave, a shock wave carries energy and can propagate through a medium but is characterized by an abrupt, nearly discontinuous, change in temperature, pressure and density of the medium. The boundary conditions used are Dirichlet boundary condition, Neumann boundary Conditions and Mixed boundary condition.

Objective

To simulate Prandtyl Meyer Shock problem with variations in the SGS parameter for a velocity of 680 m/s at the inlet.

Geometry

Above is the geometry with the following dimensions 65,45.1525 and 8.151 in x,y,and z directions.

Boundary Conditions of Case 1

Inlet

Boundary type - Inlet

Pressure BC-Zero Normal Gradient

Velocity BC- 680m/s

Temperature BC- 286.1 K

Outlet

Boundary type -Outlet

Pressure BC- Zero Normal Gradient

Velocity BC- Zero Normal Gradient

Front and Back

Boundary type -2-D

Top and Bottom

Boundary type - Wall

Velocity BC- Slip

Temperature BC- Zero Normal Gradient

Mesh

For the mesh the control is given as follows base size of 0.8m with adaptive mesh refinement is activated. Above figure show the mesh grid.

Temperature AMR

Maxmium Cell - 200000

Embed type - Sub-Grid Scale Size

Max Embeddind Level- 2

Sub Grid Criterion-0.05,0.025 and 0.01.

Case 1- 0.05 SGS

Cell Count

With the SGS of 0.05 the cell count reached about 7682 cells at the end of the cycle.

Temperature

Above are the temperature plot and its contour during the the simulations.The Temperature at the inlet remains same 286.1K through the entire simulation. At the Outlet the started higher about 300K and begins to decrease as throughout the cycles because the flow spreads from a minute point to a braod area. The spreading can be viewd in the contour plots.

Animation of case 1 with 0.05 SGS

Case 1-0.025 SGS

The Sub Criterion - 0.025.

Cell Count

The Cell count for this case at the end of the simulation is 12673 cells with fluctations in the cycle during the simulation.

Temperature

From the temperature plots and from the contour we can see that the inlet temperature remains the same in the whole cycle. But the outlet temperature oscillates tremendously reaching the about 467 K of max temperature and falls down to 268 K at the end.

The SGS parameter is little bit more finer than the pervoius paramter setting which can be seen in the final mesh.

Animation of case 1 with 0.025 SGS

case 1 -0.01 SGS

The Sub Criterion for this case is 0.01.

Cell Count

The cell count for this case is at the end of the cycle is 15984 cells with a maximum cell count of 30878 cells during the cycle.

Temperature

During the simulation the temperature attains the max temperarure of 502 K and decreases to minimium of 268 K which less than the inlet temperature which was at a constant of 286.1 K.

The SGS parameter for this case is extremely finer compared to the other SGS parameter with the same Boundary conditons applied.

Animation of case 1 with 0.01 SGS

Case 2 - 0.05

This second case with changes in the inlet velocity.

Boundary Conditions of Case 2

Inlet

Boundary type - Inlet

Pressure BC-Zero Normal Gradient

Velocity BC- 100 m/s

Temperature BC- 286.1 K

Outlet

Boundary type -Outlet

Pressure BC- Zero Normal Gradient

Velocity BC- Zero Normal Gradient

Front and Back

Boundary type -2-D

Top and Bottom

Boundary type - Wall

Velocity BC- Slip

Temperature BC- Zero Normal Gradient

Temperature AMR

Maxmium Cell - 200000

Embed type - Sub-Grid Scale Size

Max Embeddind Level- 2.

Sub Grid Criterion- 0.05.

Cell Count

For this case the cell count reaches a maximium of 9595 cells and at the end simulation the cell count is about 7626 cells.

Temperature

The temperature for this case reached a maximium of 467 K at the outlet boundary falls down to 268 K till the end of the simulation this is because the temperature falls down as the flow spread vastly. The Inlet temperaure remains the same of 286.1 K.

The SGS parameter in this case is similar to the case 1 parameter.

Animation of case 2 with 0.05 SGS

Conclusion

In comparing the SGS parameter for the the inlet velocity of 680 m/s the 0.01 SGS value is more effective when compared to the other SGS values.

Smaller the SGS value higher the Cell Count with smooth distribution.

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.