Analysing Sheet metal Bending process with three different materials
Objective
To perform Sheet metal bending for 3 different materials mentioned below.
Case 1: Aluminium Alloy 1199( mentioned in the course video),Copper Alloy NL and Magnesium Alloy NL.
Case 2: With the material as Aluminium Alloy, value of friction coefficient is 0.19.
Case 3: With Aluminium alloy as material, changing the mesh size.
Importing the CAD model
The CAD model is imported and viewed in spaceclaim and checked for any errors.
The model has a punch and die arrangement with sheet metal as workpiece.
Simulation setup
Material assignment
The punch and die are assigned with structural steel and the sheet metal is assigned with three different metals namely. Aluminium Alloy 1199,Copper Alloy NL and Magnesium Alloy NL.
Contact Definition
The contact between punch and sheet metal as well as the contact between sheet metal and die are defined as frictional contact with frictional coefficient of 0.1
For case (2) the frictional contact is increased to 0.19
Mesh generation
The sheet metal and the faces of punch and die which come in contact with sheet are alone meshed with an element size of 1mm.
Other parts are meshed with an element size of 4mm.
For case (3) - the sheet metal and the faces of punch and die which come in contact with sheet are alone meshed with an element size of 1.5 mm. The sheet metal elements are of tetrahedrons type
Analysis settings
Displacement of Punch
The top and side faecs of punch are selected and given a downward displacement in Y-axis in a tabular form
Displacement of sheet and die
The sheet metal is given zero displacement in Z-axis and X-axis direction. It is done to avoid any lateral movement.
The die is fixed and doesn't have any degree of freedom
Case (1) - Aluminium alloy 1199
Directional deformation (Y-axis)
Equivalent Strain
Equivalent Stress
Case (1) - Copper alloy NL
Directional deformation (Y-axis)
Equivalent Strain
Equivalent Stress
Case (1) - Magnesium alloy NL
Directional deformation (Y-axis)
Equivalent Strain
Equivalent Stress
Case (2) - Aluminium alloy 1199 with friction coefficient of 0.19
Directional deformation (Y-axis)
Equivalent Strain
Equivalent Stress
Comparing the results
Case (1) - Among the three materials used Aluminium alloy 1199 has the least amount of stress developed.
Case (2) - with Aluminium alloy 1199 as material, changing the friction coefficient from 0.1 to 0.19 doesn't affect the results.
Case (3) - with Aluminium alloy 1199 as material, increasing the mesh size from 1mm to 1.5mm doesn't affect the results.
The results can be further verified by performing a grid dependency test.
Ansys file link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AcHL5hf4TTpw9HfEGfWbD8UqFEYy68zL/view?usp=sharing
- 1073453678Hello! Ansys file link is failure, could you update link? Thank you!