Challenge

Project

Q.Carry out a system-level simulation of an all-terrain vehicle.

Prepare a technical report explaining the model properties & comments on the results.

A.

Aim:To study and analyze BAJA ATV

OBJECTIVE:Prepare a technical report explaining the model properties & comments on the results.

Facts and History About ATV

The History term "All-Terrain Vehicle" or ATV is used in a general sense to describe any of a number of small open motorized buggies and tricycles designed for off-road use. However, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) defines an ATV as a vehicle that travels on low pressure tires, with a seat that is straddled by the operator, and with handlebars for steering control. By the current ANSI definition, it is intended for use by a single operator, although a change to include 2-seaters (in tandem) is under consideration.

Photo: Honda 1970 ATC

The rider sits on and operates these vehicles like a motorcycle, but the extra wheels give more stability at slow speeds. Although typically equipped with three or four wheels, six-wheel models exist for specialized applications. Engine sizes of ATVs currently for sale in the United States (as of 2008 products) range from 49cc to 1000cc and 49cc to 700cc for two stroke ATVs.


ATV Terminology

Four wheeled versions are most commonly called "quads," "four-wheelers" or "ATVs" in the United States and Canada, and "quad bikes" or "quad cycles" in other English-speaking countries. In Australia, ATVs are also known as "forbys", and in Israel can be called "Polarises" (After the company). Models with three wheels are typically known as "three-wheelers," and ATCs (or less commonly "All-Terrain Cycles" and "trikes").

ATVs can also be considered Off Highway Vehicles (OHV) or Off Road Vehicles (ORV), along with motorcycles.

Early days

ATVs were made in the United States a decade before 3- and 4-wheeled vehicles were introduced by Honda and other Japanese companies. During the 1960s numerous manufacturers offered similar small off-road vehicles, that were designed to float and were capable of traversing swamps, ponds and streams as well as dry land. Typically constructed from a hard plastic or fiberglass "tub", they usually had six wheels - all driven - with low pressure (around 3 PSI) balloon tires, no suspension (other than what the tires offered) and used a skid-steer steering setup. These early amphibious models were the original all-terrain vehicles - or ATVs. Contrary to todays ANSI definition of an ATV, they were intended for multiple riders, sitting inside, and would usually have steering wheels or control sticks rather than motorcycle-type handle bars as stipulated in the current definition.

Since the advent of three- and four-wheeled, straddled ATVs, these have more or less 'taken over' the term, leaving the 6x6 and 8x8 floating variety now mostly known as AATVs (Amphibious All-Terrain Vehicles). Current brands of these machines include Argo and MAX. Though not as fast as other ATVs, they can be operated with precision at slow speeds, and of course, have the ability to float. The spinning action of the tires is enough to propel the vehicle through the water, albeit slowly. Outboard motors can be added for extended water use.

Three wheelers

Honda made the first three-wheeled ATVs in 1970, which were famously portrayed in the James Bond movie, "Diamonds Are Forever". Dubbed the US90 and later - when Honda acquired the trademark on the term - the ATC90, it was designed purely for recreational use. Clearly influenced by earlier ATVs, it featured large balloon tires instead of a mechanical suspension. By the early 1980s, suspension and lower-profile tires were introduced. The 1982 Honda ATC200E Big Red was a landmark model. It featured both suspension and racks, making it the first utility three-wheeled ATV. The ability to go anywhere on terrain that most other vehicles could not cross soon made them popular with US and Canadian hunters, and those just looking for a good trail ride. Soon other manufacturers introduced their own models.

Sport models were also developed by Honda, which had a virtual monopoly on the market, due to effective patents on design and engine placement. The 1981 ATC250R was the first high-performance three-wheeler, featuring full suspension, a 248-cubic-centimetre two-stroke motor, a five-speed transmission with a manual clutch and a front disc brake. For the sporting trail rider, the 1983 ATC200X was another landmark machine. It has an easy-to-handle 192-cubic-centimetre four-stroke that was ideal for new participants in the sport.

Over the next few years, All manufacturers except Suzuki developed high performance two-stroke engined machines to compete against Honda's monopoly on the market, but did not sell as many due to the reputation already secured by Honda in the market. These models were the Yamaha Tri-Z YTZ250 with a 246-cubic-centimetre two-stroke engine, manual clutch and 5 or 6 speed gearbox, and also the Kawasaki Tecate KXT250 with a 249-cubic-centimetre two-stroke, 5 speed gearbox in both generations and a manual clutch.

Four wheelers

Suzuki was a leader in the development of 4-wheeled ATVs. It sold the first ATV, the 1982 QuadRunner LT125, which was a recreational machine for beginners.

In 1985, Suzuki introduced to the industry the first high-performance 4-wheel ATV, the Suzuki LT250R QuadRacer. This machine was in production for the 1985-1992 model years. During its run, it underwent three major engineering makeovers. However, the major core features were retained. These were: a sophisticated long-travel suspension, a liquid-cooled two-stroke motor and a fully manual 5-speed transmission for 85-86 models and a 6-speed transmission for the 87-92 models.



It was a machine exclusively designed for racing by highly skilled riders.


Honda responded a year later with the FourTrax TRX250R - a machine that has not been replicated.



Kawasaki responded with its Tecate-4 250.



In 1987, Yamaha introduced a different type of high-performance machine, the Banshee 350, which featured a twin-cylinder liquid-cooled two-stroke motor from the RD350LC street motorcycle. Heavier and more difficult to ride in the dirt than the 250s, the Banshee became a popular machine with sand dune riders thanks to its unique power delivery. The Banshee remains hugely popular, but 2006 was the last year it will be available in the U.S. (due to EPA emissions regulations). In Canada, however, the Banshee will be back for the 2007 model year, still featuring the same parallel-twin, 350cc, two-stroke engine that made the machine famous.

At the same time, development of utility ATVs was rapidly escalating. The 1986 Honda FourTrax TRX350 4x4 ushered in the era of four-wheel drive ATVs. Other manufacturers quickly followed suit, and 4x4s have remained the most popular type of ATV ever since. These machines are popular with hunters, farmers, ranchers and workers at construction sites.

Safety issues with 3-wheel ATVs caused all manufacturers to switch to 4-wheeled models in the late '80s, and 3-wheel models ended production in 1987, due to consent decrees between the major manufacturers and the Consumer Product Safety Commission -- the result of legal battles over safety issues among consumer groups, the manufacturers and CPSC. The lighter weight of the 3-wheel models made them popular with some expert riders. Cornering is more challenging than with a 4-wheeled machine because leaning into the turn is even more important. Operators may roll over if caution isn't used. The front end of 3-wheelers obviously has a single wheel making it lighter, and flipping backwards is a potential hazard, especially when climbing hills. Rollovers may also occur when traveling down a steep incline. The consent decrees expired in 1997, allowing manufacturers to once again make and market 3-wheel models, though there are very few marketed today.

Models continue today to be divided into the sport and utility markets. Sport models are generally small, light, two wheel drive vehicles which accelerate quickly, have a manual transmission, and run at speeds up to 90 miles per hour (145 km/h). Utility models are generally bigger four wheel drive vehicles with a maximum speed of up to 72.5 miles per hour (104 km/h). They have the ability to haul small loads on attached racks or small dump beds. They may also tow small trailers. Due to the different weights, each has advantages on different types of terrain.

Six wheel models often have a small dump bed, with an extra set of wheels at the back to increase the payload capacity. They can be either 4 wheel drive (back wheels driving only), or 6 wheel drive.

Racing models

Sport models are built with performance, rather than utility, in mind. To be successful at fast trail riding, an ATV must have light weight, high power, good suspension and a low center of gravity. These machines can be modified for such racing disciplines as motocross, woods racing (also known as hare scrambles, cross country), desert racing, hill climbing, ice racing, speedway, TT (Tourist Trophy), flat track, drag racing and others. Examples of high-performance models include the Yamaha YFZ450, Honda TRX450R,Suzuki QuadRacer R450, Kawasaki KFX450R, and Can-Am DS450. ATVs designed for fast trail riding include the Yamaha Raptor 700R/660R,Suzuki QuadSport Z400, Yamaha Warrior 350, Honda Sportrax 400EX, kawasaki kfx400,Bombardier/Can-Am DS650, Arctic Cat DVX400, Polaris Scrambler 500, Polaris Outlaw 500, Polaris Outlaw 525, Kawasaki KFX700, Polaris Predator 500 and Can-Am Renagade 800. Three wheel performance models include the Honda ATC250R, Yamaha Tri-Z YTZ250 and Kawasaki Tecate KXT250, All manufactured in the 80's. Three Wheelers designed for fast trail riding include the Honda ATC350X and the Honda ATC200X.

ATV parts and accessories

Honda ATV History 101

If necessity was the mother of the first ATV, Honda engineer Osamu Takeuchi was its father. In 1967, American Honda asked Honda R&D Ltd. for a new product dealers could sell when motorcycle sales cooled off in the winter. Mr. Takeuchi was assigned to lead the project, along with a small group of Honda engineers. This was clearly the group for the job, since Takeuchi and company had been working to develop other new recreational vehicles that never saw production. These projects gave Takeuchi the tools to develop Honda's first ATV, the US90.
Forget the proverbial blank sheet of paper. Takeuchi started in the shop with a head full of ideas and an eclectic assortment of components. Two-, three-, four-, five- and even six-wheeled configurations were examined, but the three-wheel concept delivered the best combination for the machine's intended mission. It dealt with snow, mud and assorted slippery conditions a two-wheeler couldn't, while providing more maneuverability than other configurations.

In the early stages, a Honda ST(TM)70 motorcycle gave up its 70cc four-stroke single-cylinder engine for the cause, along with assorted chassis parts. An extended rear axle carried cultivator wheels designed to handle rough terrain. Two driving wheels in the rear worked well. Cultivator tires didn't. The biggest challenge would be finding a tire capable of getting a grip on soft, changeable terrain such as snow, sand and mud. Two wheels, three wheels, four wheels or more? Motorcycle tires weren't an option.

The design process quickened when American Honda sent Takeuchi an American invention called the Amphi-Cat& that rolled on six 20-inch low-pressure, high-flotation balloon tires. The light bulb went on. Revamping his ST70-based prototype to accept the new low-pressure rolling stock, he went to work on his own tire design, ending up with a 22-inch tire inflated to 2.2 psi. With the tire dilemma solved, the 70cc engine lacked the muscle necessary to push a full-sized rider through snow or mud. A 90cc engine running through a special dual-range four-speed gearbox added the requisite flexibility over varied terrain.

The next phase of development was optimizing the chassis to match the new engine and tires. Testing over rough roads, sand hills and slopes as steep as 35 degrees gradually established chassis dimensions effective for recreational riding as well as agricultural work. Laid out in the shape of an isosceles triangle with the footpegs located outside the triangle to optimize control, the ATC design was unique enough to let Takeuchi patent the arrangement.

Exhaustive testing brought other lessons to light as well. Using a thumb throttle instead of the typical motorcycle twist grip let riders shift their weight for optimal vehicle maneuverability while maintaining precise throttle control. A rear differential was considered, but discarded when a live axle performed better. Though suspension is an integral part of the modern ATV, Takeuchi's original balloon tires soaked up rough terrain best by themselves. Exerting less pressure on soft or sensitive terrain than the average human foot, those tires let the vehicle go places others couldn't, leaving little or no evidence of their passing-an advantage that looms large in hundreds of modern ATV applications.

The 1970s: The World's First ATC
Officially introduced to America in 1970, the US90 sent its 7 horsepower through a dual-range four-speed gearbox with automatic clutch, and sold for $595. It was renamed the ATC90 later that year as Honda trademarked the ATC name. Three models carried that Honda ATC monogram through the 1970s. The ATC70 gave younger riders a scaled-down version of the fat-tire experience. And by the end of the decade, requests for more power turned the original ATC90 into the ATC110 in 1979. The ATC was as evolutionary as it was revolutionary from the beginning.
Good as the original fat tires were on snow and sand, they were vulnerable to punctures from things such as stubble from harvested crops. The fact that those original tires weren't repairable compounded the problem, so a fabric carcass was added, and steel hubs replaced the first hubless wheel design in 1975. Tougher, color-impregnated plastic fenders were added in 1975 as well.

Though it was primarily a recreational vehicle through the '70s, farmers were beginning to see the ATC as a tool to make their lives easier. Honda engineers followed their machines into the field, gathering data to guide the machine's natural adaptation to a rapidly growing market. The ATC was as capable at labor as at leisure, and America was catching on.

The 1980s: An Expanding Marketplace
Moving into the '80s, the two arenas looming largest in the ATV lexicon were utility and racing. The popularity of utility usage was easy to understand. On the farm, a tractor cost exponentially more to purchase and maintain, and an ATV uses 8 percent of the fuel necessary to feed a tractor. Consequently utility usage exploded in the 1980s and ATVs became multi-purpose machines, serving both recreational and utility purposes. This multi-purpose usage grew from 30 percent of total usage in 1985 to approximately 80
percent of today's ATV market.

Introduced in 1980, the ATC185 was popular among utility users. Rolling on larger, 25-inch tires that afforded improved traction, the 185 featured a five-speed transmission with an automatic clutch, and a 180cc four-stroke single-cylinder engine that was considerably more powerful as well. Though designed to split its duties more or less equally between work and play, the 185 set the stage for Honda's first purpose-built utility ATV two years later.

The 1982 ATC200E, a.k.a. Big Red(R), had more of everything necessary to get a host of jobs done. Its 192cc engine and five-speed dual-range gearbox cranked out more power, especially low in the rev band, to make chores such as towing, spraying, seeding and fertilizing easier. An electric starter in addition to the standard recoil system made starting the day as easy as pushing a button. Dual racks and a 9.2-liter storage box made carrying tools, hay bales, fencing and other agricultural essentials easier. A new sealed rear drum brake survived the muddy fields and water crossings, and telescopic-fork front suspension made a day in the saddle that much more comfortable. Big Red added a reverse gear in 1984, and its drive chain was replaced with shaft drive for extra durability and less maintenance.

The other major ATV theme of the '80s-racing-was being played out everywhere from frozen lakes in the East to Western deserts to the dirt ovals of Middle America. Racing was an essential part of Honda from its founding in 1948. Thus it became part of ATC vocabulary as well, and the introduction of the ATC250R in 1981 put the rest of the world on official notice that Honda was as serious about winning on three wheels as it was on two. The world's first high-performance two-stroke ATC adapted Honda's CR(R) motocross technology to the three-wheel world with predictable results, taking hordes of unsuspecting competitors by storm.

Running unofficially in the 1980 Baja 1000 on pre-production ATC250Rs, a group of Honda associates surprised racing legend Mickey Thompson when they caught and passed him pre-running for the race. Honda's first official ATC racing participation came in the SCORE-sanctioned 1981 Parker 400 held in the Arizona desert. Thanks to Thompson's considerable influence, an official three-wheel class was sanctioned in the 1981 Baja 1000. In 1984, Honda's ATC250Rs started just behind the motorcycles rather than from the very back of the starting order, and then finished first and second in class, putting them fourth and fifth overall. Nothing on four wheels finished ahead of the ATCs. The three entries that did well were all large-displacement motorcycles, including Honda's race-winning XR(TM);. Honda raised the bar in 1985 with an all-new, liquid-cooled version of the 250R that cranked out 38 horsepower and offered nearly 10 inches of suspension travel at both ends, giving it the power to do disappearing acts ahead of other brands at race tracks across the country.

Though it was never as successful in the desert as the more potent 250R, the ATC200X that debuted in '83 proved that Honda four-strokes could run with the best of them. The 200X combined a high-performance 192cc engine, five-speed gearbox and manual, motorcycle-style clutch with long-travel suspension and sporty chassis geometry that was more at home ripping up race tracks than handling farm chores.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, building ATVs to endure the stress of utility use put Honda R&D on a steep learning curve. Approaching the mid-'80s, ATVs were inspected, dissected and exhaustively scrutinized with more data acquisition equipment than any other Honda product. Machines were run hour after hour, day after day for weeks, with riders wearing 50-pound instrument packs that recorded information on every aspect of the machine's operation. As the market's swing toward utility continued, Honda's research made it clear that the next step in the ATV's evolution would be another wheel. Thus Honda's first four-wheel ATV, the TRX200, debuted in 1984.

The market responded almost immediately, making 1984 Honda's biggest sales year for ATVs. The 370,000 units delivered in 1984 remain the high-water mark for Honda ATV sales, making up a full 69 percent of total ATV sales in the U.S. that year. The upswing in utility use and the introduction of the four-wheel TRX200 were also the beginning of the end for Takeuchi's three-wheel matrix. Four-wheelers were considered more versatile tools by customers, and tools were what people wanted most.

By 1986 the smart money was all on four wheels in the ATV world. The ground-breaking Honda TRX250R made an unmatched four-wheel performance statement with a liquid-cooled 246cc two-stroke engine similar to the ATC250R's. On the utilitarian end of the spectrum, Honda unveiled the first four-wheel-drive ATV that same year. The FourTrax(TM); 350 4x4 arrived at its coming out party in grand style-lowered from a helicopter to show all four wheels moving under their own power. Market forces were already at work to replace three wheels with four.

In 1984, skyrocketing ATV sales led to an increase in accidents, prompting an investigation by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). In 1986, CPSC statistics suggested that most ATV accidents were due to improper rider behavior that ignored the distributor's warnings. No inherent flaw was found in the three-wheel or four-wheel ATV design.

Honda's owner's manuals and product warning labels stressed the importance of proper ATV operation to its customers. Through a national industry safety campaign, there was a 33 percent decline in recorded CPSC injury statistics between 1984 and 1988.

Nevertheless, on April 28, 1988, the U.S. ATV distributors entered into an unprecedented 10-year agreement with the CPSC called the Final Consent Decree. Under the agreement, the ATV industry made a $100-million commitment to expand existing safety programs. Among the many components of this agreement, free training and training incentives were offered to owners and purchasers of new ATVs. Additionally, distributors would no longer market three-wheel ATVs, repurchasing any unsold three-wheel models from dealer inventory.

Although three-wheel ATV sales were trailing off across the board at the time, and Honda had already introduced a line of four-wheel ATVs, the CPSC agreement did serve to accelerate the process.

On the eve of the '90s, Honda introduced the 1988 FourTrax 300 and FourTrax 300 4x4, the revolutionary pair of hard-working Hondas that would ultimately become the most versatile, most popular ATVs in history. Combining an ideal balance of size, weight, power and capacity, the 300s sold more than 530,000 units over the ensuing 12 years. Powered by a 282cc air-cooled four-stroke single-cylinder engine, the FourTrax 300 sent its 20 horsepower through a five-speed transmission, automatic clutch and maintenance-free shaft drive. An ultra-low first gear helped it tow up to 850 pounds. Tough steel racks let it carry up to 66 pounds in front and 132 pounds in the rear. And if the hardest-working ATV in America ended up packing tackle to your favorite bass fishing spot on Saturday morning, nobody else had to know.

The 1990s: Workhorse Of The '90s

Throughout the 1980s, more and more people saw the ATV as a vehicle capable of getting thousands of different jobs done faster and easier. By the time the '90s rolled in, the Honda FourTrax had become an essential part of the great American toolbox. You'd be hard pressed to find a Louisiana rice farm, Washington apple orchard or Montana cattle ranch that didn't have at least one.

From copper mines to banana plantations, golf courses to pig farms, forest reclamation projects to shopping center maintenance, nothing on wheels had ever been as versatile, reliable, efficient and affordable, on the job or on the weekend, as the Honda ATV.

Though sport models such as Honda's FourTrax 300EX and the new-for-'99 400EX are immensely popular with sport and recreational riders, industry observers estimate that 85 percent of ATV use in the '90s revolved around some sort of enterprise. Mr. Takeuchi's idea had grown up, gone to work and done a good job. When asked what products had the greatest impact on their farming operations since 1967, the readers of Farm Industry News ranked the Honda ATV right up there with Dekalb Biotype E Sorghum, A3127 Hybrid Soybeans and the Miller Electric Mig Welder as a Landmark Product of the last 25 years. That's high praise from one of the most brutally sensible groups of people on the planet.

In America, having a FourTrax on the job makes a host of jobs more efficient. In countries without our infrastructure, manpower and financial resources, the Honda ATV's reliability and efficiency handle jobs that simply couldn't be done before. Folks on other parts of the planet were discovering what America had discovered a decade before, and began putting Honda ATVs to work, performing all manner of work that was either impossible, impractical or both. Whereas Honda ATVs were largely a domestic phenomenon before 1990, they're currently working in more than 35 different countries worldwide.

The 1995 Foreman 400 4x4 introduced the working world to the strongest, most efficient Honda ATV yet. Powered by an innovative longitudinal engine design that positions the crankshaft perpendicular to its axles, the '95 Foreman's front and rear drive shafts transfer power to all four wheels with fewer power-robbing directional changes, fewer parts, less weight and a lower center of mass.

In 1997 Honda introduced the advantages of its longitudinal power train to a broader circle of ATV users with the FourTrax Recon, a mid-size 2WD ATV that works hard and can scurry down a trail better than anything in its class.

In 1998 Honda debuted its Electric Shift Program (ESP) on an all-new 450cc ATV, the Foreman ES. Combining the convenience of an automatic with the control of a manual gearbox, ESP allowed Foreman ES riders to shift up or down with push-button ease. Honda's meticulous approach means the only thing harder than building the toughest ATVs on earth is improving them. Improving the single most popular ATV model, the FourTrax 300 series, was a truly difficult undertaking.

Moving into the new millennium, the Rancher lineup achieved just that. Putting the compact, powerful efficiency of the 329cc longitudinal-powered drive train in an all-new chassis creates a better version of what was arguably the most versatile multipurpose ATV ever created.

Responding to a skyrocketing market's demands for even more hard-working horsepower and a true automatic transmission in an ATV with Honda innovation and durability, the 2001 Rubicon is introduced in the spring of 2000. The largest, most powerful multi-purpose Honda ATV ever is also the most innovative. Muscle from its liquid-cooled overhead-valve longitudinally mounted 500cc engine flows through an all-new, continuously variable Hondamatic transmission with enough original ideas inside to have more than 100 patents pending.

One of Honda's greatest strengths has always been its ability to create all-new products that don't fit in existing categories-such as the original US90. Honda does it again with the 2003 FourTrax Rincon to create the world's most comfortable ATV. It features taut, modern SUV styling, Honda's largest-displacement ATV engine, plus liberal use of aluminum to reduce weight. Conversely, Honda has also easily expanded a product's versatility to satisfy a broader audience, and that's the case with the 2004 FourTrax Rancher AT/FourTrax Rancher AT GPSCAPE. An all-new longitudinally mounted 397cc OHV single, SUV-influenced styling, plus a smaller, more efficient Hondamatic automatic transmission with Electronic Shift Program and, on GPSCAPE models, an integrated GPS unit, only broaden the Ranchers' appeal as the world's best all-around ATVs.

Honda ATV Model History Timeline, 1970-Present

1970 ATC90
"What Is It?" asks Honda's advertising brochure. Just a revolutionary off-road vehicle destined to launch a whole new industry that will sell more than 6.5 million machines*. Honda's first ATV is a three-wheel ATC, or All-Terrain Cycle, originally named the US90; the name was later changed to ATC90. The 89cc four-stroke single cranks out 7 horsepower and features extras such as a Swivel-Lok(TM) handlebar for easy loading in a trunk or station wagon.
*Estimated industry sales from 1970-August 1999

1973 ATC70
Honda releases an economical little brother to the popular ATC90 intended for youngsters. Features include foot guards, easy-to-operate brakes and a U.S. Forest Service-approved spark arrester.

1979 ATC110
With a larger, 105cc four-stroke engine, a dual-range four-speed transmission, a parking brake and an enclosed drive chain, the more powerful ATC110 proves a popular successor to the venerable ATC90.

1980 ATC185
Introduced as Honda's most powerful three-wheeler, the new 180cc engine cranks out twice the muscle of an ATC110. Equipped with a five-speed semi-automatic transmission with an ultra-low first gear, the ATC185 could be equipped with optional Hondaline& front and rear racks and a trailer hitch to convert the super-trike into a super-mule.

1981 ATC250R
The first true high-performance ATC is powered by Honda's air-cooled 248cc two-stroke, complete with an engine counterbalancer to reduce vibration. Designed for experienced riders, the ATC250R wins legions of loyal customers with its adjustable front and rear suspension, front disc brake-both ATC firsts-and a close-ratio five-speed manual transmission.

1982 ATC200E Big Red
One year later Honda introduces the first ATC designed for utility, the 192cc electric-start Big Red. With standard front and rear cargo racks, Big Red features telescopic-fork front suspension and a dual-range five-speed semi-automatic transmission.

1983 ATC200X
ATC sales are booming when Honda introduces this XR-type high-performance single-cylinder four-stroke with full suspension and lightweight aluminum wheels. Honda's reputation for performance and durability makes the 282-pound 200X one of the industry's most successful sport ATVs.

1984 Big Red (ATC200ES)
Big Red matures in 1984 with the addition of reverse gear, a virtually maintenance-free shaft drive and a 700-pound towing capacity.

1984 TRX200
Honda's first four-wheel ATV is powered by a durable, single-cylinder four-stroke engine running through a five-speed dual-range transmission with shaft drive and reverse. Front and rear racks make it an indispensable tool for thousands of jobs.

1986 FourTrax 250R (TRX250R)
Honda introduces the definitive high-performance ATV in the FourTrax 250R. Equipped with a liquid-cooled counterbalanced two-stroke single-cylinder engine, six-speed close-ratio manual transmission, fully adjustable front and rear suspension and triple disc brakes, the 328-pound 250R is designed for expert riders seeking the ultimate sport/competition ATV.

1986 FourTrax 4X4 (TRX350)
Honda's first ATV with full-time four-wheel drive features a limited-slip front differential. This powerful workhorse is equipped with a tough 350cc four-stroke engine, a vibration-reducing counterbalancer and a fan-assisted oil cooler as standard equipment.

1987 FourTrax 250X (TRX250X)
The TRX250X is a 246cc four-stroke sport model featuring a five-speed transmission with reverse and adjustable suspension. It becomes very popular with sport ATV riders. Honda also coins the FourTrax name in 1986 for its four-wheel ATV lineup.

1987 FourTrax Foreman 4X4 (TRX350D)
One year after the successful launch of the FourTrax 4x4, the celebrated Foreman name is born. The 350cc Foreman 4x4 features front and rear racks, a high-output, 310-watt alternator and an 850-pound towing capacity.

1988 FourTrax 300 (TRX300)
Honda introduces a totally new 282cc four-stroke-powered ATV that is 42 pounds lighter than the popular TRX250 it replaces. The new 300 uses McPherson& strut front suspension to deliver a plush ride and tight turning radius.

1988 FourTrax 300 4X4 (TRX300FW)
Honda adds full-time four-wheel drive, double-wishbone front suspension and a limited-slip front differential to the FourTrax 300 to produce the best-selling ATV of all time. The FourTrax 300 series of 2WD and 4WD ATVs enjoys an incredible production run through the 2000 model year, selling a combined total of more than 530,000 units.

1993 FourTrax 300EX (TRX300EX)
Honda's FourTrax 300EX replaces the successful TRX250X sport ATV, adding 36cc of displacement and the convenience of electric starting. The 300EX is acknowledged as one of the best trail riding ATVs ever made.

1994 FourTrax 90 (TRX90)
Honda releases an ATV designed for riders age 12 and older. Roomy ergonomics and smooth-running 89cc four-stroke engine make this a popular ATV.

1995 FourTrax Foreman 400 (TRX400FW)
The next Honda ATV to proudly display the Foreman name features a torquey, longitudinally mounted 395cc engine designed to minimize frictional losses. A new overhead-valve design shortens the height of the engine, permitting more ground clearance and a lower center of mass. Weighing up to 50 pounds less than its rivals, the Foreman is a nimble machine when the workday is over and the fun begins.

1997 FourTrax Recon (TRX250)
Honda's value-packed, light-utility Recon is an immediate success. Featuring the same longitudinal engine layout as the larger Foreman 400, the Recon offers full-size ergonomics and dependable shaft drive.

1998 FourTrax Foreman S/ES (TRX450S/TRX450ES)
Honda's largest and most powerful ATV arrives in two versions: the manual-shift Foreman S and the electric-shift Foreman ES. Introduced in a market increasingly drawn to competitors with automatic transmissions, the ES is named the ATV of the Year by ATV Magazine. Honda's Electric Shift Program (ESP) gearbox offers the convenience of an automatic transmission with the durability and engine braking of a conventional transmission, allowing riders to shift up or down with the push of a button.

1999 FourTrax 400EX (TRX400EX)
Honda's first high-performance ATV in more than a decade immediately awakens the sleeping ATV sport industry. Using an XR400-derived four-stroke power plant and a cast aluminum swingarm-another industry first-the 374-pound 400EX is an instant success on the showroom floor and at the track.

2000 FourTrax Ranchers (TRX350TM/TE/FM/FE)
The four Rancher models-2WD and 4WD-conventional or ESP-controlled electric shifting-replace the ever-popular FourTrax 300s. Four-wheel-drive versions feature a new torque-sensing front differential that sends power to the wheel with the most traction. Utilizing Honda's longitudinally mounted engine design, Rancher engine height is further reduced by a dry-sump lubrication system carrying oil in a separate tank inside the engine cases. With more ground clearance and an even lower center of gravity, the multi-purpose Ranchers handle as well as some competitor's sport machines.

2001 FourTrax Foreman Rubicon (TRX500)
Honda stuns the ATV world with the four-valve liquid-cooled 500cc single-cylinder four-stroke Rubicon-equipped with the revolutionary new Hondamatic(TM) automatic transmission. The Hondamatic is compact, quiet, rugged, maintenance-free, sealed against external contaminants, and features engine braking-all refinements lacking in less sophisticated belt-drive transmissions. Honda's most powerful multi-purpose ATV, the Rubicon features many innovative design features of its siblings: longitudinally mounted, dry-sump OHV engine; torque-sensing front differential; and ESP-controlled shifting in addition to the automatic shifting modes.

2003 FourTrax Rincon (TRX650FA)
Honda introduces the SUV of ATVs-the 2003 Rincon. The world's most comfortable ATV offers up a full host of desirable features, including Honda's largest-displacement ATV engine, a liquid-cooled OHV 649cc single-cylinder powerplant; a radical, new automotive-style automatic transmission; and clean, cool SUV styling cues. Add in Honda's TraxLok selectable 2WD/4WD, torque-sensing front differential, fully independent suspension front and rear, plus liberal use of aluminum components to reduce weight, and you've got one of the most sophisticated and luxurious ATVs available.

2004 FourTrax Rancher AT/FourTrax Rancher AT GPSCAPE (TRX400FA/TRX400FGA)
The world's best all-around ATV? None other than Honda's FourTrax Rancher. And for 2004 Honda takes the Rancher's strengths to a whole new level. The '04 Rancher AT features an all-new 397cc OHV single, in Honda's proven longitudinal placement in the chassis for superior drivetrain efficiency, mated to a second-generation Hondamatic automatic transmission, plus push-button Electronic Shift Program (ESP) for manual "shifting" SUV-influenced styling keeps the Rancher AT's looks fresh, while the addition of a built-in GPSCAPE GPS unit extends the Rancher AT's appeal even further.

INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT ATV FROM IEEE TO CONSTRUCT IT IN REAL TIME.

Using a CAN Bus for Control of an All-Terrain
Vehicle

Abstract—When designing an autonomous All-terrain Vehicle(ATV) one must ensure that the communications paths to all
major subsystems use a robust electrical signaling protocol. Onesuch protocol is the CAN bus. This project describes an effort to utilize a CAN bus to connect existing and new hardware on an ATV. The work involved a redesign of the braking control systemas well as the throttle controls. The redesign was necessary toreplace obsolete or broken components, reduce the amount of extra wiring on board the ATV, and create a robust infrastructurefor future expansion. A CAN bus control node was installed foreach major component on the ATV as well as a master controlnode. The master control node now reads in signals from a remotecontrol receiver and interprets them into commands for the other nodes on the CAN bus. Each node takes the commands received from the CAN bus and drives their respective components. Acontrol node was developed to control the throttle and brakingsystem. A second node was developed to control the steering control system. New control systems were developed for drivingthe brakes and the steering. The ATV can now be driven using aRC controller to operate the brakes, steering, and throttle, and is poised to accept new hardware to make it truly autonomous.
Index Terms—CAN Bus, ATV, Remote Control, RX63N, GRSakura
I. INTRODUCTION
The end goal of this work is to create a fully autonomous ATV. Before making the ATV autonomous, a remote control system needed to be developed. The ATV originally worked by remote control, but many of the original components had been salvaged for other projects. The original microcontroller had to be replaced and all of the wiring had to be redesigned.
A CAN bus was also installed to reduce the amount of wiring
on board the ATV. The CAN bus also makes for easier addition and removal of new components to the system. The steering system had also been redesigned and needed to be integrated
into the new control system. The initial wiring is shown in Figure 2. The control system was broken down into multiple
sections on the CAN bus to make the system more modular.

Each component was assigned to one of three microcontrollers which interpret commands to and from the CAN bus. The control system was seperated into a master control node, a
steering control node, as well as a steering and throttle control node. CAN bus is mostly used in the automotive industry and was developed specifically with cars in mind. CAN bus was
designed to reduce the amount of cable running between all of the sensors and controls inside of a vehicle. Autonomous vehicles typically require a large number of sensors for navigation,
which makes CAN well suited to this application.

Fig. 1. Zapatabot ATV [5]
II. CAN BUS
A. CAN Bus
Since one of the future goals of this work is to add sensors to make the ATV fully autonomous, a Control Area Network (CAN) bus was chosen[4]. A CAN bus allows for the easy addition and removal of components to the system without disturbing the rest of the bus. A CAN bus requires only twowires and a ground for communication between all nodes on the bus. This greatly reduces the amount of cabling runningthroughout the ATV. When a new node needs to be added to the bus, it simply needs to be connected to the two wires already running throughout the ATV. This simplifies addition and removal of nodes over the initial setup. A master control node was developed which interprets the RC controller signals into CAN messages and then transmits them to the other nodes. Another node was also made for controlling the brakes and the throttle. This node reads messages from the CAN bus and interprets them into directions for the brakes and throttle. The steering control node works the same way by interpreting CAN messages into commands to the steering system. A diagram of the overall plan for the CAN bus is 978-1-4799-6585-4/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE

Fig. 2. Initial ATV Wiring [5]
shown in Figure 5.
CAN is an asynchronous TDM protocol. It has a relativelyslow data rate, but makes up for it with very high reliabilit.CAN messages can be heard by all nodes on the bus. Thisallows for easy debugging of multiple components and reducesthe amount of wiring needed to connect each of the nodes for communication. CAN operates using a three wire system.The wires are CAN High, CAN Low, and Ground. Typically CAN devices operate at 5V, but 3.3V devices are also used.In order to communicate via CAN, a CAN module and a CAN transceiver are required. The CAN module is typically embedded into the microcontroller, while the transceiver is an external component. The CAN module is in charge of reading and sending signals to the transceiver and placing valid messages into their respective mailboxes. The CAN transceiveris responsible for converting bits received into a signal across the CAN High and CAN Low wires.
When a 1 is being sent across the bus, both lines are set to 2.5V. When a 0 is sent across the bus, the CAN High line goesto 3.5V and the CAN Low line goes to 1.5V. The transceivers on the bus then use the voltage difference across the lineto determine whether a 1 or 0 is being sent. This is shown in Figure 3.

CAN is unique in the way that it handles bus
arbitration. When two nodes attempt to transmit at the sametime, zeros will overwrite ones. When a node sees that oneof its bits has been overwritten by another node, it will backoff andwait until the message is finished to begin transmitting
again. Since the ID of a message is broadcast first, the first fewbits are often used to indicate the priority of the message. Since
zeros overwrite ones, the ID with the lowest value always has a higher priority. An example is shown in Figure 4.
The SAE J1939 Standard was used in setting up the steeringcontrol node. Since the SAE J1939 standard is common andwas already implemented in the steering node, this protocol
was used for the rest of the system as well. The SAE J1939standard runs at 250kbps. The node for the steering system
.

Fig. 3. CAN Transmission[1]


Fig. 4. CAN Arbitration[1]
was developed using a PIC Microchip microcontroller[6]. The steering control node interprets the first two data bytes into a
steering angle for the wheels and then tricks the steering assist into turning the desired direction. In current network the extended ID mode is used which uses
29 bit identifiers instead of the standard 11 bits. In CAN, each message is given an ID. This ID used to indicate the message type instead of the destination. Each device will have multiple
mailboxes with different IDs in order to read in multiple types of messages. Mailboxes are also given a mask so that they can ignore certain bits such as the priority bits. This also means a mailbox could be set up to ignore all of the bits in an ID and receive all messages sent on the bus. In the current network,
the first 3 bits are used to indicate priority. The last 8 bits are used to indicate the source address of the message. The source address mostly goes unused for now, but is useful for debugging and error messages. The rest of the bits are used for the ID and are the only bits not masked out. Each type of message will have its own unique idea. For now, the only
types of commands used are steering, acceleration, braking, and error messages.
A Renesas RX63N microcontroller was used as the master node for giving the rest of the system commands. The master node is also responsible for interpreting signals from the
remote control. The RX63N development board was chosen because it already has both a CAN module as well as a CAN transceiver on board. The board also has CAN APIs available, which simplified programming of the CAN bus. The master node is responsible for most of the messages on the CAN bus. The other two nodes only transmit startup complete and
978-1-4799-6585-4/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE

Fig. 5. CAN Design Plan,Fig. 6. Throttle Servo Mount[5]
error messages. This will change in the future, after sensors are added to the ATV.The largest disadvantage to using a CAN bus is that eachcomponent now needs an individual microcontroller to control it. The microcontroller is mainly used to interpret the CANmessages into control signals for the devices it is responsible for. The steering and throttle were originally going to be treated as two seperate nodes. They were combined into one node since neither device has complex controls and neither device will be removed from the system since throttle and braking are required for the ATV to drive. The brakes and throttle are both controlled by a Renesas GR-Sakura microcontroller. Since the Sakura board uses an RX63N microcontroller,it already has a CAN module built in. For the transceiver, a Texas Instruments SN65HVD251 Industrial CAN Transceiver was used. Even though the Sakura uses an RX63N, the CANAPIs could not be used, because the APIs were designed specifically with the RX63N development board in mind.
III. OTHER COMPONENTS
A. Throttle and Brakes
As stated previously, both the throttle and the brakes were controlled using a Sakura microcontroller. The throttle control on the Honda ATV was developed by a previous group
and worked well so no modifications were made other than switching control to the Sakura[?]. The throttle is controlled by a standard Parallax servo attached to the throttle via a rapid
prototyped frame. Since the ATV has a spring return on the throttle, it will automatically shut off the throttle when the servo returns to the idle state. The servo and frame are shown
attached to the throttle in Figure 6.The ATV has a hand brake as well as a foot brake. The hand brake is left alone so that the ATV may still be driven by a person without the electronics. A previous group created a frame and attached a linear actuator to the foot brake. The linear actuator was controlled by a custom built H-bridge. The linear actuator and the H-bridge can both be seen in
Figures 8 and 7 respectively. After testing the braking system,

Fig. 7. Braking H-Bridge[5]
a short was found in the H-bridge. Since the H-bridge was large and also had problems with overheating in the past, it was replaced with a Pololu motor controller. The new motor
controller was chosen because it has much higher voltage and
current tolerances. The motor controller also does not require a heat sync unless using more than 15A, whereas the H-bridge
required a large heat sync just to operate at 8A. The Pololu motor controller is also much smaller, allowing it to fit in the new enclosure easily. The original H-bridge is shown in Figure
7.
B. Steering
The first steering system had severe overheating problems[2]. One of the key components of the Electric Power Steering system’s operation is the torque sensor. When a difference in the angle of the wheels and the operator’shandle bar is detected, a change in resistance is output by
the sensor. The sensor has two separate resistive components. One indicates angles to the right, while the other indicates 978-1-4799-6585-4/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE angles to the left. The third wire is connected to ground. A picture of this is shown in Figures 9 and 10.
From experiments using a multi-meter, the following torque sensor system function was discovered[6]:
• Pin A: W/Bu wire = Right Turn. Varies from 13W at
neutral (no steering effort) to 9.5W at maximum steering
effort (meter connected A to C).
• Pin B: Y/R wire =: Left Turn. Same specification as Pin A (connected B to C).
• Pin C: G/O wire = Ground. Continuity with Chassis.
A circuit of parallel resistors was developed with switches to add and remove resistors. PWM is used to emulate intermediate resistances. Since very low resistances were being used, Maxim ICs MAX4668 Dual SPST CMOS Analog Switch was selected to switch resistors on and off. This switch has a low
on resistance of 2.5Ω, making it ideal for this application. A US Digital MAE3 Digital Magnetic Encoder was attached to the steering column to determine the current steering angle.
The encoder is shown in Figure 11. The encoder is used for feedback in the closed loop control system. The new steering system only has overheating problems when attempting to steer while completely stationary. While stationary, the steering system is over damped, causing it to steer slowly and overheat. While moving, the over damping problems should be reduced since the motor will have less resistance from friction. During the steering redesign, the steering controller was also turned into a CAN bus node. This allowed easy integration of the steering controller into the new system. The steering control node is shown in Figures 12 and
13.
C. Remote Control
A Spektrum DX6 transmitter and a BR6000 receiver were used to control the ATV. Theses are typically used for controlling model airplanes. Since this controller is normally

used for yaw, pitch, and roll, most of the channels were not

Fig. 8. Braking Linear Actuator[5],Fig. 9. Torque Sensor Schematic[6]

Fig. 10. Torque Sensor Pluge[6]
Fig. 11. Steering Angle Encoder[6]
978-1-4799-6585-4/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE
Fig. 12. Steering Control Node[6]

Fig. 13. Installed Steering Control Node[6],Fig. 14. Final ATV Wiring
needed. Only one of the joysticks on the controller. Forward and backwards were interpreted into acceleration or braking respectively, since the ATV cannot currently go into reverse on
its own. The RX63N microcontroller read the pulses coming from the receiver and interpreted them into commands for each of the nodes on the bus.
IV. CONCLUSION
The ATV is now fully operational using an RC transmitter. A CAN bus network has been successfully installed on board the ATV. A new control node has been developed for the steering control system. Another node was developed for controlling the throttle and brakes. The remote control functionality as well as the new steering control node have been reintegrated into the system. Also, a new master control node has been completed which takes the radio receiver’s signals and interprets them into commands across the CAN bus. The steering, throttle, and brakes can all be controlled across the CAN bus now. All of the wiring has been placed into enclosures with their respective nodes. The two new nodes are shown in Figure 14. The master control node is in the top right enclosure and the braking and throttle node is in the
bottom left.
V. FUTURE WORK
A kill switch still needs to be added to the system so that the ATV can be shut off in case of an emergency. The kill switch can also act as a simple on off switch. Currently the wiring
is disconnected whenever testing is completed and a switch would simplify this process as well as make it safer. The actuator needs some sort of feedback system to the Sakura.Currently, the Sakura works with the brake by assuming it is in the raised position at startup. Some possible options include adding an LVDT or potentiometer to the actuator. Inthe future sensors will be added to the ATV and integratedinto previous work on path planning algorithms to make it fully autonomous.

How CVTs Work

Nissan HR15DE engine with Xtronic CVT
PHOTO COURTESY NISSAN GLOBAL

Some say you can't teach an old dog new tricks. But the continuously variable transmission (CVT), which Leonardo da Vinci conceptualized more than 500 years ago and is now replacing planetary automatic transmissions in some automobiles, is one old dog that has definitely learned a few new tricks. Indeed, ever since the first toroidal CVT patent was filed in 1886, the technology has been refined and improved. Today, several car manufacturers, including General Motors, Audi, Honda and Nissan, are designing their drivetrains around CVTs.

In this article, we'll explore how a CVT works in a typical rear-wheel driven car, answering several questions on the way:

How does a CVT compare to a conventional, planetary automatic transmission?
  • What parts does it have and how do those parts work?
  • What advantages do CVTs offer over conventional automatic transmissions? What about disadvantages?
  • What's the driving experience like in a car with a CVT?
  • What kind of makes and models incorporate CVTs?
  • Are there any other applications for CVTs other than automobiles?

First, we'll look at how a CVT compares to a traditional automatic transmission.

Transmission Basics

Mercedes-Benz CLK automatic transmission
PHOTO COURTESY DAIMLERCHRYSLER

­If you've read about the structure and function of automatic transmissions in How Automatic Transmissions Work, then you know that the job of the transmission is to change the speed ratio between the engine and the wheels of an automobile. In other words, without a transmission, cars would only have one gear -- the gear that would allow the car to travel at the desired top speed. Imagine for a moment driving a car that only had first gear or a car that only had third gear. The former car would accelerate well from a complete stop and would be able to climb a steep hill, but its top speed would be limited to just a few miles an hour. The latter car, on the other hand, would fly at 80 mph down the highway, but it would have almost no acceleration when starting out and wouldn't be able to climb hills.

So the transmission uses a range of gears -- from low to high -- to make more effective use of the engine's torque as driving conditions change. The gears can be engaged manually or automatically.

In a traditional automatic transmission, the gears are literally gears -- interlocking, toothed wheels that help transmit and modify rotary motion and torque. A combination of planetary gears creates all of the different gear ratios that the transmission can produce, typically four forward gears and one reverse gear. When this type of transmission cycles through its gears, the driver can feel jolts as each gear is engaged.

CVT Basics

Unlike traditional automatic transmissions, continuously variable transmissions don't have a gearbox with a set number of gears, which means they don't have interlocking toothed wheels. The most common type of CVT operates on an ingenious pulley system that allows an infinite variability between highest and lowest gears with no discrete steps or shifts.

Ford Freestyle Duratec engine with CVT
PHOTO COURTESY FORD MOTOR COMPANY

If you're wondering why the word "gear" still appears in the explanation of a CVT, remember that, broadly speaking, a gear refers to a ratio of engine shaft speed to driveshaft speed. Although CVTs change this ratio without using a set of planetary gears, they are still described as having low and high "gears" for the sake of convention.

Next, we'll look at the different types of CVTs: pulley-based, toroidal and hydrostatic.

No More Gears: A Timeline of CVT Innovation
  • 1490 - da Vinci sketches a stepless continuously variable transmission
  • 1886 - first toroidal CVT patent filed
  • 1935 - Adiel Dodge receives U.S. patent for toroidal CVT
  • 1939 - fully automatic transmission based on planetary gear system introduced
  • 1958 - Daf (of The Netherlands) produces a CVT in a car
  • 1989 - Subaru Justy GL is the first U.S.-sold production automobile to offer a CVT
  • 2002 - Saturn Vue with a CVT debuts; first Saturn to offer CVT technology
  • 2004 - Ford begins offering a CVT

Pulley-based CVTs

Pulley-based CVTs use an ingenious and simple pulley design.
PHOTO COURTESY NISSAN GLOBAL

Peer into a planetary automatic transmission, and you'll see a complex world of gears, brakes, clutches and governing devices. By comparison, a continuously variable transmission is a study in simplicity. Most CVTs only have three basic components:

  1. A high-power metal or rubber belt
  2. A variable-input "driving" pulley
  3. An output "driven" pulley

CVTs also have various microprocessors and sensors, but the three components described above are the key elements that enable the technology to work.

HOWSTUFFWORKS

The variable-diameter pulleys are the heart of a CVT. Each pulley is made of two 20-degree cones facing each other. A belt rides in the groove between the two cones. V-belts are preferred if the belt is made of rubber. V-belts get their name from the fact that the belts bear a V-shaped cross section, which increases the frictional grip of the belt.

When the two cones of the pulley are far apart (when the diameter increases), the belt rides lower in the groove, and the radius of the belt loop going around the pulley gets smaller. When the cones are close together (when the diameter decreases), the belt rides higher in the groove, and the radius of the belt loop going around the pulley gets larger. CVTs may use hydraulic pressure, centrifugal force or spring tension to create the force necessary to adjust the pulley halves.

Variable-diameter pulleys must always come in pairs. One of the pulleys, known as the drive pulley (or driving pulley), is connected to the crankshaft of the engine. The driving pulley is also called the input pulley because it's where the energy from the engine enters the transmission. The second pulley is called the driven pulley because the first pulley is turning it. As an output pulley, the driven pulley transfers energy to the driveshaft.

The distance between the center of the pulleys to where the belt makes contact in the groove is known as the pitch radius. When the pulleys are far apart, the belt rides lower and the pitch radius decreases. When the pulleys are close together, the belt rides higher and the pitch radius increases. The ratio of the pitch radius on the driving pulley to the pitch radius on the driven pulley determines the gear.
HOWSTUFFWORKS

When one pulley increases its radius, the other decreases its radius to keep the belt tight. As the two pulleys change their radii relative to one another, they create an infinite number of gear ratios -- from low to high and everything in between. For example, when the pitch radius is small on the driving pulley and large on the driven pulley, then the rotational speed of the driven pulley decreases, resulting in a lower “gear.” When the pitch radius is large on the driving pulley and small on the driven pulley, then the rotational speed of the driven pulley increases, resulting in a higher “gear.” Thus, in theory, a CVT has an infinite number of "gears" that it can run through at any time, at any engine or vehicle speed.

The simplicity and stepless nature of CVTs make them an ideal transmission for a variety of machines and devices, not just cars. CVTs have been used for years in power tools and drill presses. They've also been used in a variety of vehicles, including tractors, snowmobiles and motor scooters. In all of these applications, the transmissions have relied on high-density rubber belts, which can slip and stretch, thereby reducing their efficiency.

Metal belt design
HOWSTUFFWORKS

The introduction of new materials makes CVTs even more reliable and efficient. One of the most important advances has been the design and development of metal belts to connect the pulleys. These flexible belts are composed of several (typically nine or 12) thin bands of steel that hold together high-strength, bow-tie-shaped pieces of metal.

Metal belts don't slip and are highly durable, enabling CVTs to handle more engine torque. They are also quieter than rubber-belt-driven CVTs.

Toroidal CVTs

Another version of the CVT -- the toroidal CVT system -- replaces the belts and pulleys with discs and power rollers.

Although such a system seems drastically different, all of the components are analogous to a belt-and-pulley system and lead to the same results -- a continuously variable transmission. Here's how it works:

  • One disc connects to the engine. This is equivalent to the driving pulley.
  • Another disc connects to the drive shaft. This is equivalent to the driven pulley.
  • Rollers, or wheels, located between the discs act like the belt, transmitting power from one disc to the other.
HOWSTUFFWORKS

The wheels can rotate along two axes. They spin around the horizontal axis and tilt in or out around the vertical axis, which allows the wheels to touch the discs in different areas. When the wheels are in contact with the driving disc near the center, they must contact the driven disc near the rim, resulting in a reduction in speed and an increase in torque (i.e., low gear). When the wheels touch the driving disc near the rim, they must contact the driven disc near the center, resulting in an increase in speed and a decrease in torque (i.e., overdrive gear). A simple tilt of the wheels, then, incrementally changes the gear ratio, providing for smooth, nearly instantaneous ratio changes.

Hydrostatic CVTs

Both the pulley-and-V-belt CVT and the toroidal CVT are examples of frictional CVTs, which work by varying the radius of the contact point between two rotating objects. There is another type of CVT, known as a hydrostatic CVT, that uses variable-displacement pumps to vary the fluid flow into hydrostatic motors. In this type of transmission, the rotational motion of the engine operates a hydrostatic pump on the driving side. The pump converts rotational motion into fluid flow. Then, with a hydrostatic motor located on the driven side, the fluid flow is converted back into rotational motion.

HOWSTUFFWORKS

Often, a hydrostatic transmission is combined with a planetary gearset and clutches to create a hybrid system known as a hydromechanical transmission. Hydromechanical transmissions transfer power from the engine to the wheels in three different modes. At a low speed, power is transmitted hydraulically, and at a high speed, power is transmitted mechanically. Between these extremes, the transmission uses both hydraulic and mechanical means to transfer power. Hydromechanical transmissions are ideal for heavy-duty applications, which is why they are common in agricultural tractors and all-terrain vehicles.

CVT Benefits

Continuously variable transmissions are becoming more popular for good reason. They boast several advantages that make them appealing both to drivers and to environmentalists. Here are some of the key features and benefits of CVTs:

Features

  • Constant, stepless acceleration from a complete stop to cruising speed
  • Works to keep the car in its optimum power range regardless of how fast the car is traveling
  • Responds better to changing conditions, such as changes in throttle and speed
  • Less power loss in a CVT than a typical automatic transmission
  • Better control of a gasoline engine's speed range
  • Can incorporate automated versions of mechanical clutches

Benefits

  • Eliminates "shift shock" -- makes for a smoother ride
  • Improved fuel efficiency
  • Eliminates gear hunting as a car decelerates, especially going up a hill
  • Better acceleration
  • Better control of emissions
  • Replace inefficient fluid torque converter

In the next section, we'll look at what it's like to drive a CVT-based car.

A CVT Test Drive

Cars with CVTs have been common in Europe for years. But it's taken a while for the technology to gain a foothold in the United States. The first production automobile to offer a CVT in the United States was the Subaru Justy.

PHOTO COURTESY SUBARU JUSTY

Sold between 1989 and 1993, the Justy never attracted the attention of American drivers. So what's different about newer CVT-based cars -- cars like the Saturn Vue, the Audi A4 and A6, the Nissan Murano and the Honda Insight? The best way to answer that question is to take one of these cars for a test drive.

When you step on the gas pedal of a car with a continuously variable transmission, you notice the difference immediately. The engine revs up toward the rpms at which it produces the most power, and then it stays there. But the car doesn't react immediately. Then, a moment later, the transmission kicks in, accelerating the car slowly, steadily and without any shifts. In theory, a car with a CVT should reach 60 mph (100 km/hr) 25-percent faster than the same car with the same engine and a manual transmission [ref]. That's because the CVT converts every point on the engine's operating curve to a corresponding point on its own operating curve.

If you look at the power output curve for the car without a CVT, you can see this to be true. Notice that the tachometer in this situation shows the engine revving up and down with each gear change, which is recorded as a spike in the power output curve (and which the driver feels as a jolt).

CVTs are equally efficient on hills. There is no "gear hunting," because the CVT cycles steplessly down to a gear ratio appropriate for the driving conditions. A conventional automatic transmission shifts back and forth trying to find the right gear, which is far less efficient.

With all of their advantages, CVTs do have some shortcomings. In the United States, they are still trying to overcome an image problem. The Subaru Justy, for example, was known as a gutless micro-car. Traditionally, belt-drive CVTs were limited in the amount of torque they could handle and were larger and heavier than their automatic and manual counterparts. Technological advances have put CVTs in the realm of their competition -- the Nissan Murano's CVT can handle its 3.5-liter, 245-horsepower V6 engine -- but first impressions are hard to overcome.

IN MATLAB/SIMULINK the simulation of baja atv is done and components along with the results are explained below:

Components used:

Signal Builder

Create and generate interchangeable groups of signals whose waveforms are piecewise linearexpand all in page
Library:
Simulink / Sources

Description
The Signal Builder block allows you to create interchangeable groups of piecewise linear signal sources and use them in a model. You can quickly switch the signal groups into and out of a model to facilitate testing. In the Signal Builder window, create signals and define the output waveforms.To open the window, double-click the block. See Signal Groups.

Note

Use the signalbuilder function to create and access Signal Builder blocks programmatically.
Ports
Output
collapse all
Signal 1 — First output signal
scalar | vector | matrix
First output signal from the signal group currently visible in the Signal Builder window.

Data Types: double | bus
Signal n — nth output signal
scalar | vector | matrix
nth output signal from the signal group currently visible in the Signal Builder window. n corresponds to the signal index.

Data Types: double | bus
Block Characteristics
Data Types double
Direct Feedthrough No
Multidimensional Signals No
Variable-Size Signals No
Zero-Crossing Detection Yes

Generic Engine
Internal combustion engine with throttle and rotational inertia and time lag
Library
Simscape / Driveline / Engines


Description
The Generic Engine block represents a general internal combustion engine. Engine types include spark-ignition and diesel. Speed-power and speed-torque parameterizations are provided. A throttle physical signal input specifies the normalized engine torque. Optional dynamic parameters include crankshaft inertia and response time lag. A physical signal port outputs engine fuel consumption rate based on choice of fuel consumption model. Optional speed and redline controllers prevent engine stall and enable cruise control.

Generic Engine Model
By default, the Generic Engine model uses a programmed relationship between torque and speed, modulated by the throttle signal.

Engine Speed, Throttle, Power, and Torque
The engine model is specified by an engine power demand function g(Ω). The function provides the maximum power available for a given engine speed Ω. The block parameters (maximum power, speed at maximum power, and maximum speed) normalize this function to physical maximum torque and speed values.

The normalized throttle input signal T specifies the actual engine power. The power is delivered as a fraction of the maximum power possible in a steady state at a fixed engine speed. It modulates the actual power delivered, P, from the engine: P(Ω,T) = T·g(Ω). The engine torque is τ = P/Ω.

Engine Power Demand
The engine power is nonzero when the speed is limited to the operating range, Ωmin ≤ Ω ≤ Ωmax. The absolute maximum engine power Pmax defines Ω0 such that Pmax = g(Ω0). Define w ≡ Ω/Ω0 and g(Ω) ≡ Pmax·p(w). Then p(1) = 1 and dp(1)/dw = 0. The torque function is:

τ = (Pmax/Ω0)·[p(w)/w].

You can derive forms for p(w) from engine data and models. Generic Engine uses a third-order polynomial form:

p(w) = p1·w + p2·w2 – p3·w3

satisfying

p1 + p2 – p3 = 1, p1 + 2p2 – 3p3 = 0.

In typical engines, the pi are positive. This polynomial has three zeros, one at w = 0, and a conjugate pair. One of the pair is positive and physical; the other is negative and unphysical:

Typical Engine Power Demand Function

Restrictions on Engine Speed and Power
For the engine power polynomial, there are restrictions, as shown, on the polynomial coefficients pi, to achieve a valid power-speed curve.
If you use tabulated power or torque data, corresponding restrictions on P(Ω) remain.
Specify the speed and power as w = Ω/Ω0 and p = P(Ω)/P0 and define the boundaries as wmin = Ωmin/Ω0 and wmax = Ωmax/Ω0. Then:

The engine speed is restricted to a positive range above the minimum speed and below the maximum speed: 0 ≤ wmin ≤ w ≤ wmax.
The engine power at minimum speed must be nonnegative: p(wmin) ≥ 0. If you use the polynomial form, this condition is a restriction on the pi:
p(wmin) = p1·wmin + p2·w2min – p3·wmin3 ≥ 0.
The engine power at maximum speed must be nonnegative: p(wmax) ≥ 0. If you use the polynomial form, this condition is a restriction on wmax: wmax ≤ w+.
Engine Power Forms for Different Engine Types
For the default parameterization, Generic Engine provides two choices of internal combustion engine types, each with different engine power demand parameters.

Power Demand
Coefficient Engine Type:
Spark-Ignition Diesel
p1 1 0.6526
p2 1 1.6948
p3 1 1.3474
Idle Speed Controller Model
The idle speed controller adjusts the throttle signal to increase engine rotation below a reference speed according to the following expressions:

Π=max(Πi ,Πc)
and

d(Πc)dt =0.5⋅(−tanh(4⋅ω−ωrω))−Πcτ
where:

Π — Engine throttle
Πi — Input throttle (port T)
Πc — Controller throttle
ω — Engine speed
ωr — Idle speed reference
ωt — Controller speed threshold
τ — Controller time constant
The controlled throttle increases with a first-order lag from zero to one when engine speed falls below the reference speed. When the engine speed rises above the reference speed, the controlled throttle decreases from one to zero. When the difference between engine velocity and reference speed is smaller than the controller speed threshold, the tanh function smooths the time derivative of the controlled throttle. The controlled throttle is limited to the range 0–1. The engine uses the larger of the input and controlled throttle values. If engine time lag is included, the controller changes the input before the lag is computed.

Redline Controller Model
While the idle speed controller determines the minimum throttle value for maintaining engine speed, the redline controller prevents excessive speed based on a maximum throttle input. To determine the maximum throttle value, the redline controller uses the idle speed controller model equation. However, for the redline controller:

ωr is the redline speed reference.
ωt is the redline speed threshold.
τ is the redline time constant.
Performance
To increase simulation speed, use the default option, No fuel consumption, for the Fuel consumption model parameter.

If you select any other option for the Fuel consumption model, the block solves a nonlinear equation that is required for calculating fuel consumption. The block solves the equation even if the FC port, which reports the fuel consumption rate, is not connected to another block.

When the parameter is set to No fuel consumption, the block does not calculate fuel consumption, even if the FC port is connected to another block.

Limitations
This block contains an engine time lag limitation.

Engine Time Lag
Engines lag in their response to changing speed and throttle. The Generic Engine block optionally supports lag due to a changing throttle only. Time lag simulation increases model fidelity but reduces simulation performance.

Ports
Port Description
B Rotational conserving port representing the engine block
F Rotational Conserving port representing the engine crankshaft
T Physical signal input port specifying the normalized engine throttle level
P Physical signal output port reporting the instantaneous engine power
FC Physical signal output port reporting the fuel consumption rate
Port T accepts a signal with values in the range 0–1. The signal specifies the engine torque as a fraction of the maximum torque possible in steady state at fixed engine speed. The signal saturates at zero and one. Values below zero are interpreted as zero. Values above one are interpreted as one.

Port FC does not output data when the Fuel consumption model parameter is set to No fuel consumption.

Parameters
Engine Torque
The table shows how the visibility of some parameters depends on the option that you choose for other parameters. To learn how to read the table, see Parameter Dependencies.

Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies

Engine Torque
Model parameterization — Choose Normalized 3rd-order polynomial matched to peak power, Tabulated torque data, or Tabulated power data
Normalized 3rd-order polynomial matched to peak power Tabulated torque data Tabulated power data
Engine type — Choose Spark-ignition or Diesel
Speed vector
Maximum power
Torque vector
Speed at maximum power
Interpolation method — Choose Linear or Smooth
Maximum speed
Stall speed
Model parameterization
Select how to model the engine. Choose between these options, each of which enable other parameters:

Normalized 3rd-order polynomial matched to peak power — Parametrize the engine with a power function controlled by power and speed characteristics. This is the default option.
Tabulated torque data — Engine is parametrized by speed–torque table that you specify.
Tabulated power data — Engine is parametrized by speed–power table that you specify.
Engine type
Choose type of internal combustion engine. Choose between Spark-ignition, the default option, and Diesel.

Selecting Normalized 3rd-order polynomial matched to peak power for the Model parameterization parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies table.

Maximum power
Maximum power Pmax that the engine can output. The default is 150 kW.

Selecting Normalized 3rd-order polynomial matched to peak power for the Model parameterization parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies table.

Speed at maximum power
Engine speed Ω0 at which the engine is running at maximum power. The default is 4500 rpm.

Selecting Normalized 3rd-order polynomial matched to peak power for the Model parameterization parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies table.

Maximum speed
Maximum speed Ωmax at which the engine can generate torque. The default is 6000 rpm.

During simulation, if Ω exceeds this maximum, the simulation stops with an error. The engine maximum speed Ωmax cannot exceed the engine speed at which the engine power becomes negative.

Selecting Normalized 3rd-order polynomial matched to peak power for the Model parameterization parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies table.

Stall speed
Minimum speed Ωmin at which the engine can generate torque. The default is 500 rpm.

During simulation, if Ω falls below this minimum, the engine torque is blended to zero.

Selecting Normalized 3rd-order polynomial matched to peak power for the Model parameterization parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies table.

Speed vector
Vector of values of the engine function's independent variable, the speed Ω. The default is [500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 7000] rpm.

The first and last speeds in the vector are interpreted as the stall speed and the maximum speed, respectively. If the speed falls below the stall speed, engine torque is blended to zero. If the speed exceeds the maximum speed, the simulation stops with an error.

Selecting Tabulated torque data or Tabulated power data for the Model parameterization parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies table.

Torque vector
Vector of values of the engine function's dependent variable, the torque τ. The default is [380, 380, 380, 380, 350, 280, 200, 80] N*m.

Selecting Tabulated torque data for the Model parameterization parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies table.

Power vector
Vector of values of the engine function's dependent variable, the power P. The default is [20, 40, 78, 120, 145, 148, 125, 60] kW.

Selecting Tabulated power data for the Model parameterization parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies table.

Interpolation method
Method to interpolate the engine speed–torque or speed–power function between discrete relative velocity values within the range of definition. Choose between Linear, the default choice, and Smooth.

Selecting Tabulated torque data or Tabulated power data for the Model parameterization parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Engine Torque Parameter Dependencies table.

Dynamics
The table shows how the visibility of some parameters depends on the option that you choose for other parameters. To learn how to read the table, see Parameter Dependencies.

Dynamics Parameter Dependencies

Dynamics
Inertia — Choose No inertia or Specify inertia and initial velocity
No inertia Specify inertia and initial velocity
Engine inertia
Initial velocity
Time constant — Choose No lag - Suitable for HIL simulation or Specify time constant and initial value
No lag - Suitable for HIL simulation Specify time constant and initial value
Engine time constant
Initial normalized throttle
Inertia
Select how to model the rotational inertia of the engine block. Choose between these options, each of which exposes other parameters:

No inertia — Engine crankshaft is modeled with no inertia. This option is the default.
Specify inertia and initial velocity — Engine crankshaft is modeled with rotational inertia and initial angular velocity.
Engine Inertia
Rotational inertia of the engine crankshaft. The default is 1 kg*m^2.

Selecting Specify inertia and initial velocity for the Inertia parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Dynamics Parameter Dependencies table.

Initial velocity
Initial angular velocity Ω(0) of the engine crankshaft. The default is 800 rpm.

Selecting Specify inertia and initial velocity for the Inertia parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Dynamics Parameter Dependencies table.

Time constant
Select how to model the time lag of the engine response. Choose between these options, each of which exposes other options:

No lag — Suitable for HIL simulation — Engine reacts with no time lag. This option is the default.
Specify time constant and initial value — Engine reacts with a time lag.
Selecting Specify time constant and initial value exposes other parameters.
For more information, see the Dynamics Parameter Dependencies table.
Engine time constant
Engine time lag. The default is 0.2 s.

Selecting Specify time constant and initial value for the Time constant parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Dynamics Parameter Dependencies table.

Initial normalized throttle
Initial normalized engine throttle T(0), ranging between zero and one. The default is 0.

Selecting Specify time constant and initial value for the Time constant parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Dynamics Parameter Dependencies table.

Limits
Speed threshold
Width of the speed range over which the engine torque is blended to zero as Ω approaches the stall speed. The default is 100 rpm.

Fuel Consumption
The table shows how the visibility of some parameters depends on the option that you choose for other parameters. To learn how to read the table, see Parameter Dependencies.

Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies

Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption model — Choose No fuel consumption, Constant per revolution, Fuel consumption by speed and torque, Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and torque, or Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure
No fuel consumption Constant per revolution Fuel consumption by speed and torque Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and torque Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure
Fuel consumption per revolution
Displaced volume
Revolutions per cycle
Speed vector
Torque vector
Brake mean effective pressure vector
Fuel consumption table
Brake specific fuel consumption table
Interpolation method — Choose Linear or Smooth
Fuel consumption model
Select a model for calculating engine-fuel consumption. Model parameterizations are compatible with standard industrial data. Choose between these options:

No fuel consumption — The default option
Constant per revolution
Fuel consumption by speed and torque
Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and torque
Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure
Some options expose other parameters. For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

No fuel consumption
The block does not calculate fuel consumption even when the FC port, which reports the fuel consumption rate, is connected to another block. Selecting this option increases simulation speed.

Fuel consumption per revolution
Enter the volume of fuel consumed in one crankshaft revolution. The default is 25 mg/rev.

Selecting Constant per revolution for the Fuel consumption model parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

Displaced volume
Enter the volume displaced by a piston stroke. The default is 400 cm^3.

Selecting Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure for the Fuel consumption model parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

Revolutions per cycle
Enter the number of crankshaft revolutions in one combustion cycle — e.g. 2 for a four-stroke engine, or 1 for a two-stroke engine. The default is 2.

Selecting Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure for the Fuel consumption model parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

Speed vector
Enter vector of engine speeds used in lookup table parameterizations. Vector size must match Torque vector size. The default is [1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000] rpm. Selecting Fuel consumption by speed and torque, Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and torque, or Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure for the Fuel consumption model parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

Torque vector
Enter vector of engine torques used in the lookup table parameterizations. Vector size must match Speed vector size. The default is [0, 80, 160, 200, 240, 320, 360, 400] N*m. Selecting Fuel consumption by speed and torque or Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and torque for the Fuel consumption model parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

Fuel consumption table
Enter matrix with fuel consumption rates corresponding to engine speed and torque vectors. The number of rows must equal the number of elements in the Speed vector. The number of columns must equal the number of elements in the Torque vector. The default is [.5, .9, 1.4, 1.6, 1.9, 2.7, 3.4, 4.4; 1, 1.7, 2.7, 3.1, 3.6, 5, 6, 7.4; 1.4, 2.7, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 7.5, 8.5, 10.5; 2, 3.6, 5.8, 6.7, 8, 10.4, 11.7, 13.3; 2.5, 4.8, 7.9, 9.4, 10.8, 14, 16.2, 18.6; 3.1, 6, 10.3, 11.9, 13.8, 18.4, 22, 26.5] g/s.

Selecting Fuel consumption by speed and torque for the Fuel consumption model parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

Brake mean effective pressure vector
Enter vector of brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) values. The default is [0, 250, 500, 625, 750, 1000, 1150, 1250] kPa. The BMEP satisfies the expression:

BMEP=T⋅(2π⋅ncVd)
where:T — Output torque
nc — Number of cycles per revolution
Vd — Cylinder displaced volume
Selecting Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure for the Fuel consumption model parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

Brake specific fuel consumption table
Selecting Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and torque or Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure for the Fuel consumption model parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

For the Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and torque fuel model, enter the matrix with brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) rates corresponding to engine speed and torque vectors. BSFC is the ratio of the fuel consumption rate to the output power. The number of rows must equal the number of elements in the Speed vector. The number of columns must equal the number of elements in the Torque vector.

For the Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure fuel model, enter the matrix with brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) rates corresponding to engine speed and brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) vectors. BSFC is the ratio of the fuel consumption rate to the output power. The number of rows must equal the number of elements in the Speed vector. The number of columns must equal the number of elements in the Brake mean effective pressure vector.

For both fuel-consumption models, the default is [410, 380, 300, 280, 270, 290, 320, 380; 410, 370, 290, 270, 260, 270, 285, 320; 415, 380, 290, 275, 265, 270, 270, 300; 420, 390, 310, 290, 285, 280, 280, 285; 430, 410, 340, 320, 310, 300, 310, 320; 450, 430, 370, 340, 330, 330, 350, 380] g/hr/kW.

Interpolation method
Select the interpolation method used to calculate fuel consumption at intermediate speed-torque values. Methods are Linear and Smooth. Outside the data range, fuel consumption is held constant at the last value given in the lookup table. Selecting Fuel consumption by speed and torque, Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and torque, or Brake specific fuel consumption by speed and brake mean effective pressure for the Fuel consumption model parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Fuel Consumption Parameter Dependencies table.

Speed Control
The table shows how the visibility of some parameters depends on the option that you choose for other parameters. To learn how to read the table, see Parameter Dependencies.

Speed Control Parameter Dependencies

Speed Control
Idle speed control — Choose Off or On
Off On
Idle speed reference
Controller time constant
Redline control
Redline control — Choose Off or On
Off On
Redline speed
Redline time constant
Redline threshold speed
Idle speed control
Select speed control model. The options are:

Off — Omit idle speed controller. Throttle input is used directly. This option is the default.
On — Include idle speed controller to prevent engine stalling. This option exposes other parameters. For more information, see Idle Speed Controller Model.
Idle speed reference
Enter the value of the speed reference below which speed increases, and above which speed decreases. The default is 1000 rpm.

Selecting On for the Idle speed control parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Speed Control Parameter Dependencies table.

Controller time constant
Enter the value of the time constant associated with an increase or decrease of the controlled throttle. The constant value must be positive. The default is 1 s.

Selecting On for the Idle speed control parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Speed Control Parameter Dependencies table.

Controller threshold speed
Parameter used to smooth the controlled throttle value when the engine’s rotational speed crosses the idle speed reference. For more information, see Idle Speed Controller Model. Large values decrease controller responsiveness. Small values increase computational cost. This parameter must be positive. The default is 1 rpm.

Selecting On for the Idle speed control parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Speed Control Parameter Dependencies table.

Redline control
Select redline control model. Options include Off and On.

Off — Omit redline controller. Throttle depends only on the idle speed controller. This option is the default.
On — Include redline controller to prevent excessive speed. This option exposes other parameters.
For more information, see the Speed Control Parameter Dependencies table.
Redline speed
Enter the value of the speed reference above which the redline control activates. The default is 5000 rpm.

Selecting On for the Redline control parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Speed Control Parameter Dependencies table.

Redline time constant
Enter the value of the time constant associated with an increase or decrease of the controlled throttle. The constant value must be positive. The default is 1 s.

Selecting On for the Redline control parameter exposes this parameter.

For more information, see the Speed Control Parameter Dependencies table.

Redline threshold speed
Specify the width of the region around the redline speed where the controller goes from fully enabled to not enabled. The block uses this parameter for smoothing the controlled throttle value when the engine’s rotational speed crosses the redline speed reference. Large values decrease controller responsiveness. Small values increase computational cost. This parameter must be positive. The default is 1 rpm.

Selecting On for the Redline control parameter exposes this parameter.

Ideal Rotational Motion Sensor

Motion sensor in mechanical rotational systems

  • Library:
  • Simscape / Foundation Library / Mechanical / Mechanical Sensors

Description

The Ideal Rotational Motion Sensor block represents an ideal mechanical rotational motion sensor, that is, a device that converts an across variable measured between two mechanical rotational nodes into a control signal proportional to angular velocity or angle. You can specify the initial angular position (offset) as a block parameter.

The sensor is ideal since it does not account for inertia, friction, delays, energy consumption, and so on.

Connections R and C are mechanical rotational conserving ports that connect the block to the nodes whose motion is being monitored. Connections W and A are physical signal output ports for velocity and angular displacement, respectively.

The block positive direction is from port R to port C. This means that the velocity is measured as ω = ωR – ωC, where ωR, ωC are the absolute angular velocities at ports R and C, respectively.

Ports

Output

collapse all

W — Angular velocity, rad/s
physical signal

Physical signal output port for angular velocity.

A — Angular displacement, rad
physical signal

Physical signal output port for angular displacement.

Conserving

collapse all

R — Rod (positive probe)
mechanical rotational

Mechanical rotational conserving port associated with the sensor positive probe.

C — Case (reference probe)
mechanical rotational

Mechanical rotational conserving port associated with the sensor negative (reference) probe.

Parameters

expand all

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.