Project-1: Powertrain for aircraft in runways

the aircraft gross weight is the total aircraft weight at any moment during the flight or ground operation.

An aircraft's gross weight will decrease during a flight due to fuel and oil consumption. An aircraft's gross weight may also vary during a flight due to payload dropping or in-flight refuelling.

At the moment of releasing its brakes, the gross weight of an aircraft is equal to its takeoff weight. During flight, an aircraft's gross weight is referred to as the en-route weight or in-flight weight.

MTOW-Maximum Take off weight

MLW-Maximum Landing Weight

Type	MTOW [kg]	MLW [tonnes]	TOR [m]	LR [m]	ICAO category	FAA category
Antonov An-225	640,000	591.7	3500		Heavy	Super
Scaled Composites Model 351 Stratolaunch	589,670		3660		Heavy	Super
Airbus A380-800	575,000	394	3100	1930	Heavy	Super
Boeing 747-8F	447,700	346.091	3100	1800	Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 747-8	443,613	306.175	3100		Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 747-400ER	412,770	295.742	3090		Heavy	Heavy
Antonov An-124-100M	405,060	330	2520	900	Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 747-400	396,900	295.742	3018	2179	Heavy	Heavy
Lockheed C-5 Galaxy	381,000	288.417	2530	1494	Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 747-200	377,840	285.700	3338	2109	Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 747-300	377,840	260.320	3222	1905	Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A340-500	371,950	240	3050	2010	Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A340-600[8]	367,400	256	3100	2100	Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 777F	347,800	260.816	2830		Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 777-300ER	351,800	251.29	3100		Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 777-200LR	347,450	223.168	3000		Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 747-100[7]	340,200	265.300			Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A350-1000	308,000	233.5			Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 777-300	299,370	237.683	3380		Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 777-200ER	297,550	213.00	3380	1550	Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A340-300[8][9]	276,700	190	3000	1926	Heavy	Heavy
McDonnell Douglas MD-11	273,300	185	2990	1890	Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A350-900	270,000	175	2670	1860	Heavy	Heavy
Ilyushin Il-96M	270,000	195.04	3115	2118	Heavy	Heavy
McDonnell Douglas DC-10	256,280	183	2990	1890	Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 787-9[10]	254,000	192.777	2900		Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 787-10[10]	254,000	201.849			Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A340-200[8][11]	253,500	181	2990		Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A330-900	251,000	191	3100		Heavy	Heavy
Ilyushin IL-96-300	250,000	175	2600	1980	Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A330-300[12][13]	242,000	185	2500	1750	Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A330-200[12][13]	242,000	180	2220	1750	Heavy	Heavy
Lockheed L-1011-500	231,300	166.92	2636		Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 787-8[10]	228,000	172.365	3300	1695	Heavy	Heavy
Lockheed L-1011-200	211,400				Heavy	Heavy
Ilyushin IL-86	208,000	175			Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 767-400ER	204,000	158.758	3414		Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A300-600R[14]	192,000	140	2385	1555	Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 767-300ER	187,000	136.08	2713	1676	Heavy	Heavy
Concorde	185,000	111.1	3440	2220	Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A300-600[14]	163,000	138	2324	1536	Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 767-300	159,000	136.078	2713	1676	Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A310-300[14]	157,000	124	2290	1490	Heavy	Heavy
Vickers VC10	152,000	151.9			Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 707-320B[15]	151,000	97.5			Heavy	Heavy
Boeing 707-320C[15]	151,000	112.1			Heavy	Heavy
Douglas DC-8-61	147,000				Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A310-200[14]	142,000	123	1860	1480	Heavy	Heavy
Airbus A400M	141,000	122	980	770	Heavy	Heavy
Douglas DC-8-32	140,000				Heavy	Heavy
Douglas DC-8-51	125,000				Medium	Large
Boeing 757-300	124,000	101.6	2550	1750	Medium	Large
Boeing 707-120B[15]	117,000	86.3			Medium	Large
Boeing 757-200	116,000	89.9	2347	1555	Medium	Large
Boeing 720B[16]	106,000	79.5			Medium	Large
Boeing 720[16]	104,000	79.5			Medium	Large
Tupolev Tu-154M	104,000	80			Medium	Large
Tupolev Tu-204SM	104,000	87.5	2250		Medium	Large
Convair 880	87,500				Medium	Large
Boeing 737-900	85,000	66.36	2500	1704	Medium	Large
Boeing 737-900ER	85,000	71.35	2804	1829	Medium	Large
Boeing 727-200 Advanced[17]	84,000	70.1			Medium	Large
Airbus A321-100[18]	83,000	77.8	2200	1540	Medium	Large
Boeing 737-800	79,000	65.32	2308	1634	Medium	Large
Boeing 727-200[17]	78,000	68.1			Medium	Large
McDonnell-Douglas MD-83	73,000	63.28			Medium	Large
Boeing 727-100[17]	72,500	62.4			Medium	Large
Boeing 727-100C[17]	72,500	62.4			Medium	Large
McDonnell-Douglas MD-90-30	71,000	64.41	2165	1520	Medium	Large
de Havilland Comet 4	70,700				Medium	Large
Boeing 737-700	70,000	58.06	1921	1415	Medium	Large
Airbus A320-100[18]	68,000	66	1955	1490	Medium	Large
Boeing 737-400	68,000	54.9	2540	1540	Medium	Large
de Havilland Comet 3	68,000				Medium	Large
Boeing 377	67,000				Medium	Large
Boeing 737-600	66,000	54.66	1796	1340	Medium	Large
Airbus A220-300	65,000	57.61	1890	1494	Medium	Large
Hawker Siddeley Trident 2E	65,000				Medium	Large
Airbus A319[18]	64,000	62.5	1850	1470	Medium	Large
Boeing 737-300	63,000	51.7	1939	1396	Medium	Large
Boeing 737-500	60,000	49.9	1832	1360	Medium	Large
Airbus A220-100	59,000	50.80	1463	1356	Medium	Large
Airbus A318[18]	59,000	57.5	1375	1340	Medium	Large
Boeing 717-200HGW	55,000	47.174	1950		Medium	Large
Douglas DC-7	55,000				Medium	Large
de Havilland Comet 2	54,000				Medium	Large
Boeing 717-200BGW	50,000	46.265	1950		Medium	Large
de Havilland Comet 1	50,000				Medium	Large
Douglas DC-6A	48,600				Medium	Large
Douglas DC-6B	48,500				Medium	Large
Embraer 190[19]	48,000	43	2056	1323	Medium	Large
Caravelle III	46,000				Medium	Large
Fokker 100	46,000	39.95	1621	1350	Medium	Large
Douglas DC-6	44,000				Medium	Large
Avro RJ-85	42,000	36.74			Medium	Large
Handley Page Hermes	39,000				Medium	Large
Embraer 175[20]	37,500	32.8	2244	1304	Medium	Large
Bombardier CRJ900[21]	36,500	33.345	1778	1596	Medium	Large
Embraer 170[22]	36,000	32.8	1644	1274	Medium	Large
Bombardier CRJ700	33,000	30.39	1564	1478	Medium	Large
Douglas DC-4	33,000				Medium	Large
Vickers Viscount 800	30,400				Medium	Large
Bombardier Q400	28,000	28.01	1219	1295	Medium	Large
Bombardier CRJ200	23,000	21.319	1918	1479	Medium	Large
ATR 72-600	22,800	22.35	1333	914	Medium	Large
Saab 2000	22,800	21.5	1300		Medium	Large
Embraer ERJ 145	22,000	19.3	2270	1380	Medium	Large
ATR 42-500	18,600	18.3	1165	1126	Medium	Small
Saab 340	13,150	12.930	1300	1030	Medium	Small
Embraer 120 Brasilia	11,500	11.25	1560	1380	Medium	Small
BAe Jetstream 41	10,890	10.570	1493	826	Medium	Small
Learjet 75[23]	9,752	8.709	1353	811	Medium	Small
Pilatus PC-24[24]	8,300	7.665	893	724	Medium	Small
Embraer Phenom 300[25]	8,150	7.65	956	677	Medium	Small
Beechcraft 1900D	7,765	7.605	1036	853	Medium	Small
Cessna Citation CJ4[26]	7,761	7.103	1039	896	Medium	Small
de Havilland Hercules	7,000				Medium	Small
Embraer Phenom 100	4,800	4.43	975	741	Light	Small

Airspeed vs. Ground Speed

As mentioned above, true airspeed is simply the speed at which an aircraft is moving relative to the air it is flying in. As such, it’s also the speed at which the air is flowing around the aircraft’s wings.

Ground speed, on the other hand, is the aircraft’s speed relative to the ground. One thing that should be noted here is that it’s its horizontal rather than vertical speed – an aircraft climbing completely vertically would have a ground speed of zero.

In other words, while airspeed is what determines whether there is enough airflow around an aircraft to make it fly, ground speed is what determines how fast an aircraft will get to its destination.

Wind’s Effect on Ground Speed

The relationship between airspeed and ground speed is fairly simple. Ground speed is simply the sum of airspeed and wind speed.

If the aircraft is flying in the same direction as the wind is blowing, the aircraft experiences tailwind, and its ground speed is higher than its airspeed. On the other hand, if the wind is blowing against the direction the aircraft is traveling in, the aircraft experiences headwind, and its ground speed is lower than its airspeed.

solution 3

Why is it not recommended to use aircraft engine power to move it on the ground at Airport?

The risks which may arise from engine ground running relate to the potential for loss of control of the aircraft by those persons occupying the pilot seats in the flight deck. Unwanted consequences from such static running are mainly related to those arising from the unintended movement of the aircraft during engine running - effectively a loss of control - especially during high power engine running. Damage can occur to the aircraft itself, other aircraft nearby or to airside structures. In addition, there is a risk of injury to ground support personnel who may be in relatively close proximity to the aircraft.

When modern jet engines are operated at rated thrust levels, the exhaust wake can exceed 375 mi/h (325 kn or 603 km/h) immediately aft of the engine exhaust nozzle. This exhaust flow field extends aft in a rapidly expanding cone, with portions of the flow field contacting and extending aft along the pavement surface (fig. 1). Exhaust velocity components are attenuated with increasing distance from the engine exhaust nozzle. However, an airflow of 300 mi/h (260 kn or 483 km/h) can still be present at the empennage, and significant people and equipment hazards will persist hundreds of feet beyond this area. At full power, the exhaust wake speed can typically be 150 mi/h (130 kn or 240 km/h) at 200 ft (61 m) beyond the airplane and 50 to 100 mi/h (43 to 88 kn or 80 to 161 km/h) well beyond this point.

The extensive noise arises from the engine power also dangerous for humans and other living things around the vicinity.

Hence for the above reasons it is not recommended to use engine power to move on the ground.

4. How an aircraft is pushed to runway when its ready to take off?

In aviation, pushback is an airport procedure during which an aircraftis pushed backwards away from an airport gate by external power. Pushbacks are carried out by special, low-profile vehicles called pushback tractors or tugs.

Although many aircraft are capable of moving themselves backwards on the ground using reverese thrust (a procedure referred to as a powerback), the resulting jetblast or propwash might cause damage to the terminal building or equipment. Engines close to the ground may also blow sand and debris forward and then suck them into the engine, causing damage to the engine. A pushback is therefore the preferred method to move the aircraft away from the gate.

Pushbacks at busy aerodromes are usually subject to ground control clearance to facilitate ground movement on taxiways. Once clearance is obtained, the pilot will communicate with the tractor driver (or a ground handler walking alongside the aircraft in some cases) to start the pushback. To communicate, a headset may be connected near the nose gear.

Since the pilots cannot see what is behind the aircraft, steering is done by the pushback tractor driver and not by the pilots. Depending on the aircraft type and airline procedure, a bypass pin may be temporarily installed into the nose gear to disconnect it from the aircraft's normal steering mechanism.

Once the pushback is completed, the towbar is disconnected, and any bypass pin removed. The ground handler will show the bypass pin to the pilots to make it clear that it has been removed. The pushback is then complete, and the aircraft can taxi forward under its own power.

5.Learn about take off power, tyre design, rolling resistance, tyre pressure, brake forces when landing.

Take-Off Power:

For light aircraft, usually full power is used during takeoff. Large transport category (airliner) aircraft may use a reduced power for takeoff, where less than full power is applied in order to prolong engine life, reduce maintenance costs and reduce noise emissions. In some emergency cases, the power used can then be increased to increase the aircraft's performance. Before takeoff, the engines, particularly piston engines, are routinely run up at high power to check for engine-related problems. The aircraft is permitted to accelerate to rotation speed (often referred to as V_r). The term rotation is used because the aircraft pivots around the axis of its main landing gear while still on the ground, usually because of gentle manipulation of the flight controls to make or facilitate this change in aircraft attitude (once proper air displacement occurs under / over the wings, an aircraft will lift off on its own; controls are to ease that in).

The nose is raised to a nominal 5°–15° nose up pitch attitude to increase lift from the wings and effect liftoff. For most aircraft, attempting a takeoff without a pitch-up would require cruise speeds while still on the runway.

Tyre Design:

Based on the type of plies used the tyres can be:

Radial ply tires - these tyres feature a flexible casing which is constructed of rubber-coated ply cords which extend around the beads and are substantially at 90° to the centerline of the tread. The casing is stabilized by an essentially inextensible circumferential belt.

Bias ply tires - these tyres feature a casing which is constructed of alternate layers of rubber-coated ply cords which extend around the beads and are at alternate angles substantially less than 90° to the center line of the tread.

Based on the method for containing the inflation gas the tyres can be:

• Tube-type tyres - these require tubes for inflation retention.
• Tubeless tyres - these do not require tubes. They are constructed with an innerliner (integral rubber lining that is engineered to prevent the diffusion of the inflation gas into the casing.).

Rolling Resistance:

The resistance offered by the tyres against motion of vehicle/aircraft is called as rolling resistance, the rolling resistance is produced during take off/landing in the runway.

Tyre Pressure:

Aircraft tires are usually inflated with nitrogen to minimize expansion and contraction from extreme changes in ambient temperature and pressure experienced during flight. Dry nitrogen expands at the same rate as other dry atmospheric gases (normal air is about 80% nitrogen), but common compressed air sources may contain moisture, which increases the expansion rate with temperature.

Tests of airliner aircraft tires have shown that they are able to sustain pressures of maximum 800 psi (55 bar; 5,500 kPa) before bursting. During the tests the tires have to be filled with water, to prevent the test room being blown apart by the energy that would be released by a gas when the tire bursts.

The main landing gear on the Concorde was typically inflated to 232 psi (16.0 bar), whilst its tail bumper gear tires were as high as 294 psi (20.3 bar). The high pressure and weight load on the Concorde tyres were a significant factor in the loss of Air France flight 4590

Brakes Forces When Landing:

In general, when the wheels touch the ground, a set of spoilers raise up quickly, which kills the lift provided by the wings. (There are two sets seen in the image below: ground spoilers that only deploy on landing, and spoilers that are used in flight as speed brakes as well as on landing.) While the spoilers provide some drag, their primary purpose is to stop the plane from actually flying, putting all of the weight on the landing gear and in turn making the brakes that much more effective.

Aircraft have highly-engineered, multi-disc brakes made of a carbon-steel material. Manufacturers include Honeywell and Goodrich, part of Collins Aerospace. In general, the brakes are composed of discs that rotate with the wheel and separate discs that are fixed. When pressure is applied—and below you see pressure applied from the right fixed disc on all of the discs—the entire assembly compresses to create the braking action. Carbon brakes are standard today; they cool faster than steel brakes (their predecessor) and can weigh up to 700 pounds less. That represents a significant weight saving for airlines.

Auto Brakes:

Wheel brakes are usually selected to engage automatically after landing. These are called “autobrakes”.that all airliners have several levels of autobrake “severity”. The crew will decide which is the most appropriate to use for every landing depending upon factors like the length of runway, if it is wet or dry, or if the pilots want to exit the runway at a particular point. “For a short wet runway you might select autobrake 3, or MED on the Airbus. For a long dry runway you might select autobrake 1 or LOW on the Airbus".

6. With necessary assumptions, calculate the force and power required to push / pull an aircraft by a towing vehicle.

The rolling resistance for the air plane can be calculated as

F_r = U.m.g

where

F_r = rolling resistance (N)

cu= rolling resistance coefficient

m = rolling mass (kg)

a = acceleration of gravity (9.81 m/s²)

If the mass of a plane is 50000 kg and the rolling resistance co-efficient between the aircraft wheel and the runway is 0.02

The force required to overcome the rolling resistance can be calculated as

F_r = 0.02 * (50000 kg) *(9.81 m/s²)

= 9810 N

The friction for the puller can be calculated to

F_f = μ W

= μ m_f a_g

where

F_f = frictional force (N)

μ = friction coefficient

W = Weight (N)

m_f = friction mass (kg)

The friction coefficient between a pulling truck rubber wheels and dry runway is 0.9. Since pulling trucks are connected to air crafts nose wheels close to runway we simplify the calculation of required truck mass

m_f = (9810 N) / (0.9 (9.81 m/s²))

=1111kg

Taking radius of the wheel R as 0.3m

The torque is given by T=F*R

T= 7848 * 0.3

= 2354 N.m

The power for pulling/push the aircraft can be calculated as

P=F*V

V= velocity of pull vehicle taken as 5 km/hr

V=1.388 m/s

P=9810*1.388

=13616 W

=13.6kW

Simulink Diagram of powertrain:

Output: