Project-1: Powertrain for aircraft in runways
Part A:
1. Search and list out the total weight of various types of aircrafts.
How to calulate total weight of an aircraft :-

Weight is the force generated by the gravitational attraction of the earth on the airplane. Each part of the aircraft has a unique weight and mass, and for some problems it is important to know the distribution. But for total aircraft maneuvering, we only need to be concerned with the total weight and the location of the center of gravity. The center of gravity is the average location of the mass of any object.
How do engineers determine the weight of an airplane which they are designing?
An airplane is a combination of many parts; the wings, engines, fuselage, and tail, plus the payload and the fuel. Each part has a weight associated with it which the engineer can estimate, or calculate, using Newton's weight equation:
w = m * g
where w is the weight, m is the mass, and g is the gravitational constant which is 32.2 ft/square sec in English units and 9.8 meters/square sec in metric units. The mass of an individual component can be calculated if we know the size of the component and its chemical composition. Every material (iron, plastic, aluminum, gasoline, etc.) has a unique density. Density r is defined to be the mass divided by the volume v:
r = m / v
If we can calculate the volume
m = r * v
The total weight W of the aircraft is simply the sum of the weight of all of the individual components.
W = w(fuselage) + w(wing) + w(engines) + w(payload) + w(fuel) + ...
To generalize, if we have a total of "n" discrete components, the weight of the aircraft is the sum of the individual i component weights with the index i going from 1 to n. The greek mathematical symbol sigma is used by mathematicians to denote this addition. (Sigma is a zig-zag symbol with the index designation being placed below the bottom bar, the total number of additions placed over the top bar, and the variable to be summed placed to the right of the sigma with each component designated by the index.)
W = SUM(i=1 to i=n) [wi]
This equation says that the weight of the airplane is equal to the sum of the weight of "n" discrete parts.
What if the parts are not discrete? What if we had a continuous change of mass from front to back? The continuous change can be computed using integral calculus. The sigma designation is changed to the integral "S" shaped symbol to denote a continuous variation.
W = S w(x) dx
The discrete weight is replaced with w(x) which indicates that the weight is some function of distance x. If we are given the form of the function, there are methods to solve the integration. If we don't know the actual functional form, we can still numerically integrate the equation using a spread sheet by dividing the distance up into a number of small distance segments and determining the average value of the weight over that small segment, then summing up the value.
Types of Aircraft and weights :-
MTOW = Maximum take-off weight, MLW = Maximum landing weight, TOR = Take-off run (SL, ISA+15°, MTOW), LR = Landing run (SL, ISA+15°, MLW)
| Type | MTOW [kg] | MLW [tonnes] | TOR [m] | LR [m] | ICAO category | FAA category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonov An-225 | 640,000 | 591.7 | 3500 | Heavy | Super | |
| Scaled Composites Model 351 Stratolaunch | 589,670 | 3660 | Heavy | Super | ||
| Airbus A380-800[1][2][3] | 575,000 | 394 | 3100 | 1930 | Super | Super |
| Boeing 747-8F | 447,700 | 346.091 | 3100 | 1800 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Boeing 747-8 | 443,613 | 306.175 | 3100 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Boeing 747-400ER | 412,770 | 295.742 | 3090 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Antonov An-124-100M | 405,060 | 330 | 2520 | 900 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Boeing 747-400 | 396,900 | 295.742 | 3018 | 2179 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Lockheed C-5 Galaxy[4][5][6] | 381,000 | 288.417 | 2530 | 1494 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Boeing 747-200[7] | 377,840 | 285.700 | 3338 | 2109 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Boeing 747-300[7] | 377,840 | 260.320 | 3222 | 1905 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Airbus A340-500[8] | 371,950 | 240 | 3050 | 2010 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Airbus A340-600[8] | 367,400 | 256 | 3100 | 2100 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Boeing 777F | 347,800 | 260.816 | 2830 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Airbus A330-900 | 352,000 | 251.5 | 3100 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Boeing 777-300ER | 351,800 | 251.29 | 3100 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Boeing 777-200LR | 347,450 | 223.168 | 3000 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Boeing 747-100[7] | 340,200 | 265.300 | Heavy | Heavy | ||
| Airbus A350-1000 | 308,000 | 233.5 | Heavy | Heavy | ||
| Boeing 777-300 | 299,370 | 237.683 | 3380 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Boeing 777-200ER | 297,550 | 213.00 | 3380 | 1550 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Airbus A340-300[8][9] | 276,700 | 190 | 3000 | 1926 | Heavy | Heavy |
| McDonnell Douglas MD-11 | 273,300 | 185 | 2990 | 1890 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Airbus A350-900 | 270,000 | 175 | 2670 | 1860 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Ilyushin Il-96M | 270,000 | 195.04 | 3115 | 2118 | Heavy | Heavy |
| McDonnell Douglas DC-10 | 256,280 | 183 | 2990 | 1890 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Boeing 787-9[10] | 254,000 | 192.777 | 2900 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Boeing 787-10[10] | 254,000 | 201.849 | Heavy | Heavy | ||
| Airbus A340-200[8][11] | 253,500 | 181 | 2990 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Ilyushin IL-96-300 | 250,000 | 175 | 2600 | 1980 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Airbus A330-300[12][13] | 242,000 | 185 | 2500 | 1750 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Airbus A330-200[12][13] | 242,000 | 180 | 2220 | 1750 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Lockheed L-1011-500 | 231,300 | 166.92 | 2636 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Boeing 787-8[10] | 228,000 | 172.365 | 3300 | 1695 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Lockheed L-1011-200 | 211,400 | Heavy | Heavy | |||
| Ilyushin IL-86 | 208,000 | 175 | Heavy | Heavy | ||
| Boeing 767-400ER | 204,000 | 158.758 | 3414 | Heavy | Heavy | |
| Airbus A300-600R[14] | 192,000 | 140 | 2385 | 1555 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Boeing 767-300ER | 187,000 | 136.08 | 2713 | 1676 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Concorde | 185,000 | 111.1 | 3440 | 2220 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Airbus A300-600[14] | 163,000 | 138 | 2324 | 1536 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Boeing 767-300 | 159,000 | 136.078 | 2713 | 1676 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Airbus A310-300[14] | 157,000 | 124 | 2290 | 1490 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Vickers VC10 | 152,000 | 151.9 | Heavy | Heavy | ||
| Boeing 707-320B[15] | 151,000 | 97.5 | Heavy | Heavy | ||
| Boeing 707-320C[15] | 151,000 | 112.1 | Heavy | Heavy | ||
| Douglas DC-8-61 | 147,000 | Heavy | Heavy | |||
| Airbus A310-200[14] | 142,000 | 123 | 1860 | 1480 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Airbus A400M | 141,000 | 122 | 980 | 770 | Heavy | Heavy |
| Douglas DC-8-32 | 140,000 | Heavy | Heavy | |||
| Douglas DC-8-51 | 125,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Boeing 757-300 | 124,000 | 101.6 | 2550 | 1750 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 707-120B[15] | 117,000 | 86.3 | Medium | Large | ||
| Boeing 757-200 | 116,000 | 89.9 | 2347 | 1555 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 720B[16] | 106,000 | 79.5 | Medium | Large | ||
| Boeing 720[16] | 104,000 | 79.5 | Medium | Large | ||
| Tupolev Tu-154M | 104,000 | 80 | Medium | Large | ||
| Tupolev Tu-204SM | 104,000 | 87.5 | 2250 | Medium | Large | |
| Convair 880 | 87,500 | Medium | Large | |||
| Boeing 737-900 | 85,000 | 66.36 | 2500 | 1704 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 737-900ER | 85,000 | 71.35 | 2804 | 1829 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 727-200 Advanced[17] | 84,000 | 70.1 | Medium | Large | ||
| Airbus A321-100[18] | 83,000 | 77.8 | 2200 | 1540 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 737-800 | 79,000 | 65.32 | 2308 | 1634 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 727-200[17] | 78,000 | 68.1 | Medium | Large | ||
| McDonnell-Douglas MD-83 | 73,000 | 63.28 | Medium | Large | ||
| Boeing 727-100[17] | 72,500 | 62.4 | Medium | Large | ||
| Boeing 727-100C[17] | 72,500 | 62.4 | Medium | Large | ||
| McDonnell-Douglas MD-90-30 | 71,000 | 64.41 | 2165 | 1520 | Medium | Large |
| de Havilland Comet 4 | 70,700 | Medium | Large | |||
| Boeing 737-700 | 70,000 | 58.06 | 1921 | 1415 | Medium | Large |
| Airbus A320-100[18] | 68,000 | 66 | 1955 | 1490 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 737-400 | 68,000 | 54.9 | 2540 | 1540 | Medium | Large |
| de Havilland Comet 3 | 68,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Boeing 377 | 67,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Boeing 737-600 | 66,000 | 54.66 | 1796 | 1340 | Medium | Large |
| Airbus A220-300 | 65,000 | 57.61 | 1890 | 1494 | Medium | Large |
| Hawker Siddeley Trident 2E | 65,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Airbus A319[18] | 64,000 | 62.5 | 1850 | 1470 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 737-300 | 63,000 | 51.7 | 1939 | 1396 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 737-500 | 60,000 | 49.9 | 1832 | 1360 | Medium | Large |
| Airbus A220-100 | 59,000 | 50.80 | 1463 | 1356 | Medium | Large |
| Airbus A318[18] | 59,000 | 57.5 | 1375 | 1340 | Medium | Large |
| Boeing 717-200HGW | 55,000 | 47.174 | 1950 | Medium | Large | |
| Douglas DC-7 | 55,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| de Havilland Comet 2 | 54,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Boeing 717-200BGW | 50,000 | 46.265 | 1950 | Medium | Large | |
| de Havilland Comet 1 | 50,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Douglas DC-6A | 48,600 | Medium | Large | |||
| Douglas DC-6B | 48,500 | Medium | Large | |||
| Embraer 190[19] | 48,000 | 43 | 2056 | 1323 | Medium | Large |
| Caravelle III | 46,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Fokker 100 | 46,000 | 39.95 | 1621 | 1350 | Medium | Large |
| Douglas DC-6 | 44,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Avro RJ-85 | 42,000 | 36.74 | Medium | Large | ||
| Handley Page Hermes | 39,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Embraer 175[20] | 37,500 | 32.8 | 2244 | 1304 | Medium | Large |
| Bombardier CRJ900[21] | 36,500 | 33.345 | 1778 | 1596 | Medium | Large |
| Embraer 170[22] | 36,000 | 32.8 | 1644 | 1274 | Medium | Large |
| Bombardier CRJ700 | 33,000 | 30.39 | 1564 | 1478 | Medium | Large |
| Douglas DC-4 | 33,000 | Medium | Large | |||
| Vickers Viscount 800 | 30,400 | Medium | Large | |||
| Bombardier Q400 | 28,000 | 28.01 | 1219 | 1295 | Medium | Large |
| Bombardier CRJ200 | 23,000 | 21.319 | 1918 | 1479 | Medium | Large |
| ATR 72-600 | 22,800 | 22.35 | 1333 | 914 | Medium | Large |
| Saab 2000 | 22,800 | 21.5 | 1300 | Medium | Large | |
| Embraer ERJ 145 | 22,000 | 19.3 | 2270 | 1380 | Medium | Large |
| ATR 42-500 | 18,600 | 18.3 | 1165 | 1126 | Medium | Small |
| Saab 340 | 13,150 | 12.930 | 1300 | 1030 | Medium | Small |
| Embraer 120 Brasilia | 11,500 | 11.25 | 1560 | 1380 | Medium | Small |
| BAe Jetstream 41 | 10,890 | 10.570 | 1493 | 826 | Medium | Small |
| Learjet 75[23] | 9,752 | 8.709 | 1353 | 811 | Medium | Small |
| Pilatus PC-24[24] | 8,300 | 7.665 | 893 | 724 | Medium | Small |
| Embraer Phenom 300[25] | 8,150 | 7.65 | 956 | 677 | Medium | Small |
| Beechcraft 1900D | 7,765 | 7.605 | 1036 | 853 | Medium | Small |
| Cessna Citation CJ4[26] | 7,761 | 7.103 | 1039 | 896 | Medium | Small |
| de Havilland Hercules | 7,000 | Medium | Small | |||
| Embraer Phenom 100 | 4,800 | 4.43 | 975 | 741 | Light | Small |
2. Is there any difference between ground speed and air speed?
While ground speed is the airplane’s speed relative to the surface of the Earth, airspeed – at least true airspeed – is its speed relative to the air it is flying in.
Below, I will explain the two types of speed in more detail, as well as talk about the four types of airspeed that are commonly used.
Air speed vs Ground speed :-
s mentioned above, true airspeed is simply the speed at which an aircraft is moving relative to the air it is flying in. As such, it’s also the speed at which the air is flowing around the aircraft’s wings.
Ground speed, on the other hand, is the aircraft’s speed relative to the ground. One thing that should be noted here is that it’s its horizontal rather than vertical speed – an aircraft climbing completely vertically would have a ground speed of zero.
In other words, while airspeed is what determines whether there is enough airflow around an aircraft to make it fly, ground speed is what determines how fast an aircraft will get to its destination.
Winds Effect on ground speed :-
The relationship between airspeed and ground speed is fairly simple. Ground speed is simply the sum of airspeed and wind speed.
If the aircraft is flying in the same direction as the wind is blowing, the aircraft experiences tailwind, and its ground speed is higher than its airspeed. On the other hand, if the wind is blowing against the direction the aircraft is traveling in, the aircraft experiences headwind, and its ground speed is lower than its airspeed.
To give you an actual example, imagine an aircraft that cruises at an airspeed of 500 miles per hour that has to cover a ground distance of 2,000 miles.
If there is no wind at all, then both the aircraft’s airspeed and ground speed would be the same 500 miles per hour, and the aircraft would reach its destination in four hours.
If there was a 100 miles per hour headwind – wind blowing against the aircraft’s direction of travel – the aircraft would still be traveling at an airspeed of 500 miles per hour. However, its ground speed would be just 400 miles per hour (100 miles per hour slower than its airspeed). And as such, it would take the aircraft five hours to reach its destinations.
Finally, if there was a 100 miles per hour tailwind – wind blowing in the same direction as the aircraft’s travel – the aircraft would still be traveling at an airspeed of 500 miles per hour, but its ground speed would be 100 miles faster. And, at 600 miles an hour, the aircraft would reach its destination in just three hours and twenty minutes.
The above is the reason why some flights go “out of their way” to avoid headwinds or catch tailwinds. And, why some flights might appear to be traveling at “supersonic speeds,” even though their airspeed – the speed that would actually matter in determining whether or not the flight truly is supersonic – is subsonic.
Three types of air speed :-
When I talked about airspeed earlier in this article, I was talking about true airspeed. However, pilots commonly use three different types of airspeed: indicated airspeed, calibrated airspeed, and true airspeed.
Indicated airspeed is an airspeed that is calculated directly off an aircraft’s pitot-static system. It’s the calculated off the aircraft’s dynamic pressure – the difference between its total pressure and static pressure.
Calibrated airspeed is indicated airspeed adjusted for a variety of errors.
Just as an example, one of the things it’s adjusted for is the flap position. The reason for that is that at different flap positions, air flows differently around the pitot-static system and affects the indicated airspeed readings.
True airspeed is, as has been mentioned numerous times in this article, the actual speed at which an aircraft is moving relative to the air it is traveling in. It’s calibrated airspeed adjusted for the the exact conditions (altitude, air temperature, etc.) that the aircraft is flying in.
3. Why is it not recommended to use aircraft engine power to move it on the ground at Airport?
Taxiing is the movement of an aircraft on the ground, under its own power, in contrast to towing or pushback where the aircraft is moved by a tug. The aircraft usually moves on wheels, but the term also includes aircraft with skis or floats (for water-based travel).
An airplane uses taxiways to taxi from one place on an airport to another; for example, when moving from a hangar to the runway. The term "taxiing" is not used for the accelerating run along a runway prior to takeoff, or the decelerating run immediately after landing, which are called the takeoff roll and landing rollout, respectively.
Propulsion :-
The thrust to propel the aircraft forward comes from its propellers or jet engines. Reverse thrust for backing up can be generated by thrust reversers such as on the Boeing C-17 Globemaster III, or reversible pitch propellers such as on the Lockheed C-130 Hercules, a procedure known as powerback. Most aircraft, however, are not designed to back up on their own and must be pushed back either by hand or by using an aircraft tug.
At low power settings, combustion aircraft engines operate at lower efficiency than at cruise power settings. A typical A320 spends an average of 3.5 hours a day taxiing, using 600 liters (160 U.S. gal) of fuel. Hybrid electrically driven nose gear are under development to allow high use aircraft to shut down the engines during taxi operations.
Control :-
Steering is achieved by turning a nose wheel or tail wheel/rudder; the pilot controls the direction travelled with their feet. Larger jet aircraft have a tiller wheel on the left side of the cockpit that acts as a steering wheel allowing the nosewheel to be turned hydraulically. Braking is controlled by differential toe or heel brakes. Not all aircraft have steerable wheels, and in some cases steering is solely by means of differential braking (all Van's aircraft for instance) or solely by means of the rudder (including all floatplanes)
Safety :-
When taxiing, aircraft travel slowly. This ensures that they can be stopped quickly and do not risk wheel damage on larger aircraft if they accidentally turn off the paved surface. Taxi speeds are typically 30 to 35 km/h (16 to 19 kn).
Rotor downwash limits helicopter hover-taxiing near parked light aircraft. The use of engine thrust near terminals is restricted due to the possibility of jet blast damage.
4.How an aircraft is pushed to runway when its ready to take off?
The airplane may be pushed or pulled by landing gear or wing struts since they're known to be strong enough to drag the airplane through the air. To allow for turns, a person may either pick up or push down on the tail to raise either the nose wheel or tail wheel off the ground, then rotate the airplane by hand.
Procedure :-
Pushbacks at busy aerodromes are usually subject to ground control clearance to facilitate ground movement on taxiways. Once clearance is obtained, the pilot will communicate with the tractor driver (or a ground handler walking alongside the aircraft in some cases) to start the pushback. To communicate, a headset may be connected near the nose gear.
Since the pilots cannot see what is behind the aircraft, steering is done by the pushback tractor driver and not by the pilots. Depending on the aircraft type and airline procedure, a bypass pin may be temporarily installed into the nose gear to disconnect it from the aircraft's normal steering mechanism.
Once the pushback is completed, the towbar is disconnected, and any bypass pin removed. The ground handler will show the bypass pin to the pilots to make it clear that it has been removed.The pushback is then complete, and the aircraft can taxi forward under its own power.
Ready for take-off in ten steps :-
- The pilot parks the aircraft in exactly the right place. Usually with the help of an automatic system, but occasionally guided by a marshaller waving two paddles or wands. Dozens of handling personnel are already standing by to perform a whole range of tasks simultaneously.
- As soon as the aircraft is stationary and the engines are switched off, the first priority is to disembark the passengers as quickly as possible. The apron handler places chocks in front of the wheels and connects the ground power. Meanwhile, the passenger bridge manoeuvres up to the door and a belt loader rolls up to the cargo hold. Luggage is unloaded and transferred to the terminal on baggage carts.
- Refuelling begins, usually from a hydrant at the stand. A hose is attached to this from a special vehicle called a dispenser, with the other side connected to the fuel tank in the wing. Read more about refuelling here.
- Now it is time to service the aircraft. The caterer loads new meals and takes away the food waste and used cutlery and crockery. Other activities include draining the lavatories, replacing the headrest covers, removing rubbish and distributing fresh blankets and in-flight magazine.
- A specialist team – or sometimes the crew themselves – cleans the cabin so that the new passengers board a pristine aircraft.
- Meanwhile, specialists from the airline conduct a technical check to make sure that the engines, wings, control surfaces, landing gear, instruments, doors and other equipment are in full working order.
- The aircraft is now ready for baggage to be loaded for the next flight. This is a quick process, on average taking only 10-15 minutes. A little later the passengers start boarding. As soon as they are all in their seats, the door is closed and the pilot informs air-traffic control that the flight is ready for departure.
- The apron handler removes the chocks. A so-called pushback truck reverses the aircraft into taxiing position, pushing it with a towbar attached to the nose-wheel strut. Or, in the most modern versions, by actually lifting the wheel. That speeds up coupling and decoupling.
- The aircraft taxis to the runway to depart at the agreed time.
- The pilot waits for permission to take off from air-traffic control. This is possible once the departure route is clear. As soon as the go-ahead is received, the plane takes to the air at full power.
5.Learn about take off power, tyre design, rolling resistance, tyre pressure, brake forces when landing.
Take off power :-
Takeoff is the phase of flight in which an aerospace vehicle leaves the ground and becomes airborne. For aircraft traveling vertically, this is known as liftoff.
For aircraft that take off horizontally, this usually involves starting with a transition from moving along the ground on a runway. For balloons, helicopters and some specialized fixed-wing aircraft (VTOL aircraft such as the Harrier), no runway is needed.
Vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft include fixed-wing aircraft that can hover, take off and land vertically as well as helicopters and other aircraft with powered rotors, such as tiltrotors.Some VTOL aircraft can operate in other modes as well, such as CTOL (conventional take-off and landing), STOL (short take-off and landing), and/or STOVL (short take-off and vertical landing). Others, such as some helicopters, can only operate by VTOL, due to the aircraft lacking landing gear that can handle horizontal motion. VTOL is a subset of V/STOL (vertical and/or short take-off and landing).
Besides the helicopter, there are two types of VTOL aircraft in military service: craft using a tiltrotor, such as the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, and some aircraft using directed jet thrust such as the Harrier family.
Assisted takeoff is any system for helping aircraft into the air (as opposed to strictly under its own power). The reason it might be needed is due to the aircraft's weight exceeding the normal maximum takeoff weight, insufficient power, or the available runway length may be insufficient, or a hot and high airfield, or a combination of all four factors. Assisted takeoff is also required for gliders, which do not have an engine and so are unable to take off by themselves.
Air craft tyres :-
An aircraft tire or tyre is designed to withstand extremely heavy loads for short durations.The number of tires required for aircraft increases with the weight of the aircraft, as the weight of the airplane needs to be distributed more evenly. Aircraft tire tread patterns are designed to facilitate stability in high crosswind conditions, to channel water away to prevent hydroplaning, and for braking effect.
Aircraft tires also include fusible plugs (which are assembled on the inside of the wheels), designed to melt at a certain temperature. Tires often overheat if maximum braking is applied during an aborted takeoff or an emergency landing. The fuses provide a safer failure mode that prevents tire explosions by deflating in a controlled manner, thus minimizing damage to aircraft and objects in the surrounding environment.
Design and construction of Aircraft tyre :-
Carcass plies are used to form the tire. They are sometimes called casing plies. An aircraft tyre is constructed for the purpose it serves.
- They support the weight of an aircraft while it is on the ground.
- It also provides the necessary traction for braking and stopping of an aeroplane.
- Tyre also helps to absorb the shock of landing and provide cushioning the roughness of takeoff, roll-out, and taxi operations.
Unlike an automobile or truck tyre, it does not have to carry a load for a long period of continuous operation. However, an aircraft tyre absorbs the high impact loads of landing, and also it’s operating at high speeds for a short time when required.
Rolling resistence :-
In the broad sense, specific "rolling resistance" (for vehicles) is the force per unit vehicle weight required to move the vehicle on level ground at a constant slow speed where aerodynamic drag (air resistance) is insignificant and also where there are no traction (motor) forces or brakes applied.
Aircraft tyre pressure :-
An aircraft tire or tyre is designed to withstand extremely heavy loads for short durations.The number of tires required for aircraft increases with the weight of the aircraft, as the weight of the airplane needs to be distributed more evenly. Aircraft tire tread patterns are designed to facilitate stability in high crosswind conditions, to channel water away to prevent hydroplaning, and for braking effect.
Aircraft tires also include fusible plugs (which are assembled on the inside of the wheels), designed to melt at a certain temperature. Tires often overheat if maximum braking is applied during an aborted takeoff or an emergency landing. The fuses provide a safer failure mode that prevents tire explosions by deflating in a controlled manner, thus minimizing damage to aircraft and objects in the surrounding environment.
Aircraft tires generally operate at high pressures, up to 200 psi (14 bar; 1,400 kPa) for airliners, and even higher for business jets. The main landing gear on the Concorde was typically inflated to 232 psi (16.0 bar), whilst its tail bumper gear tires were as high as 294 psi (20.3 bar).The high pressure and weight load on the Concorde tyres were a significant factor in the loss of Air France Flight 4590.
Tests of airliner aircraft tires have shown that they are able to sustain pressures of maximum 800 psi (55 bar; 5,500 kPa) before bursting. During the tests the tires have to be filled with water, to prevent the test room being blown apart by the energy that would be released by a gas when the tire bursts.
Aircraft tires are usually inflated with nitrogen to minimize expansion and contraction from extreme changes in ambient temperature and pressure experienced during flight. Dry nitrogen expands at the same rate as other dry atmospheric gases (normal air is about 80% nitrogen), but common compressed air sources may contain moisture, which increases the expansion rate with temperature.
The requirement that an inert gas, such as nitrogen, be used instead of air for inflation of tires on certain transport category airplanes was prompted by at least three cases in which the oxygen in air-filled tires had combined with volatile gases given off by a severely overheated tire and exploded upon reaching autoignition temperature. The use of an inert gas for tire inflation eliminates the possibility of tire explosion.

Breaking force when landing :-
In general, when the wheels touch the ground, a set of spoilers raise up quickly, which kills the lift provided by the wings.Before landing, when the landing gear is lowered, the pilots arm the ground spoilers to deploy automatically on touchdown. This lever controls the speed brakes, or ground spoilers.


- Aircraft disc brakes in the landing gear, used to brake the wheels while touching the ground. These brakes are operated hydraulically or pneumatically. In most modern aircraft they are activated by the top section of the rudder pedals ("toe brakes"). In some older aircraft the bottom section is used instead ("heel brakes"). Levers are used in a few aircraft. Most aircraft are capable of differential braking.
- Thrust reversers, that allow thrust from the engines to be used to slow the aircraft.
- Air brakes, dedicated flight control surfaces that work by increasing drag.
- Large drogue parachutes, used by several former and current military and civilian aircraft (examples include the American B-52 and the soviet Tu-134 and Tu-144) and in the Space Shuttle.
6. A. With necessary assumptions, calculate the force and power required to push / pull an aircraft by a towing vehicle.
There are three forces acting in towing vehicle
- Areodynamic force
- hill climbing force
- rolling resistence force
Let assume,
vehicle mass = 55000 kg
air craft mass = 187700 kg
Total mass = (55000 + 187700) = 242700 kg
speed of vehicle (V) = 10km/h = 2.77 m/s
Rolling resistence force,
frr = urr*m*g
= 0.013*242700*9.8
= 30919.98 N
Aerodynamic force,
Fad = (1/2)*p*v^2*a*(cdt +cda)
= (1/2)*1.225*(2.778)^2*20*(0.5 +0.045)
= 51.514 N
hill climbing force,
fhc = m*g*sin`emptyset`
= 242700*9.8*sin`emptyset`
= 0 N
Total traction force,
fte = frr + fad + fhc
`nbsp; `= 30971.501`N
total power = fte*v/1000
= 85.79 KW
B. Develop the model for the calculated force and power using Simulink.

7. A. Design an electric powertrain with type of motor, it’s power rating, and energy requirement to fulfill aircraft towing application in Simulink. Estimate the duty cycle range to control the aircraft speed from zero to highest. Make all required assumptions. Prepare a table of assumed parameters. Draw a block diagram of powertrain.
Power train design assumption :-
Aircraft mass - 187700 kg
towing vehicle mass - 55000 kg
rolling resistence co-efficient - 0.013
air density - 1.225 kg/m^3
towing vehicle drag coefficient - 0.5
air drag co efficient - 0.045
frontal area - 20m^2
inclination angle - 0rad
tyre pressure - 203PSi/14bar
towing velocity - 2.7 m/s
towing time - 3min
radius of towing vehicle wheel - 0.38m
We know the traction force and power from the above calculation
we want to konw torque T = force * wheel radius
= 30971.501 * 0.38
= 11769.17 Nm
Required energy for towing application E = p*t
= 85.79*(120/3600)
= 2.859 KWH
Application for induction motor BLDC
ouput power = 95kw
Duty cycle = output power/input power
= 85.79/95*100
= 90 %
The control of air craft speed from zero to highest is from 0% to 90%
Block diagram :-

B. Also, Design the parameters in excel sheet.

