Challenge

Identification of Cracks

(a)

ans:-

  • Its Form of Flexural failure due to reversal of stress during earthquake.

During stress reversal ,support top experiences compression and bottom experiences tension.

  • Top compression is managed by slab advantage .bottom tension was not satisfied by provided reinforcement.
  • since the reinforcement got yielded,it can not be repaired.

(b)

ans:-

  • It Beam pull out failure due to insufficient development length of reinforcement in joints.
  • During Earthquake, the horizontal movement of structure makes the condition worse and detached the beam member from column.
  • Providing anchorage length between two existing concrete is very difficult .So not repairable.

(c)

ans:-

  • It's a plastic hinge failure'
  • The damage occurred only in the joint zone first of all'
  • cyclic lateral loading &stress reversal at the joints led to the damage.
  • Even the slab participated to its best to handle the tension but unable to control the damage'
  • The joint can be Strengthened.

2

(a)

ans:-

  • It's a soft storey failure ,Technicaally Plastic Hinge Formation .
  • Due to absence of infill walls at the Ground floor ,the Plastic hinge forms at the top of ground Storey columns During Lateral Movement.
  • Based on the development of crush of concrete it can Either be repairable Or Non-repairable.

(b)

ans:-

  • It's a pure Shear failure.
  • Inadequate shear reinforcement compels concrete takes all the shear stresses.

(c)

ans:-

  • It's a short Column Failure
  • An additional Slab Or a Beam Connected to a Column In mid-height leads to this effect.
  • The leads to failure especially if the connection is unintentional and not accounted in design.
  • The failure Given in the picture is not at all repairable.

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.