Challenge

Identification of Cracks

1(a) ans :-

  • Its from of flexural failure due to reversal of stress during earthquake.
  • During stress reversal , support top experiences compressions and bottom experience tension
  • Top compression is managed by slab advantages, bottom tension was not satisfied by the provided reinforcement.
  • Since the reinforcement got yeilded, it can not be repaired.

1(b) ans:-

  • Its beam pull out failure due to insufficient development length of reinforcement in joints.
  • During earthquake, the horizontal movement of structure makes this condition worse and detached the beam member from column.
  • Providing anchorage length between two existing concrete is very difficult so not repairable.

1(c) ans:-

  • Its a plastic hinge failure.
  • The damage occured onlyt in the jopint zone first of all
  • Cyclic lateral loading and stress reversal at the joints led to the damaged
  • The joint can be strengthened.

2(a) ans :-

  • Its a soft storey failure , technically plastic hinge formation.
  • Due to absence of infill walls at the ground floor, the plastic hinge forms at the top of the ground storey columns durinmg lateral movements.
  • Based on the development of crush of concrete it can either be repairable or non-repairable.

2(b) ans:-

  • Its a pure shear failure
  • In adqeuate shear reinforcement compels concrete takes all the shear stresses.

2(c) ans:-

  • Its a short column failure
  • An additional beam connected to a column in mid height leads to this effect
  • This leadds to failure especially if the connection is unintentional and not accounted in design
  • The failre given in the picture is not at all repairable.
Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.