Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis on a graphics card.
Aim:
- To perform a steady state conjugate heat transfer analysis on a model of Graphic card and to find the maximum heat transfer coeffecient and maximum temperature attained.
- To vary the inlet velocity, and to measure the maximum temperture and Heat Transfer Coeffecient
Procedure
Spaceclaim:
- The CAD model of the graphic card is first imported into the space claim environment
- The given CAD model is layered and an enclosure is provided.
- It is made sure that , the topology is shared between the various parts
Meshing:
- The geometry from the space claim is then imported into the meshing interface.
- First a base level mesh is created.
- The base level mesh is checked for conformance.
- Further refininf is done based on the required mesh size.
- The enclosure is given a body sizing with element size 3mm. A mildy coarse mesh is used for enclosure inorder to keep the maximum cell count within range.
- The processor is given a body sizing with element size 0.5mm .A fine mesh is use because the source of heat is from the processor.
- The Fins are given a body sizing of 0.8mm. This is mainly beacause, the fins are the heat transfer element, which transfers heat from the processor to the surrounding.
- The base is given a element size of 3mm. This is given as a coarse mesh, the material to be use has a low HTC
Fluent:
- The mesh is then imported into fluent.
- The viscous model used in k-Epsilon model with realizable wall function.
- The energy is turned on, since this is a comjugate heat analysis problem
- The materials used for different components are as follows
| Material | Component | Density `((kg)/m^3)` | Cp `(J/(kg.K))` |
Thermal Conductivity `(w/(m.K))` |
| Gold | Processor | 19320 | 129.8 | 297.73 |
| ABS | Base Plate | 1050 | 1390 | 0.25 |
| Copper | Fins | 8978 | 381 | 387.6 |
- The Heat source was given under the processor cell zone, considering the volume of the GPU being very small 64 mm^3, we take the power consumption of the GPU to be 5W. So Heat generated = 781250000 `W/m^3`
Case 1 :
The inlet velocity is considered to be 5m/s
Temperature Contour of PCB at 5m/s
Temperature Contour of Fins at 5m/s
Velocity Contour for 5 m/s
Wall heat Transfer Coeffecient
Temperature plot to find that , the solution is converged.
Case 2 :
The inlet velocity is considered to be 1m/s
Temperature contour for PCB at 1m/s
Temperature contour for Fins at 1m/s
Velocity Contour
Wall heat transfer coeffecient
Temperature plot to find that , the solution is converged.
Result :
From the simulation, we can see that, the heat transfer coeffecient is high when inlet velocity is 5 m/s. This enables higher heat transfer. Hence, the maximum temperature is low at 5 m/s when compared with 1 m/s
This is becasue as the velocity increases, the flow converts from a laminar flow to turbulent flow. At higher velocity, the mixing takes place more effectively, thereby increasing the heat transfer coeffecient.
| Inlet Velocity (m/s) | Heat Transfer Coeff`(W/(m^2K)` | Maximum Temperature(°C) |
| 5 | 1108 | 348 |
| 1 | 544 | 424 |