Phil Dias Backward Facing Step
Introduction:
This project simulated flow through a backward facing step using icoFOAM using the software OpenFOAM. This simulation resulted velocity and pressure profiles for three different mesh grading factors (MGF). The three MGFs are 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8. This project required 200 cells along the x-direction and 10 cells along the y-direction.The nature of the flow is incompressible. Five individual blocks were used to create the specified geometry.
Geometry of the backward facing step:
OpenFOAM Code:
Block Mesh:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\\
========= |
\\\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\\\ / A nd | Version: 7
\\\\/ M anipulation |
\\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
object blockMeshDict;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
convertToMeters 1;
vertices
(
(0 0 0) //0
(0.08 0 0) //1
(0.08 0.005 0) //2
(0 0.005 0) //3
(0.08 0.01 0) //4
(0 0.01 0) //5
(0.2 0.01 0) //6
(0.2 0.005 0) //7
(0.2 0 0) //8
(0.2 -0.01 0) //9
(0.08 -0.01 0) //10
(0 0 0.001) //11
(0.08 0 0.001) //12
(0.08 0.005 0.001) //13
(0 0.005 0.001) //14
(0.08 0.01 0.001) //15
(0 0.01 0.001) //16
(0.2 0.01 0.001) //17
(0.2 0.005 0.001) //18
(0.2 0 0.001) //19
(0.2 -0.01 0.001) //20
(0.08 -0.01 0.001) //21
);
blocks
(
hex (0 1 2 3 11 12 13 14) (80 5 1) simpleGrading (0.2 5 1)
hex (3 2 4 5 14 13 15 16) (80 5 1) simpleGrading (0.2 0.2 1)
hex (2 7 6 4 13 18 17 15) (120 5 1) simpleGrading (5 0.2 1)
hex (1 8 7 2 12 19 18 13) (120 5 1) simpleGrading (5 5 1)
hex (10 9 8 1 21 20 19 12) (120 10 1) simpleGrading (5 5 1)
);
edges
(
);
boundary
(
inlet
{
type patch;
faces
(
(0 11 14 3)
(3 14 16 5)
);
}
outlet
{
type wall;
faces
(
(9 8 19 20)
(8 7 18 19)
(7 6 17 18)
);
}
upperwalls
{
type wall;
faces
(
(5 16 15 4)
(4 15 17 6)
);
}
lowerwalls
{
type wall;
faces
(
(0 1 12 11)
(10 21 12 1)
(10 9 20 21)
);
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
faces
(
(3 2 1 0)
(5 4 2 3)
(4 6 7 2)
(2 7 8 1)
(1 8 9 10)
(11 12 13 14)
(14 13 15 16)
(13 18 17 15)
(12 19 18 13)
(21 20 19 12)
);
}
);
mergePatchPairs
(
);
// ************************************************************************* //Boundary Conditions:
Velocity Conditions:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\\
========= |
\\\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\\\ / A nd | Version: 7
\\\\/ M anipulation |
\\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volVectorField;
object U;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
dimensions [0 1 -1 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform (0 0 0);
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (1 0 0);
}
outlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}
upperwalls
{
type noSlip;
}
lowerwalls
{
type noSlip;
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
}
// ************************************************************************* //Pressure Conditions:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\\
========= |
\\\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\\\ / A nd | Version: 7
\\\\/ M anipulation |
\\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class volScalarField;
object p;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0];
internalField uniform 0;
boundaryField
{
inlet
{
type zeroGradient;
}
outlet
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 0;
}
upperwalls
{
type zeroGradient;
}
lowerwalls
{
type zeroGradient;
}
frontAndBack
{
type empty;
}
}
// ************************************************************************* //Kinematic Viscosity:
Air -- `= 1.48e-5 (m^2)/(s)`
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\\
========= |
\\\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\\\ / A nd | Version: 7
\\\\/ M anipulation |
\\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
location \"constant\";
object transportProperties;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
nu [0 2 -1 0 0 0 0] 1.48e-5;
// ************************************************************************* //Time Step:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\\
========= |
\\\\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
\\\\ / O peration | Website: https://openfoam.org
\\\\ / A nd | Version: 7
\\\\/ M anipulation |
\\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
location \"system\";
object controlDict;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
application icoFoam;
startFrom startTime;
startTime 0;
stopAt endTime;
endTime 0.5;
deltaT 0.0005;
writeControl timeStep;
writeInterval 20;
purgeWrite 0;
writeFormat ascii;
writePrecision 6;
writeCompression off;
timeFormat general;
timePrecision 6;
runTimeModifiable true;
// ************************************************************************* //Mesh Grading Factor (MGF) :
In this project MGFs of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 were tested.
Results:
MGF 0.2:
https://youtu.be/sXl7BaCcruU
MGF 0.5:
https://youtu.be/CL9IzrzCm-o
MGF 0.8:
https://youtu.be/dZ-XHpVurWM
Conclusion:
MGF is used in this project to calculate flow quantities at a desired location. Increasing the MGF allowed the graph to be smoother. However; in this project I did not see a significant difference in the smoothness of the curves by switching the MGF.