Project

|| Powertrain Of An Aircraft's Towing Vehicle ||

1.

The Total weights of an Aircraft are listed below:

Type

MTOW [kg]

MLW [tons]

Antonov An-225

640,000

591.7

Scaled Composites Model 351 Stratolaunch

589,670

Airbus A380-800

575,000

394

Boeing 747-8F

447,700

346.091

Boeing 747-8

443,613

306.175

Boeing 747-400ER

412,770

295.742

Antonov An-124-100M

405,060

330

Boeing 747-400

396,900

295.742

Lockheed C-5 Galaxy

381,000

288.417

Boeing 747-200

377,840

285.700

Boeing 747-300

377,840

260.320

Airbus A340-500

371,950

240

Airbus A340-600

367,400

256

Boeing 777-300ER

351,800

251.29

Boeing 777F

347,800

260.816

Boeing 777-200LR

347,450

223.168

Boeing 747-100

340,200

265.300

Airbus A350-1000

308,000

233.5

Boeing 777-300

299,370

237.683

Boeing 777-200ER

297,550

213.00

Airbus A340-300

276,700

190

McDonnell Douglas MD-11

273,300

185

Airbus A350-900

270,000

175

Ilyushin Il-96M

270,000

195.04

McDonnell Douglas DC-10

256,280

183

Boeing 787-9

254,000

192.777

Boeing 787-10

254,000

201.849

Airbus A340-200

253,500

181

Ilyushin IL-96-300

250,000

175

Airbus A330-300

242,000

185

Airbus A330-200

242,000

180

Lockheed L-1011-500

231,300

166.92

Boeing 787-8

228,000

172.365

Lockheed L-1011-200

211,400

Ilyushin IL-86

208,000

175

Boeing 767-400ER

204,000

158.758

Airbus A300-600R

192,000

140

Boeing 767-300ER

187,000

136.08

Concorde

185,000

111.1

Airbus A300-600

163,000

138

Boeing 767-300

159,000

136.078

Airbus A310-300

157,000

124

Vickers VC10

152,000

151.9

Boeing 707-320B

151,000

97.5

Boeing 707-320C

151,000

112.1

Douglas DC-8-61

147,000

Airbus A310-200

142,000

123

Airbus A400M

141,000

122

Douglas DC-8-32

140,000

Douglas DC-8-51

125,000

Boeing 757-300

124,000

101.6

Boeing 707-120B

117,000

86.3

Boeing 757-200

116,000

89.9

Boeing 720B

106,000

79.5

Boeing 720

104,000

79.5

Tupolev Tu-154M

104,000

80

Tupolev Tu-204SM

104,000

87.5

Convair 880

87,500

Boeing 737-900

85,000

66.36

Boeing 737-900ER

85,000

71.35

Boeing 727-200 Advanced

84,000

70.1

Airbus A321-100

83,000

77.8

Boeing 737-800

79,000

65.32

Boeing 727-200

78,000

68.1

McDonnell-Douglas MD-83

73,000

63.28

Boeing 727-100

72,500

62.4

Boeing 727-100C

72,500

62.4

McDonnell-Douglas MD-90-30

71,000

64.41

de Havilland Comet 4

70,700

Boeing 737-700

70,000

58.06

Airbus A320-100

68,000

66

Boeing 737-400

68,000

54.9

de Havilland Comet 3

68,000

Boeing 377

67,000

Boeing 737-600

66,000

54.66

Airbus A220-300

65,000

57.61

Hawker Siddeley Trident 2E

65,000

Airbus A319

64,000

62.5

Boeing 737-300

63,000

51.7

Boeing 737-500

60,000

49.9

Airbus A220-100

59,000

50.80

Airbus A318

59,000

57.5

Boeing 717-200HGW

55,000

47.174

Douglas DC-7

55,000

de Havilland Comet 2

54,000

Boeing 717-200BGW

50,000

46.265

de Havilland Comet 1

50,000

Douglas DC-6A

48,600

Douglas DC-6B

48,500

Embraer 190

48,000

43

Caravelle III

46,000

Fokker 100

46,000

39.95

Douglas DC-6

44,000

Avro RJ-85

42,000

36.74

Handley Page Hermes

39,000

Embraer 175

37,500

32.8

Bombardier CRJ900

36,500

33.345

Embraer 170

36,000

32.8

Bombardier CRJ700

33,000

30.39

Douglas DC-4

33,000

Vickers Viscount 800

30,400

Bombardier Q400

28,000

28.01

Bombardier CRJ200

23,000

21.319

ATR 72-600

22,800

22.35

Saab 2000

22,800

21.5

Embraer ERJ 145

22,000

19.3

ATR 42-500

18,600

18.3

Saab 340

13,150

12.930

Embraer 120 Brasilia

11,500

11.25

BAe Jetstream 41

10,890

10.570

Learjet 75

9,752

8.709

Pilatus PC-24

8,300

7.665

Embraer Phenom 300

8,150

7.65

Beechcraft 1900D

7,765

7.605

Cessna Citation CJ4

7,761

7.103

de Havilland Hercules

7,000

Embraer Phenom 100

4,800

4.43

Where,

MTOW = Maximum take-off weight

MLW = Maximum landing weight

Determination Of The Weights:-

The wings, engine, fuselage, and tail, plus the payload and the fuel. Each part has a weight associated with it which the engineer can estimate, or calculate, using Newton's weight equation:

w = m * g

where w is the weight, m is the mass, and g is the gravitational constant which is 9.8 meters/square sec in metric units. The mass of an individual component can be calculated if we know the size of the component and its chemical composition. Every material (iron, plastic, aluminum, gasoline, etc.) has a unique density. Density r is defined to be the mass divided by the volume v:

r = m / v

If we can calculate the volume

m = r * v

The total weight W of the aircraft is simply the sum of the weight of all of the individual components.

W = w(fuselage) + w(wing) + w(engines) + w(payload) + w(fuel) + ...

2.

Yes, there is a difference between ground speed and the wind speed, And the difference is known as air speed.

To Understand it more clearly, let us understand each term. That is, Wind speed, Air speed, and ground speed.

One of the most confusing concepts for young scientists is the relative velocity between objects. Aerodynamic forces are generated by an object moving through a fluid (liquid or gas). A fixed object in a static fluid does not generate aerodynamic forces. Hot air balloons "lift" because of buoyancy forces and some aircraft like the Harrier use thrust to "lift" the vehicle, but these are not examples of aerodynamic lift. To generate lift, an object must move through the air, or air must move past the object. Aerodynamic lift depends on the square of the velocity between the object and the air. Now things get confusing because not only can the object be moved through the air, but the air itself can move. To properly define the relative velocity, it is necessary to pick a fixed reference point and measure velocities relative to the fixed point. In this slide, the reference point is fixed to the ground, but it could just as easily be fixed to the aircraft itself. It is important to understand the relationships of wind speed to ground speed and airspeed.

Wind Speed

For a reference point picked on the ground, the air moves relative to the reference point at the wind speed. Notice that the wind speed is a vector quantity and has both a magnitude and a direction. Direction is important. A 20 mph wind from the west is different from a 20 mph wind from the east. The wind has components in all three primary directions (north-south, east-west, and up-down). In this figure, we are considering only velocities along the aircraft's flight path. A positive velocity is defined to be in the direction of the aircraft's motion. We are neglecting cross winds, which occur perpendicular to the flight path but parallel to the ground, and updrafts and downdrafts, which occur perpendicular to the ground.

Ground Speed

For a reference point picked on the ground, the aircraft moves relative to the reference point at the ground speed. Ground speed is also a vector quantity so a comparison of the ground speed to the wind speed must be done according to rules for vector comparisions.

Airspeed

The important quantity in the generation of lift is the relative velocity between the object and the air, which is called the airspeed. Airspeed cannot be directly measured from a ground position, but must be computed from the ground speed and the wind speed. Airspeed is the vector difference between the ground speed and the wind speed.

Airspeed = Ground Speed - Wind Speed

On a perfectly still day, the airspeed is equal to the ground speed. But if the wind is blowing in the same direction that the aircraft is moving, the airspeed will be less than the ground speed.

To Visualize more precisely, Animation by NASA make it more clear. Below is the link.

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/Animation/airrel/anrelw.html

3.

It is not recommended to use aircraft engine power to move it on the ground at Airport due to the following three reasons:

1. Noise

2. Engine wear

3. Cost

1. Noise :

Airplane engines and the Auxiliary Power Unit contribute so much noise near an airport that every shut-downed engine helps. The Sound from the air plane varies in the range of 80 to 140 dB. As a passenger we can't really hear the difference if one of the engines has been shut down during taxi. But, it sure makes the difference for the nearby residential areas and the ground crews. As the airplane approaches the gate position.
2.Engine Wear:
The reduction in engine wear is minor as the engine is only shut down for a few minutes after landing and on most planes you can only shut down one specific engine due to the system layout of the plane. Maintenance reports state that a lot of the engines get damaged due to bits of gravel being sucked up during taxi or so-called "FOD"(Foreign Object Damage). So, shutting down an engine earlier reduces the risk of potential FOD damage.
Fig.1 Engine wear Due to FOD
3. Cost:
Last, But not the least reason as every so often is fuel saving. Example, A Boeing 737-800 burns approximately 300 kilos of fuel per hour with engines running at idle power. Now, let's say that we just landed and are stuck in inbound taxiing traffic for thirty minutes. We could cut engine number two and we could save 75 kilograms of fuel that equals two petrol tanks of a standard size car. Now, let's use Alaska Airlines as an example. They have 160 Boeing 737s in their fleet. Now, let's say each have an average taxi time of fifteen minutes with one engine shut down equals 37.5 kilograms of fuel times 160 planes equals six tons. But, each plane performs at least two flights per day, so the total fuel saved would be twelve tons. That's a lot of fuel for one day, multiply that by 365 days per year,
and we are saving a LOT of money.
4.

In aviation, pushback is an airport procedure during which an aircraft is pushed backwards away from an airport gate by an external power. Pushbacks are carried out by special, low-profile vehicles called pushback tractors or tugs.

Image 1: Pushback of an airplane by a pushback tractor or tugs

Although, many aircraft are capable of moving themselves backwards on the ground using reverse thrust (a procedure referred to as a powerback), the resulting jetblast or prop wash might cause damage to the terminal building or equipment. Engines close to the ground may also blow sand and debris forward and then suck them into the engine, causing damage to the engine. A pushback is therefore the preferred method to move the aircraft away from the gate.

PROCEDURE:

Pushbacks at busy aerodromes are usually subject to ground control clearance to facilitate ground movement on taxiways. Once clearance is obtained, the pilot will communicate with the tractor driver (or a ground handler walking alongside the aircraft in some cases) to start the pushback. To communicate, a headset may be connected near the nose gear.

Since the pilots cannot see what is behind the aircraft, steering is done by the pushback tractor driver and not by the pilots. Depending on the aircraft type and airline procedure, a bypass pin may be temporarily installed into the nose gear to disconnect it from the aircraft's normal steering mechanism.

Once the pushback is completed, the towbar is disconnected, and any bypass pin removed. The ground handler will show the bypass pin to the pilots to make it clear that it has been removed. The pushback is then complete, and the aircraft can taxi forward under its own power.

Airbus A380, pushback is shown in the Link

Link: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6f/Airbus-A380-Pushback-001.ogv

5.

  • Take-Off Power:

Takeoff is the phase of flight in which an aerospace vehicle leaves the ground and becomes airborne.

For aircraft that take off horizontally, this usually involves starting with a transition from moving along the ground on a runway. For balloons, helicopters and some specialized fixed-wing aircraft (VTOL aircraft such as the Harrier), no runway is needed. Takeoff is the opposite of landing.

The total energy of an aircraft flying in the atmosphere can be calculated using equation.

E = ½ m v2 + mgh

Taking an example of Boeing 737-300,

A Boeing 737-300 has a maximum takeoff weight of 5.65 × 104 kg, a cruise altitude of h = 10,195 m, and cruise speed of 221 m/sec. Inserting these numbers into the above equation, we obtain 7.03 GJ for the energy at cruise conditions. [3] However, the engines mounted onto the wings of the plane are required to provide additional energy per time, power, in order to keep the aircraft flying at a constant altitude and speed. This extra power needed to overcome the drag acting on the airplane and is calculated using

P = (dh/dt) * m * g

where (dh/dt) is the decent speed required to keep the plane's speed constant if the engines fail. Assuming that a Boeing 737-300 has a similar glide ratio to a Boeing 747 of 17:1, a Boeing 737-300 has a descent speed of approximately (dh/dt)= (221m/sec)/17 = 13 m/sec. The power required to keep a Boeing 737-300 flying at a constant altitude and speed is 7.2 × 106 watts. The rate of fuel burn necessary for the engines to produce enough power to keep the airplane flying can be calculated from the total power requirement. Assuming the efficiency of the engines adding thrust to the aircraft is roughly 30% and the specific gravity of jet fuel is about 0.82 kg per liter, a Boeing 737-300 burns approximately 0.665 liters per second. A Boeing 737-300 has a standard fuel capacity of 2.0104 × 104 liters. Assuming that takeoff, climb, and landing burns approximately one third of the total fuel, and at cruise conditions with a fuel burn rate of 0.665 liters per second, a Boeing 737-300 can fly for approximately (2/3) × 8.4 hours= 5.6 hours at cruise conditions before running out of jet fuel.

  • Tyre Design:

An aircraft tire or tyre is designed to withstand extremely heavy loads for short durations. The number of tires required for aircraft increases with the weight of the aircraft, as the weight of the airplane needs to be distributed more evenly. Aircraft tire tread patterns are designed to facilitate stability in high crosswind conditions, to channel water away to prevent hydroplaning, and for braking effect.

Aircraft tires also include fusible plugs (which are assembled on the inside of the wheels), designed to melt at a certain temperature. Tires often overheat if maximum braking is applied during an aborted takeoff or an emergency landing. The fuses provide a safer failure mode that prevents tire explosions by deflating in a controlled manner, thus minimizing damage to aircraft and objects in the surrounding environment.

Diagram: Construction of an aircraft tire

Some technical aspects which should be taken care while designing the tyre:

Retreading – Retreading is methods of restoring a worn tyre by renewing the tread area or by renewing the tread area plus one or both sidewalls. Repairs are included in the tyre retreading process.

Load Rating – Load rating is the maximum permissible load at a specified inflation pressure.

Ply Rating – Ply Rating is used to identify the maximum recommended load rating and inflation pressure for a specified tyre. It is an index of tyre strength.

Speed Rating – The speed rating is the maximum takeoff speed to which the tyre has been tested.

Skid Depth – Skid depth is the distance between the tread surface and the deepest groove as measured in the mould.

  • Rolling resistance:

Rolling resistance, sometimes called rolling friction or rolling drag, is the force resisting the motion when a body rolls on a surface. It is mainly caused by non-elastic effects; that is, not all the energy needed for deformation of the wheel, roadbed, etc., is recovered when the pressure is removed.

The "rolling resistance coefficient" is defined by the following equation:

F=μrr⋅N">F=μrr⋅NF=μrr⋅N

        where,
F">FF is the rolling resistance force
μrr">μrrμrris the dimensionless rolling resistance coefficient or coefficient of rolling friction (CRF), and
N">NNis the normal force, the force perpendicular to the surface on which the wheel is rolling or the normal force (equal to W)
  • Tyre Pressure:

Aircraft tires generally operate at high pressures, up to 200 psi (14 bar; 1,400 kPa) for airliners, and even higher for business jets. The main landing gear on the concrode was typically inflated to 232 psi (16.0 bar), whilst its tail bumper gear tires were as high as 294 psi (20.3 bar). The high pressure and weight load on the Concorde tyres were a significant factor in the loss of Airplanes.

  • Braking Forces Acting During Landing:

In the initial landing phase, when the object is approaching the runway, there are aerodynamic forces and moments acting on it as well as the gravitational force. In this situation, the object is the aircraft with its own motion laws. But as soon as the object’s wheels touch the runway, there appears a new force acting on this object while other forces are changing. The wheel force of friction starts to act on the object; the aerodynamic forces start to decrease. The wheel friction force depends on the magnitude of aerodynamic lift (in respect to the weight of the object). The more time the object moves on the runway, the smaller the aerodynamic lift and the greater the wheel friction force. The aircraft in its kinematic behavior turns into a ground transport vehicle. The object’s longitudinal motion in the aircraft phase is described in accordance with Newton's law:

6.

The force to move an air plane on an absolute flat runway with no wind at constant low speed is equal to the rolling resistance between the plane and the tug.

The rolling resistance for the air plane can be calculated as:

Fr=μrr⋅mr⋅g">Fr=μrr⋅mr⋅gFr=μrr⋅mr⋅g

where

Fr = Force (N)

c = rolling resistance coefficient

mr = rolling mass (kg)

g = acceleration of gravity (9.81 m/s2)

Force required to pull an air plane at constant low speed

Assuming,

The mass of the AirPlane as 7000kg

Which is a very light jets on down to virtually all piston engined aircraft and single engined turboprops.

Rolling Resistance Coefficent = 0.02

Then,

F_r = 0.02*7000*9.81

F_r = 1374 N

This is the force that can be delivered by a pulling truck.

The friction force for the puller can be calculated to

Ff = μ W

= μ mf ag

where,

Ff = frictional force (N)

μ = friction coefficient

W = Weight (N)

mf = friction mass (kg)

taking, value of μ = 0.9

then,

m_f = (1374N) / (0.9 (9.81 m/s2))

m_f = 156 kg

With a more realistic bending angle 60o - the minimum vertical force or weight can be calculated as

W = tan(60o) * 1374

W= 2380 N

Then, the mass of the puller could be,

m_f1 = W/g

=2380/9.81

= 243 kg

Taking, radius of the wheel as 0.25m

Now, Calculating Torque (T) = F*R

then, T = 1374*0.25

T = 344 N-m

So,

Power(P) = F*V

Taking V = 6 kph (including load)

i.e., V = 1.66 m/s

then,

P = 1374*1.66

P = 2.3 Kw

7.

Fig. 1. Basic Powertrain of an EV

By, the powertrain diagram. We can say, that output of the converter/ controller is the input of the motor

According to the previous Solution, We got the power consumption of the towing vehicle as 2.3 Kw

We know that,

By Electric Power Equation,

By the equation for electric power:

Vo⋅Io=η⋅Vi⋅Ii">Vo⋅Io=η⋅Vi⋅IiVo⋅Io=η⋅Vi⋅Ii

where,

Vo is the output voltage

Io is the output current

η is the power efficiency (ranging from 0 to 1)

Vi is the input voltage

Ii is the input current

Here,

Considering, DC input voltage,

Vi">ViVi = 36V

and, Pi=2.5">Pi=2.5Pi=2.5KW

then,

Pi=Vi⋅Ii">Pi=Vi⋅IiPi=Vi⋅Ii

250036=Ii">250036=Ii250036=Ii

Ii=70Amps.">Ii=70Amps.Ii=70Amps.

So, Efficiency of the Buck Converter will be,

ηb=PoPi">ηb=PoPiηb=PoPi

ηb=23002500">ηb=23002500ηb=23002500

ηb=0.92">ηb=0.92ηb=0.92

Now, From the Equation

Vo⋅70=0.92⋅36⋅70">Vo⋅70=0.92⋅36⋅70Vo⋅70=0.92⋅36⋅70 (Ii=Io">Ii=IoIi=Io)

Vo=33.12V">Vo=33.12VVo=33.12V

Now, For Duty Cycle,

We know That,

Duty cycle (D">DD) = VoVi">VoViVoVi

So,

D=3336=0.91">D=3336=0.91D=3336=0.91

So, Duty cycle will be operated in the range of

"0.1<D<0.91"
Energy required to fulfill aircraft towing application is given by,
=power(P)⋅TotalTime(Tt)">=power(P)⋅TotalTime(Tt)=power(P)⋅TotalTime(Tt)
Let us Assume, Total Time taken = 10 min. = 600 sec.
So,
E=2500⋅600=1.5⋅106J">E=2500⋅600=1.5⋅106JE=2500⋅600=1.5⋅106J
Assumed Parameters are taken from(Link): https://www.lektro.com/products/ap8360/
Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.