Challenge

Identification of Cracks

1) A. Observations :

* Concrete crushed and the reinforcement is exposed

* Concrete spalled beyond the reinforcement which may be a sign of rupture

* Beam top portion looks safe because of the flange advantage from slab

* The crack develops from bottom to top means rebar yielding occurs in support bottom only

Answers:

* Its form of flexural failure due to reversal of stress during earthquake

* During stress reversal, support top experience compression and bottom experience tension

* Top compression is managed by slab advantage. Bottom tension was not satisfied by the provided reainforcement

* Since the reinforcement got yielded,it can not be repaired

1) B. Observation :

* Cracks along beam column edge

* Cracks seem to have developed through the structure as it looks much wider

* Beam looks separated from the column at joints

* Concrete is not severly crushed

Answers:

* Its beam pull out failure due to insufficient development length of reinforcement in joints

* During earthquake, The horizontal movement of structure makes this condition worse and detached the beam member

from column

* Providing anchorage length between two existing concrete is very diificult.so not repairable.

1) C. Observation :

* Cracks are exactly at the joints of column beam

* Cracks in beam developed through its entire width

* Slab also developed more cracks along the beam width direction

Answers:

* its is a plastic hinge failure

* The damage only occured in the joint zone first of all

* Cyclic lateral loading & stress reversal at the joints led to the damage

* Even the slab particulated to its best to handle the tension but unable to control the damage

* The joint can be strengthened

2) A. Observations :

* Concrete damaged at top of a column

* Concrete damaged all around the column face

* Beams are safe

* The location of column looks at edge of the building

* No walls are built along the column means it is probably at ground floor, for parking car movement access

Answers:

* Its a softy storey failure, Technically plastic hinge formation

* Due to abscence of infill walls at the ground floor,The plastic hinge forms at the top of ground storey columns during

lateral movement

* Based on the development of crush of concrete it can be either repairable or non repairable.

2) B. Observtions :

* Concrete developed complete breakage diagonally

* Longitudinally reinforcement are intact

* Shear reinforcement spacing looks widerc

Answers :

* Its a pure shear failure

* Inadequate shear reainforcement compels concrete rakes all the shear stresses

2) C. Observation :

* Column failed completely

* Failure at top of column

* There are two slabs connected to the column probably one at mid height of the column

* The wooden piles might be a post failure support after column failed, Providing temporary prop to avoid collapse of the entire structure

Answers:

* Its a short column failure

* An additional slab or a beam connected to a column in mid height leads to this effect

* This leads to failure especially if the connection is unintentinal and not accounted in design

* The failure given in the picture is not at all repairable.

Your portfolio, next

Ship work like this
in your own course.

Talk to a career counsellor

Free 20-minute call. We'll map the right course to where you want to work.

By submitting you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.