Stress Concentration on a plate with hole
Objective: Static Structural analysis on a plate with a single hole and a plate with multiple holes.
Question:
CASE-1:
Model: A plate is modelled as shown in question.
Boundary Conditions:
Material: Structural steel
Mesh Size: 3.5mm
Type of Elements: Tetrahedron
Fixed Support: Left surface as shown in question.
Force(Tensile): 500N on the right surface in +ve X-axis direction.
Gravity: -ve Z-axis direction.
Results:
Von-mises stress plot:
Deformation Plot:
CASE-2:
Model: A plate is modelled as shown in question.
Boundary Conditions:
Material: Structural steel
Mesh Size: 3.5mm
Type of Elements: Tetrahedron
Fixed Support: Left surface as shown in question.
Force(Tensile): 500N on the right surface in +ve X-axis direction.
Gravity: -ve Z-axis direction.
Results:
Von-mises stress plot:
Deformation Plot:
Comparison & Conclusion:
| CASE | Equivalent Stress(Mpa) | Total Deformation(mm) | ||
| Max | Min | Max | Min | |
| 1 | 0.66309 | 0.0003635 | 0.00053929 | 0 |
| 2 | 0.63753 | 0.00088126 | 0.00054041 | 0 |
- The stress developed in CASE-1 is more than in CASE-2, this is so because the stress developed in the multiple holes plate gets distributed due to the presence of smaller holes in the same plate, while there is only a single hole in CASE-1 and total deformation is slightly higher in Case-2 as stress is distributed along the body, strain is increased which resulted in increase in deformation.
- From an analysis standpoint, I will select the 2nd design as there is uniform stress distribution due to the presence of multiple holes and the deformation as compared to CASE-1 is slightly higher and negligible.
- From a manufacturing standpoint, CASE-1 will be preferred since it involves producing only a single hole of 60mm diameter and hence saves on the machining cost and effort as compared to CASE-2 where two additional 30mm diameter holes are to produced.